New Huma Emails Uncover Clinton State Dept Plan To Bring NYT Reporter David Brooks To Heel

Recently released Huma Abedin State Department emails – acquired by Judicial Watch via FOIA request, reveal Clinton State Department staff planning to summon New York Times reporter David Brooks for an “OTR” (off the record) conversation over a “shot” he took at Hillary in a Feburary 2010 article. This isn’t the first time we’ve learned of the Democrat apparatus wrapping their tentacles around the MSM, and it’s the second time in weeks Judicial Watch has delivered a bombshell. They’re doing good work.

In summary; Hillary Clinton – code named “Evergreen,” fired off an email on February 9th, 2010 to advisors Philippe Reines and Jake Sullivan regarding an article written by NYT’s David Brooks (links added):

From: Evergreen

To: PIR (Philippe Reines), Jake Sullivan

Subject: David Brooks

“Took a shot at me in his column today. Any ideas what prompted it?”

To which senior advisor Philippe Reines responds:

“Not sure – but this is a good excuse to bring him in for an OTR [off the record] with you. Lona mentioned you wanted to see [NYT Journalist] Tom Friedman – with your ok, we could schedule both (separately) over the next month or so.

I’d very much like to get back in the habit of bringing someone or a small group in every few weeks”

Followed by Jake Sullivan’s response:

Phillippe and I had an offline conversation about this and I agree entirely. I think it makes sense for you to meet with influencers on a regular — though not intrusive — basis. An OTR conversation with you is the best way to help guys like Brooks “figure out” how things work.

So a top Clinton advisor wanted to get ‘back in the habit’ of bringing people or groups in every few weeks? This clearly suggests the Clinton State Dept. was at some point regularly meeting with members of the MSM to discuss content. And how exactly did Hillary, assuming the ‘OTR’ meeting with David Brooks took place, help him to ‘figure out’ how things work?

NEW Huma Abedin email shows Clinton State Dept. plan to bring NYT reporter @nytdavidbrooks to heel & influence MSM. ?https://t.co/bASxk7iqdh pic.twitter.com/JVQ2ZSBKHX

— ZeroPointNow (@ZeroPointNow) April 3, 2017

Journalist and author Mike Cernovich has just dropped an exclusive bombshell – naming Obama’s National Security Advisor Susan Rice as the official responsible for the ‘unmasking’ of the incoming Trump team during ‘incidental’ surveillance. This was apparently discovered after the White House Counsel’s office reviewed Rice’s document log requests:

The reports Rice requested to see are kept under tightly-controlled conditions. Each person must log her name before being granted access to them.

Upon learning of Rice’s actions, [National Security Advisor] H. R. McMaster dispatched his close aide Derek Harvey to Capitol Hill to brief Chairman Nunes.

Cernovich points out, as revealed in an article by Circa, that President Obama began loosening the rules regarding “incidental intercepts” starting in 2011 – making it easier for the US Government to spy on individuals who are not the primary target(s) of a surveillance operation.

As his presidency drew to a close, Barack Obama’s top aides routinely reviewed intelligence reports gleaned from the National Security Agency’s incidental intercepts of Americans abroad, taking advantage of rules their boss relaxed starting in 2011 to help the government better fight terrorism, espionage by foreign enemies and hacking threats

And guess who had authorization to unmask individuals who were ‘incidentally’ surveilled? Former CIA Director John Brennan, former Attorney General Loretta Lynch, and Obama’s National Security advisor Susan Rice.

Also of note is the claim that New York Times journalist Maggie Haberman has been sitting on the Susan Rice story for at least two days:

This reporter has been informed that Maggie Haberman has had this story about Susan Rice for at least 48 hours, and has chosen to sit on it in an effort to protect the reputation of former President Barack Obama.

Fox News anchor Adam Housley tweeted on Friday that the surveillance that led to the unmasking began before Trump was the GOP nominee:

Our sources: This surveillance that led to the unmasking of private names of American citizens started before Trump was the GOP nominee.

— Adam Housley (@adamhousley) March 31, 2017

Housley also said that the person who did the unmasking is a “very senior” and “very well known” person in the surveillance community – and not someone in the FBI.

Our sources:The person who did the unmasking is "very well known, very high up, very senior, in the intelligence world & is not in the FBI

— Adam Housley (@adamhousley) March 31, 2017

It seems the spreading of names was done for “political purposes that have nothing to do with national security,” or foreign intelligence, but hurting Trump’s team, Housley noted.

“It had everything to do with hurting and embarrassing Trump and his team,” according to his sources. –TownHall

This of course begs the question of whether or not President Obama would have ordered Rice to perform the unmasking…

Updated below:

The MSM assault on independent entertainers may have just reached a new low. Six weeks after a failed attempt to smear PewDiePie –  whose audience of 54 million subscribers is the largest in YouTube history, Wall St. Journal reporter Jack Nicas – who’s clearly got an agenda, is out with another hit-piece designed to justify the demonetization of videos deemed offensive; except Nicas may have  fabricated the evidence.

H3h3 is one of the more popular YouTube comedy / entertainment channels. If PewDiePie makes an estimated $14-$20 million / year from his 53 million subscribers, h3h3 is probably pulling in at least a million dollars per year with their audience of 3.7 million. So, it was of particular concern to husband and wife owners Ethan and Hila Klein when they noticed their ad revenues declining following the PewDiePie hit piece, along with reports of widespread demonetization taking place.

After doing some digging, Ethan Klein from h3h3 apparently caught the WSJ author FABRICATING evidence…

To break it down:

• WSJ author Jack Nicas writes an article describing how YouTube “accidentally” advertised major brand names on a video with a racist title.
• Nicas took “screenshots of the ads” to prove they were being run over the racist titled video.
• In response, Coca Cola, PepsiCo, Wal-Mart, and Dish Network are pulling ads.

Ethan then contacted the uploader of the video…

While the WSJ article’s screenshots claiming monetization had 261,165 views, the entire video only has 261,406 TOTAL VIEWS according to the uploader’s dashboard… So clearly the WSJ screenshots were taken recently…

But Wait: 

Looks like that ad hasn’t been monetized since September of 2016 – for a very brief period of time, and YouTube’s automatic content filters did in fact kick in and demonetize the video as designed:

So Ethan from h3h3 appears to have caught Wall St. Journal author Jack Nicas fabricating screenshots for an article which allegedly led to major advertisers pulling their ads from YouTube. The WSJ article is exactly the kind of “evidence” YouTube can point to for justifying widespread demonetization, which is really about starving out up and coming entertainers whose influence is growing, especially among conservatives…

UPDATE: It appears that the video in question was apparently claimed by “OmniMediaMusic” – NOT the original uploader – and may have in fact been monetized. This would explain why the original uploader’s monetization stats died off.

.@h3h3productions messed up. The video was monetised by OmniaMediaMusic. Evidence in source code of original video.

— Ben (@TrustedFlagger) April 2, 2017

Earlier this month, Harvard Ph.D. Jerome Corsi of InfoWars and a CPA “who worked for two years for a major U.S. accounting firm as an outside auditor for Freddie Mac,” confirmed a 2012 scheme hatched by the Obama administration to funnel hundreds of billions in dividends from Government Sponsored Enterprises (GSE) Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to prop up the failing Obamacare program – by paying subsidies to insurers to remain in the system.

If you need to catch up on it, read the InfoWars article above or watch this 18 minute video:

The conclusion reached by Corsi and others is that this was probably illegal.

In fact, House Republicans actually sued the Obama Administration in 2014 over the fact that the subsidies to insurers weren’t appropriated by congress and won, which the Obama administration appealed. As Zerohedge and the Atlanta Journal Constitution pointed out last week, the Trump administration has until May 22nd to decide whether or not to pursue the appeal:

In 2014, House Republicans sued the Obama administration over the constitutionality of the cost-sharing reduction payments, which had not been appropriated by Congress. The lawmakers won the lawsuit, and the Obama administration appealed it. Late last year, with a new administration on the other end of the suit, the House sought to pause the proceedings — with a deadline for a status update in late May. –AJC

And a ZeroHedge analysis:

Of course, any decision to remove those subsidies would likely result in yet another massive round of premium hikes and further withdrawals from the already crippled exchanges where an astounding number of counties across the country have already been cut to just 1 health insurance provider.  And, as we’ve pointed out before, higher rates = lower participation = deterioration of risk pool = higher rates….and the cycle just repeats until it eventually collapses. –ZeroHedge

Meanwhile, President Trump has made several Tweets since the Ryancare debacle in congress:

ObamaCare will explode and we will all get together and piece together a great healthcare plan for THE PEOPLE. Do not worry!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) March 25, 2017

The Democrats will make a deal with me on healthcare as soon as ObamaCare folds – not long. Do not worry, we are in very good shape!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) March 28, 2017

But wait, could it happen even sooner? Former Blackrock portfolio manager Ed Dowd may be on to something…

By not long…do you literally mean weeks as you order the stop of the illegal Fannie/Freddy dividend sweep into Treasury thus ensuring ?? https://t.co/VEQ4bkgduG

— Ed (@DowdEdward) March 28, 2017

Since MSM won't report #Fanniegate all #Trump has to do is stop the steal and Obamacare literally implodes ? Within weeks. Watch Dems run!? https://t.co/vLzeJQbEhR

— Ed (@DowdEdward) March 26, 2017

Simple question: what if Trump’s Treasury simply stopped the illegal dividend sweep NOW? It is the end of the 1st quarter, after all…

Not only would it force the MSM to cover Obama’s 2012 scheme to siphon funds from Fannie and Freddie, the stage would be set for far more sensible healthcare solutions from lawmakers who aren’t simply shilling for the industry.

Update: And look who Trump’s golfing with today – Rand Paul and OMB Director Mick Mulvaney…

Attorney, author, and e-celeb Mike Cernovich has weighed in on the Flynn ‘immunity’ Fake News story from the New York Times, after multiple sources – including Flynn’s attorney, said it was bullshit.

Cernovich laid out exactly how any attorney would advise Flynn given the current political witch hunt in Washington – namely, seek some sort of protection or assurances in an environment in which words are continuously twisted and the FBI is out for blood. Flynn doesn’t trust the FBI, nor should he – especially after director Comey’s unpredictable flip-flopping during the 2016 election and lack of progress on major cases.

Watch for the legal analysis, stay for the rant over all the shady Clinton related shit that’s gone unpunished by the FBI…

I haven’t seen a cucking this thorough since the night a binder-wielding Kurt Eichenwald was nearly killed by a post-Tucker tweet…

Last night, Tucker Carlson effortlessly savaged attention craving Drexel University “professor” George Ciccariello – who made headlines in December after calling for White Genocide over Twitter.

On Tuesday, Ciccariello once again made the news after expressing his disgust when a 1st class passenger gave up his seat to a uniformed soldier on an airplane. Rational minds on the internet did not take too kindly:

In his latest stunt, the “white genocide” advocate led a group of feeble-voiced children in a protest of writer Charles Murray on the grounds that he’s a racist. The next stop for the Drexel degenerate; out of his safe space and into the lion’s den…

A facially ticking Ciccariello tried his best to match forces with Carlson, who simply kept knocking him on his ass – over, and over, and over. It was absolutely brutal:

Nobody takes you seriously, I’m trying to take you seriously. You’re accusing this guy of racial demagoguery and you called for white genocide, you also applauded the Haitian revolution for killing whites – look those are your views! I’m not saying you shouldn’t be allowed to express them. I’m merely pointing out the irony that you’re trafficking in race hatred and yet saying that Charles Murray shouldn’t be allowed to speak because he trafficks in race hatred. Are you self aware enough to catch that?

Tucker then goes on to read one of Ciccariello’s screeds, concluding “It’s High School writing… it’s crap!”

(that wasn’t even the best part… just watch until you see Tucker use air quotes)

Now that the CrowdStrike DNC election hacking report is looking more and more like a ham-handed scheme orchestrated by anti-Russia, anti-Trump factions – which include Atlantic Council co-chairs Evelyn Farkas and CrowdStrike’s Dmitri Alperovitch, it appears the “Muh Russia” contingency is just haphazardly throwing their remaining cards on the table. The men in wood paneled rooms have apparently let the lunatics run the asylum.

While the House Intelligence Committee is hard at work sifting through revelations that the Obama administration spied on Trump and his team, Senate Intelligence Committee chair Mark Werner (D-VA) has dribbled forth completely unsupported claims that Russia influenced the election by employing a ShareBlue-esque army of “Internet Trolls” to post Fake News stories in swing states!

Mr Warner said: “We know about the hacking, and selective leaks, but what really concerns me as a former tech guy is at least some reports – and we’ve got to get to the bottom of this – that there were upwards of a thousand internet trolls working out of a facility in Russia, in effect taking over a series of computers which are then called botnets, that can then generate news down to specific areas. –Independent.co.uk

I’ll give you a second to recover…

What’s “Nerd Virgin” in Russian?

Sorry folks from Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania – you’ve been had! Victimized! Fake News’d by the Russians! Your puny brains were no match for neckbearded Putin puppets who used the latest in mind control to rock the voteski.

“It’s been reported to me, and we’ve got to find this out, whether they were able to affect specific areas in Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, where you would not have been receiving off of whoever your vendor might have been, Trump versus Clinton, during the waning days of the election, but instead, ‘Clinton is sick’, or ‘Clinton is taking money from whoever for some source’ … fake news

Funny enough, the United States does exactly this. It’s called SOCKPUPPETING! Very original Werner…

Perhaps the Senate Intel Committee is afraid to release specific examples of alleged “Russian Trolling” because they know 4chan and Reddit’s “The_Donald” community – the other groups they tried to blame for Hillary’s loss – will tear it to shreds within hours?

Give it up Neocons. You ran an out of touch candidate who cheated against Bernie Sanders – a guy who may have actually beaten Trump, and white hats within US Intelligence community gave the emails to Julian Assange in order to reveal how corrupt she is. She also fainted on 9/11/2016 and was chucked into a van like a side of beef, which couldn’t have helped.

In the latest installment of “leak, counter-leak,” the New York Times – owned by a Mexican billionaire, is once again meddling in US Politics.

Following last week’s bombshell announcement by House Intel Committee chair Devin Nunes that President Trump and associates were “incidentally” swept up and “unmasked” in surveillance operations, the NYT has revealed his confidential White House sources.

Several current American officials identified the White House officials as Ezra Cohen-Watnick, the senior director for intelligence at the National Security Council, and Michael Ellis, a lawyer who works on national security issues at the White House Counsel’s Office and formerly worked on the staff of the House Intelligence Committee.

Hilariously, the NYT’s sources have spoken on the condition of anonymity because they’re afraid of drawing ire from the whistleblowers:

The officials spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe the intelligence and to avoid angering Mr. Cohen-Watnick and Mr. Ellis. Officials say Mr. Cohen-Watnick has been reviewing the reports from his fourth-floor office in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building, where the National Security Council is based.

There’s some serious dodge ball going on…

As ZeroHedge reports, Mr. Cohen-Watnick was nearly ousted from his position on the National Security Council by National Security Adviser H.R. McMaster, however President Trump intervened – overruling the decision after Cohen-Watnick appealed to White House advisors Stephen Bannon and Jared Kushner on the failings of CIA intelligence gathering operations.

A Washington consultant told Politico that Cohen-Watnick and Flynn “saw eye to eye about the failings of the CIA human intelligence operations,” and that the “CIA saw him as a threat, so they tried to unseat him and replace him with an agency loyalist. –Forward.com

Also included in the NYT article are assertions that the intel reports consist primarily of foreign officials and ambassadors attempting to cozy up to Trump’s family and inner circle ahead of the inauguration – which is in line with Nunes’s disclosure that the surveillance of Trump and his team was not related to any investigations related to Russia.

This is getting ridiculous. In addition to a former government official leaking classified information to “The Hill,” NeverTrumper Evan McMuffin also claims to know secret details of Trump’s alleged ties to Russia.

Welcome to America, where operational security and access to sensitive information are a complete joke…

Nine days after Fox News benched Andrew “Judge” Napolitano for claiming former President Obama used British intelligence as a proxy to spy on Donald Trump and his team, an assertion cited by President Trump, the polished Italian pundit was back on the air – standing by his claim.

Bill Hemmer: ‘Judge, nice to see you. You’ve had a few quiet days. You put out a story about 10 days ago. You said you were confident in the story that you reported here um in the past month. Do you still stand by it?”

Judge Nap: “Yes, I do and the sources stand by it and the American public needs to know more about this rather than less because a lot of the government surveillance authorities will expire in the fall…

Judge Andrew Napolitano returns to Fox News after being benched for 9 days. Stands by UK wiretap claims… ? https://t.co/RdhMPAccdq pic.twitter.com/kRPkVg2pmG

— ZeroPointNow (@ZeroPointNow) March 29, 2017

Hang on…

Cutting through the weeds, let’s look at this. Just nine days ago, Fox felt Napolitano had “gone wild” and was deemed too hot for TV (you’re welcome Napolitanophiles). Today he’s back, and Fox News host Bill Hemmer specifically asked about the wiretap claims – which Napolitano specifically reaffirmed. This wasn’t random banter; Fox News approved that entire exchange, which means an assessment of current events was taken and the claims either verified, or at minimum deemed credible enough for prime time.

What’s happened over the last nine days?

Bombshell revelations by the head of the House Intelligence Committee of Incidental surveillance, unmasking, and other legal verbiage which translates to “Trump was fucking spied on.”

Freedom Watch issues letter to Devin Nunes claiming that the FBI sat on a massive pile of surveillance evidence for two years, wants him to ask FBI Director Comey WTF. Comey skips out on this week’s session.

Video from the beginning of March resurfaces of stupid doe-eyed Obama Admin leaker admitting to it, adding to the golden shower of suspicion surrounding the Obama administration.

Bob Woodward – Watergate guy, says this is some serious shit and Obama officials possibly facing criminal charges.

Former CIA intelligence officer Colonel Shaffer says he believes “this is much worse than Watergate.”

CrowdStrike’s Russian hacking report starts to fall apart.

Skeletor over at the DNC cleaned house.

What did I forget?

In short, since Judge Napolitano made the British spying claim – the DNC has further unraveled and the Obama White House appears to have committed some serious crimes. Furthermore, Napolitano made clear that his source is “intact,” and that the American public needs to know how out of control government surveillance has become.

Game, Set, ???

Former Obama Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense, Evelyn Farkas, made some stunning admissions during an interview with MSNBC’s Mika Brzezinski.

While discussing the mad scramble by the Obama administration to collect and preserve intelligence on alleged Russian election hacking before Obama left office, it appears that Farkas accidentally implicated the Obama White House in the surveillance of Trump’s campaign staff:

The Trump folks, if they found out how we knew what we knew about the Trump staff dealing with Russians, that they would try to compromise those sources and methods, meaning we would not longer have access to that intelligence.

Furthermore, Farkas effectively corroborated a New York Times article from early March which cited “Former American officials” as their anonymous source regarding efforts to leak this surveillance on the Trump team to Democrats across Washington DC.

I became very worried because not enough was coming out into the open and I knew that there was more. We have very good intelligence on Russia. So then I had talked to some of my former colleagues and I knew they were trying to also get information to the hill.

That’s why you have the leaking.

In other words; the Obama administration was concerned about spoliation of evidence gathered through various “sources and methods” of surveillance, so a plan was hatched to leak this information to congress – also known as “The Hill.”

Former Obama DoD Deputy Evelyn Farkas reveals White House gathered intel on Trump campaign staff and then leaked it! https://t.co/W6FG4IFe5Q pic.twitter.com/VwaF2CnZzn

— ZeroPointNow (@ZeroPointNow) March 29, 2017

Possible conspiracy to frame Russia for the DNC server breach? 

On a related note, Evelyn Farkas is also a senior fellow at the vehemently anti-Russia Atlantic Council, along with Crowdstrike founder Dimitri Alperovitch. The Atlantic Council is funded by the US State Department, NATO, Latvia, Lithuania, and Ukranian Oligarch Victor Pinchuk.

CrowdStrike, the Irvine, CA company partially funded by Google, was the only entity allowed to analyze the DNC servers in relation to claims of election hacking:

Is it true the DNC would not allow the FBI access to check server or other equipment after learning it was hacked? Can that be possible?

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) March 5, 2017

Notably, CrowdStrike has recently been discredited – and was forced to retract evidence used in a botched report on Russia hacking Ukranian military equipment.

CrowdStrike has retracted statements it used to buttress claims of Russian hacking https://t.co/8AZOvoQl0K

— Michael Tracey (@mtracey) March 28, 2017

To sum up:

• The White House surveilled the Trump campaign and then leaked information to anti-Trump allies in congress (on “The Hill”).
• The Russian hacking claim hinges on a CrowdStrike Report from Dimitri Alperovitch.
• Alperovitch was forced to retract statements in a report blaming Russia for hacking Ukrainian military equipment – a failed attempt to smear Putin.
• Alperovitch, along with White House Leaker Evelyn Farkas and Ukrainian Oligarch Victor Pinchuk, are all senior fellows on the Atlantic Council – which is vehemently anti-Russia.

(As an aside – Joe Biden’s son, Hunter Biden, sits on the board of a Ukrainian gas company reportedly owned by Pinchuk)

Is it a stretch to suggest that the CrowdStrike report on the DNC hack was fabricated to pin the DNC hack on Russia?

Let’s not forget that Dr. Steve Pieczenik – former CIA spookmaster and expert on all things cloak and dagger, completely laid out what’s going on:

“We initiated a counter-coup through Julian Assange, who’s been very brave and really quite formidable in his ability to come forth and provide all the necessary emails that we gave to him to undermine Hillary and Bill Clinton.”

In other words, ‘white hats’ within US intelligence agencies passed the emails to Julian Assange in order to wrestle control of the USA out of the hands of the Clinton cabal of Neocon globalists.

It’s also quite likely that Seth Rich, the mysteriously murdered DNC computer expert, assisted this effort. Recall that Wikileaks, while they would not confirm Rich as a source, offered a $20,000 reward for information leading to the arrest of Rich’s killer(s) – and then raised it to $130,000. Simply read between the lines during this Julian Assange interview.

Julian Assange heavily implies Seth Rich was DNC leaker… https://t.co/W6FG4IFe5Q pic.twitter.com/6ytad7kRLZ

— ZeroPointNow (@ZeroPointNow) March 29, 2017

Reward for the killers of Seth Rich is now $130,000 https://t.co/KAiNFJusIb

— WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) January 19, 2017

At best, the Atlantic Council connections between a member of Obama’s DoD who leaked surveillance intel to congress, an increasingly suspicious Crowdstrike report, and a Ukrainian oligarch are mere coincidence. At worst, we may be looking at massive treason committed against an incoming US President.