iBankCoin
18 years in Wall Street, left after finding out it was all horseshit. Founder/ Master and Commander: iBankCoin, finance news and commentary from the future.
Joined Nov 10, 2007
20,179 Blog Posts

If Evelyn Farkas Resigned in 2015, How Did She Have Access to Trump-Russian Intelligence?

This was making waves yesterday, after Evelyn Farkas admitted to Mika from The Morning Joe show that she strongly advised people ‘on the hill’ and in our intelligence agencies to tuck away intelligence regarding Russo-Trump ties for the sake of preservation, in an effort to protect it from the onerous bureaucracy she obviously finds to be deplorable.

“Get as much intelligence as you can before President Obama leaves the administration,” said Farkas in an interview yesterday on MSNBC.

She was afraid the Trump people would gain access to their intelligence and whisk it away — because they’re all Russian spies, obviously.

Aside from what appears to be a brazen confirmation of spying on the Trump team, the bigger red flag here is Dr. Farkas wasn’t employed by the Obama administration at the time the Russian allegations arose.

According to Pentagon records, Dr. Farkas resigned in September of 2015.

So how did this non-resident fellow at the Atlantic Council, member of the Council on Foreign Relations, and former deputy assistant secretary of defense for Russia, Ukraine and Eurasia, gain knowledge of intelligence regarding members of Trump’s team and their relations with Russia, when she was the senior foreign policy advisor for Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton?

Farkas was the prime driver behind the anti-Russia phobia inside the Pentagon during the Obama years — shilling hard for the Ukraine — requesting that the President send them anti-tank missiles — which, essentially, would mean outright war with Russia.

Back to the interview with Mika Brzezinski. Dr. Farkas said ‘we’ had good intel on Russia. Who does she refer to when she says ‘we?’

Professional Deep Stater, Dr. Evelyn Farkas, Globalist Shill

Here’s Mark Levin’s take on this scandal.

Perhaps someone inside the Obama government was leaking to the Hillary campaign?

I think we all know what the answer is to the rhetorical question.

If you enjoy the content at iBankCoin, please follow us on Twitter

23 comments

  1. bushwacker2

    Future ambassador to Dumbfuckistan.

    • 1
    • 1
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  2. stockslueth

    Well, we know she was being fed debate questions beforehand in multiple instances so why not intelligence leaks? Sounds like stuff out of the same unethical and dishonest playbook to me.

    • 2
    • 1
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
    • sarcrilege

      she needs (free) pap smear – she’s rotting from inside out, no doubt.

      • 0
      • 0
      • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  3. small pleb

    Ruh. Roh.

    • 1
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  4. din

    Nothing will become of this, unfortunately. It never does.

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  5. sarcrilege

    It’s all one, big, happy family these pinko apparatchiks working for the Soros/Klintont crime family.

    • 3
    • 0
    • 1 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  6. TJWP

    The answer is Treason.

    • 1
    • 1
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  7. derp

    Rules for radicals, accuse your opponent of doing the very thing you have done. The Klintons are all about turning the USA into their own ATM. Who in their right fucking mind could support that unless you plan to steal some of it too, with interest.

    And WTF was Nobama telling the Russians on the hot mic, that he would have more flexibility after 2012? Peaches, bennyhill? Crickets chirping. Trump Russians Muh.

    • 2
    • 1
    • 1 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  8. traderconfessions
    traderconfessions

    While you cucktards wander into Conspiracyland, I’m waiting for the Senate Intelligence Committee to eviscerate the “what me?” Trump defense about Russia. Do I think there is a Trump smoking gun? Nope. But when his cronies, even the fair Prince Jared, are implicated by indisputable facts even Trump’s small Twitter dancing fingers won’t be able to save him from humiliation and more LOSING. The glorious unraveling continues.

    • 4
    • 1
    • 2 Deem this to be "Fake News"
    • sarcrilege

      ….while you ignore the fact that Klintons’ campaign was funded by Soros who is a pinko bolshevik financing communist agenda agencies in the US to hire fucked up professional protesters to disrupt peaceful communities.

      • 3
      • 2
      • 1 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  9. JakeGint

    Amazing to watch the Klintonoids whistle past their graveyard as the Barack Milhouse Nixon Watergate II Electric Bugaloo conspiracy unwinds.

    Sure, if GBW’s Administration had not only been spying on Hussein in 2008, but leaking his far left dirt to wide-eyed McCain operatives like this Farkakta woman, the Press wouldn’t have raised a ruckus…

    They’d have raised a gibbet. Time to get “woke,” Trader-Needs-to-Go-to-Confessions.

    ________________

    • 2
    • 2
    • 1 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  10. unrelated

    Can’t really blame her for quitting in 2015, who needs that? I bet she wasn’t shocked when her former colleague was literally shot in the back for bringing transparency to the hill, or at least congress, or at least Wikileaks. She knew their corruption was coming to light so she got out.

    • 2
    • 1
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  11. peaches

    If Trump got elected in November… why is it March and all we have accomplished is restricting a ban on dumping coal ash into rivers.

    and bombing whoever Saudi wants us to bomb.

    Just like Muslim Obama lol

    • 3
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"