iBankCoin
Wake up. Break the cycle. Teach your children.
Joined Oct 24, 2016
1,140 Blog Posts

President of Finland: Pootie Not So Bad, NATO Lame, Greatest Threats To Europe Are Terrorism And Migration

The President of Finland, Sauli Niinistö, made it clear to CNBC that while Russia’s actions involving Crimea must come to a peaceful resolution, the most important issues facing Europe right now are terrorism and migration. Despite Finland pledging $55 Million Euros to NATO, Niinistö also made it clear that European nations need to ultimately be responsible for their own security.

I think that Europeans start to understand that they have to take more responsibility of their own security, in spite of the fact that they are members of NATO.

We still have conscription… …if we call our trained reserves, we have a bigger army than Germany, even though we are some 15 times smaller.

Is the greatest threat to Europe Vladimir Putin?

No, it’s a combination of terrorism and migration. And also, Russia  – what happened to Crimea in Ukraine. In the Western parts of the union, people are more shocked with terrorism and migration, and in the Eastern parts, it’s Russia.

Crimea is about the flow of energy into Europe, not some humanitarian crisis – though Putin might want to send some more love their way if he’s going to keep them.

 

Comments »

Glenn Greenwald Tells Truth About DNC: Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer Leading Collapsed Party of Shills

Glenn Greenwald appeared on Tucker Carlson Tonight for yet another truth bombing. The Intercept co-founder, attorney, and author penned an article on the deeply flawed DNC’s inability to cope with loss. As Greenwald and others have pointed out since the election, Democrats seem to have a major problem with introspection. I get it – admitting fault means being wrong, and for a party built upon emotionalism and condescending moralization instead of facts and common sense, being wrong strips the self-righteous DNC of the one argument they’ve built their entire platform on; we’re right because we say we are.

From Greenwald’s article:

A failed, collapsed party cannot form an effective resistance. Trump did not become president and the Republicans do not dominate virtually all levels of government because there is some sort of massive surge in enthusiasm for right-wing extremism. Quite the contrary: This all happened because the Democrats are perceived — with good reason — to be out of touch, artificial, talking points-spouting automatons who serve Wall Street, Silicon Valley, and the agenda of endless war, led by millionaires and funded by oligarchs to do the least amount possible for ordinary, powerless citizens while still keeping their votes.

Enjoy:

Comments »

Disney / Google / WSJ Attack On PewDiePie Backfiring Spectacularly – Generation Z Now Woke

PewDiePie is a Swedish web-comedian and performance artist – with over 53 Million subscribers who know he isn’t a racist. He’s got the largest online audience in history, comprised mostly of post-millennial “Generation Z” youth, and his also-popular girlfriend Marzia has 7 million subscribers – making them internet’s unofficial first couple. PewDiePie has made tens of millions of dollars from his channel, yet he’s remained humble and real throughout his ascent to internet greatness. The problem? He came out as a Trump supporter during the election, and the MSM has been gunning for him ever since.

I’m sure you’re aware of what happened over the last week; PewDiePie, whose real name is Felix Kjellberg, made a few anti-Semitic jokes and immediately had his ass handed to him by Disney and Google after the soon to be failing Wall St. Journal made a national issue out of the 27 year old’s antics. The WSJ also cobbled together a hit-piece video accompanying their report, which spliced together out of context footage of PewDiePie doing Nazi stuff. It’s been dismantled.

Kids love the guy. They know PewDiePie. So the fact that corporate media thought they could simply gang up and wave a magic wand branding Kjellberg a Nazi was ham-handed and presumptuous. As if WSJ, Disney, Google, Salon, Slate, and the rest of the queued up MSM hit-squad could convince kids and their parents that a guy who’s been speaking directly to them, unfiltered and genuine – is Hitler reincarnate.

Heil Hitlarious.

In the world of influence, PewDiePie has a lot of power. He’s also woke – meaning, he doesn’t buy the SJW / bleeding-heart narratives which have driven much of America’s easily triggered youth to retarded hysterics. PewDiePie is quite frankly un-poisoning the minds of hyper-sensitive kids raised on kneejerk identity politics;  the untriggering of America if you will. PewDiePie was a threat to the MSM.

I don’t remember the WSJ writing about Family Guy’s Jew jokes, or Howard Stern’s Hitler bits, or Louis CK’s Holocaust jokes. I wonder why?

Why the selective outrage WSJ?

The response to the MSM throwing PewDiePie under the bus has been glorious:

First: PewDiePie has issued a response (see here), which – in mere hours, has 99.9% thumbs up with over 800,000 users voting as of this writing – far exceeding it’s view count. Clearly people don’t even need to watch it to know he’s not an anti-Semite.

Next: Reddit’s largest anti-Trump forum /r/news, is on PewDiePie’s side. This is huge divide-dealing, generation-redpilling stuff. Click here and just scroll down to see what this exceedingly liberal audience has to say about it, then go back to /r/the_donald where free speech is still relatively safe.

And the rest of the internet is on fire in response to the WSJ/Disney/Google’s shit:

Hashtag #PewDiePieDidNothingWrong is trending.

Someone started a Change.org petition to reinstate his show.

Good job Disney / WSJ / Google – you played yourselves by pouring lighter fluid on a raging fire of truth.

Comments »

Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) Claims “Military Industrial Intel Axis” Trying To Reignite Cold War

This is two days old but worth a watch. Former member of the House of Representatives and surprisingly redpilled two-time Democratic Presidential Candidate Dennis Kucinich went on Fox’s First 100 Days on Valentine’s day to excoriate the US intelligence community for compromising National Security.

“I think we have to look at this a little bit deeper. A phone call from the incoming director of National Security was intercepted, and the contents given to the media, and so obviously shared by intelligence officials. What’s at the core of this is an effort by some in the intelligence community to upend any positive relationship between the US and Russia, and I tell you there’s a marching band and chowder society out there – there’s gold in them thar hills, there are people trying to separate the US and Russia so that this “military industrial intel axis” can cash in… it’s early in the morning, it’s Valentine’s day, but wake up America.”

“Hey look, what’s going on in this intelligence community with this new president is unprecedented. They’re making every effort to upend him. Who knows what the truth is anymore? This is like the electronic version of Mad Magazine, Spy vs. Spy, and so the bottom line is – we should not start a cold war again with Russia. The American People forked over Billions of dollars for the last one, and changed the quality of life in this country. There’s something wrong going on here in the intelligence community.”

“He has to get control of his intelligence apparatus. This isn’t a joke. This is a serious matter. If he doesn’t get control of where the information is coming from, he’ll never know the truth. The American people won’t know the truth, and we could be set at war with almost ANY country. Be very careful is my warning this morning.”

Comments »

Heads Will Roll: Jason Chaffetz Requests Official DOJ Investigation Into Illegal Leaks Of Flynn-Russia Calls To The Press

Heads are about to roll, can you feel it? House Oversight Committee Chairman Rep. Jason Chaffetz along with Bob Goodlatte (R-VA)  have submitted a letter to the Justice Department’s inspector general, Michael Horowitz, requesting a formal investigation into both the surveillance and subsequent leaks of classified communications “of or regarding” former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn – citing the highly inappropriate release of information.

Generally, collection activities by intelligence agencies are classified, as are the products that result from those activities. This is to ensure the continued integrity of the sources and methods used. Therefore, it seems probable that the fact that an intelligence agency monitored the call, if it did, as well as any recording of the call, would also be classified.

Chaffetz and Goodlatte’s letter cite “serious concerns” about mishandling of classified information, stating the release of which would, by definition, “have grave effects on national security.”

In a discussion with Fox’s First 100 Days, Chaffetz also made clear that he’s concerned about both the Flynn leaks and President Trump’s conduct, following a letter the congressman to the White House over Trump’s public discussion at Mar-a-Lago with Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe regarding North Korea’s recent missile launch.

“no matter where you are on the political spectrum, you cannot have classified information migrating out into a non-classified setting.”

While it’s perhaps to be expected that our intelligence agencies might monitor an incoming administration’s communications, using those obviously classified conversations as a weapon for the purposes of propaganda designed to undermine a sitting US President is absolutely beyond the pale.

“How does that information end up at the news media? The President has made some very serious allegations in his description in the movement of this information.

See text of the Chaffetz / Goodlatte letter here (with Fox interview below):

Comments »

Why Is The Intel Community About To “Go Nuclear” Against Trump Who Will “Die In Jail” – While Our Enemies Conspire To Behead Us All?

Former NSA analyst and ex-Naval War College professor John Schindler – who is very clearly part of the faction to remove Trump by any means, revealed that the Intelligence Community (IC) is about to “go nuclear” against the sitting US President. Apparently they are convinced he’s a traitor.

Schindler’s been at this a while:

Look guys, of course Mike Flynn was going to talk to Russia; Obama was acting reckless in the final weeks of his Presidency – expelling diplomats over claims that Russia (and not an internal leak, or criminally inept IT) cost Hillary Clinton the election by exposing her inner-workings to the world. Plus there was that aggressive US troop deployment into Poland to appease freeloading NATO. Flynn clearly has a cordial relationship with Russia – having appeared as a regular guest on RT to discuss teaming up with Moscow to kick ISIL ass, and dining at a media awards ceremony with Russian President Vladimir Putin. But let’s revisit why Obama fired decorated General Mike Flynn in the first place; for being too aggressive about going after the Islamic State –  which was created in the vacuum of Iraq and armed by our enemies. 

Is RT host Larry King a Russian shill too? Is John Podesta a Russian shill for sitting on the same board of a Russian-paid energy company as Russian officials? Maybe Trump’s enemies should apply the same standard of judgment to their own leadership before they claim Russian infiltration. Americans – from the average Joe to the average spook, have been conditioned to fear and hate Russia, when in fact ample evidence exists that our leaders have been cozy with them for quite some time despite ongoing spy games and occasional “adjustments” to each others’ clandestine workforces. Let’s also recognize that incoming Presidents have talked to foreign governments for years; Obama did a pre-inaugural roadshow in 2008, his Ambassador talked to Russia, and his reps talked to Iran and Hamas. So let’s cut the shit. For those of you convinced Red Dawn is always around the corner, it’s time to sing Christmas carols in the trenches instead of worshipping the call to prayer.

And let’s be honest – the actual Flynn tape, though cleared by the FBI, was very likely a case of bad optics. I’m guessing the illegally recorded and leaked conversation would have been way too casual for prime-time, given the MSM’s highly influential Russophobic obsession. But hey, as long as we’re not Islamophobic – right? Prince Alwaleed is only the largest private shareholder in both Obama cabinet-picking Citigroup AND free-speech censoring Twitter, and Russia totally orchestrated 9/11 and reignited 15 more years of bombing countless impoverished brown people – fomenting hatred of the West and kicking off the migrant crisis. By the way, you know Gadhafi and Europe had a deal to keep the migrants at bay, right? Then Hillary and Obama stuck a knife in his ass. We came, we saw, we destroyed Europe under the guise of humanitarianism. Maybe it’s time for a change?

By trying to take down Trump for mending relations with Russia, foot soldiers of the deep state are choosing ISIS-backing Saudi Arabia and their plans for a global caliphate over a Christian nation that fought with us in two world wars. Tough choice I guess, but the cold war is over. Putin knows it’ll be Fallout 5 if he moves further West; and let’s face it – Crimea voted for Putin to grab them by the government (though quite frankly it looks like Vlad needs to take better care of them or give it back).

Of course the US and Russia will continue to spy on each other while our nuclear submarines play games under the arctic – continually testing the balance of power. But let’s think about the bigger picture and the lesser evil; Russia’s primary goal is to get richer controlling the flow of energy throughout Europe. Fine, whatever – not our problem. It will lead to thorium reactors and other forms of alternative energy – which can happen right now, by the way. As oil runs out, the balance of power will inevitably shift again.

Does the deep state choose Saudi Arabia over Russia because they think the King is under our thumb? The house of Saud and it’s Middle Eastern allies are exceedingly powerful; they’ve infiltrated the highest echelons of US politics and intelligence – and we’ve been owned for quite some time. If you’re against Trump, you’re (perhaps unwittingly) serving them right now – and we’ve been at it for too long. Why did the Bin Laden family get to slip out of the country with a police escort right after 9/11 when they were clearly suspects? Do you think Qatar and Saudi Arabia gave tens of millions to the Clinton Foundation because they’re charitable? Come on.

And do you think certain nouveau-riche Lamborghini chroming human rights abusing kingdoms will continue to be our friends when the oil runs out? Absolutely not – they hate us. And by the time the deep state is done with them, they will be rich beyond measure; buying nukes from Pyongyang by the container load to clear a path for that global caliphate. Their land will be barren after all, and they feel entitled to greener pastures after a century of  Western meddling. They feel entitled to dominate the West, driving Swedish women to wear “don’t rape me” bracelets – which are about as useful as gun-free zones. Now consider the alternative; do you think Russia wants to invade in some red-dawn nightmare? I don’t think so. Instead, people should be losing sleep over the revenge exacted by oil-rich enemies once we’ve given them all the tools to do so – starting with importing and distributing networks of “men of fighting age” while insisting it’s mostly women and children seeking refuge from oppression. Make no mistake, they have plans.

So what’s the endgame, guys? Impeach or otherwise remove Trump, give the football back to the neocons, flood the country with people who hate us, and go continue the path towards war with Russia in an effort to topple Assad for that Saudi pipeline? Sounds like a great future. At the end of the day, Russia is far less of a threat to our way of life than what Europe is going through right now – unless you think trucks careening through holiday crowds and bi-annual airport bombings are the way to go?

What about people who shill for Riyadh?

Comments »

JK Rowling – “Serial Loser” Who’s Gone Into Hiding Since Cernovich, Watson, And Piers Morgan Put Her On Blast

Children’s author, Billionaire, and internet tough girl J.K. Rowling is in over her head. After a fierce twitter spat with Piers Morgan – started after Aussie comedian Jim Jeffries told Morgan to Fuck Off on Bill Maher’s show over Trump’s Executive Order on immigration, Rowling has been taken to task by political commentators Mike Cernovich and Paul Joseph Watson over her virtue signaling bullshit – after Cernovich’s offer to send hundreds of refugees to live in the Harry Potter author’s several mansions for a year.

Rowling’s response?

 

 

Others joined the fun – starting with this change.org petition to “Have JK Rowling stay at a refugee camp for 7 days, no bodyguards, to show they’re peaceful”

Meanwhile, Piers Morgan appeared on Tucker Carlson Tonight to discuss the Harry Potter author, calling her a “Serial Loser.”

“If you’re J.K. Rowling, you’re three for three. You are the worst celebrity political pundit on the entire planet.”

Then of course there’s this guy.

 

Comments »

OUT: Michael Flynn Resigns As National Security Advisor

Michael T. Flynn has resigned as National Security Advisor, per CNN.

As reported earlier, President Trump and advisor Steve Bannon had reportedly been weighing firing Mike Flynn, after Trump was reportedly warned by the DOJ that Flynn was “Vulnerable to Russian Blackmail.” This comes after reports surfaced of pre-inauguration conversations Flynn reportedly had with Russia discussing sanctions put in place in response to Russia’s alleged involvement in hacking the US Election.

On Monday, White House counselor Kellyanne Conway stated that Flynn “does enjoy the full confidence of the President” – a statement which was cautiously walked back a short while later by Sean Spicer, who downgraded it to Trump “evaluating” the situation.

While Flynn’s reported pre-inaugural conversation with Russia wasn’t groundbreaking in terms of precedent, Reuters columnist Tim Weiner describes why “this time it’s different.”

Was it wrong for Flynn to talk with the Russian envoy? Absolutely not. Kissinger himself met with Boris Sedov, officially a diplomat but actually a spy, at the Soviet Embassy on Jan. 2, 1969, eighteen days before President Nixon was inaugurated and Kissinger became his national security adviser. “Sedov said that the Soviet Union was very interested that the inaugural speech contain some reference to open channels of communication to Moscow,” Kissinger told the president-elect. Nixon took that to heart at his swearing-in. His exact words, addressed to Moscow: “Our lines of communication will be open.”

The difference between then and now? Kissinger checked in with FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover before he went to talk to Sedov. In the context of the Cold War, that constituted the highest security clearance. Reuters

Flynn’s resignation marks the second Flynn in just over two months to lose their job over stupid shit.

Comments »

Trump Bypasses MSM At Trudeau Press Conference, “Failing” NYT Journalist Has Hissy Fit

The Chief White House Correspondent for the NY Times, Peter Baker, appears to be having a Twitter meltdown after being passed over for a question during a press conference with Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau – taking a backseat to lesser known ABC affiliate WJLA and the Daily Caller.

Baker is pissed that the MSM didn’t get a chance to hijack the Q&A to ask a completely unrelated question about General Flynnn’s reported pre-inaugural contact with Russia – because if true, trying to mend relations after Obama ejected 35 Russian diplomats and instituted sanctions over thinly supported hacking claims is a bad thing.  (UPDATE: Flynn has resigned after apparently going rogue and failing to seek permission to talk to Russia – unlike Henry Kissinger, who did just that in 1969).

twittermelt

Right guys – reporters who fail to try and sandbag the President with questions unrelated to the press conference should be ashamed of themselves. Give me a break.

Maybe don’t hire reporters who call the First Lady a hooker and you’ll get called on more?

mel1

Comments »

Stephanopoulos Browbeats Trump Advisor Over “Zero Evidence” of NH Voter Fraud (Except Of Course That New O’Keefe Video Showing Exactly That)

Exceedingly short statured Clinton operative-turned-journalist George Stephanopoulos was a complete dick to Trump advisor Stephen Miller yesterday on This Week, after the President rekindled claims of voter fraud in New Hampshire during a Thursday meeting with senators to discuss Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch:

The president claimed that he would have been victorious in the Granite State if not for the “thousands” of people who were “brought in on buses” from neighboring Massachusetts to “illegally” vote in New Hampshire. –Politico

Throughout the interview, Stephanopoulis aggressively pressed Miller:

Stephanopoulos: I’m asking you as the White House senior policy advisor – the President made a statement that he was a victim of voter fraud. Do you have any evidence?

You have provided absolutely no evidence.

Miller – who may be from another dimension, couldn’t or wouldn’t point to specific and concrete examples of fraud, instead offering anecdotal evidence and suggesting that This Week wasn’t a proper venue to offer proof:

MILLER: Bussing voters into new Hampshire is widely known by anyone who’s worked in New Hampshire politics. It’s very real, it’s very serious, and this show is not the venue for me to lay out all the evidence.

Voter fraud is a serious problem in this country, you have millions of people who are registered 2 states, who are dead and registered to vote , 14% of non-citizens at a minimum are registered to vote.

Watch:

I’d have to say tiny George Stephanopoulos: 1, Miller: 0 though George has been doing this a long time, and miller didn’t in fact provide anything of substance.

Not to worry George – James O’Keefe of Project Veritas just came through with a video showing multiple New Hampshire poll workers encouraging two undercover operatives to LIE about their residency in order to cast ballots:

P. Veritas: I’m not living here as of right now, I’m just looking to vote here.

Poll worker: Do you have intention of living here indefinitely?

P. Veritas: Not indefinitely

Poll worker: You want to vote today, you might tell them that you’re with your friend and you’re here indefinitely. Which sounds like it’s true.

P. Veritas: Not 100% true.

Poll worker: Right, but you’re here indefinitely, and your address is your friend’s house. And then you’d be able to vote.

See for yourself

No voter fraud my ass. I have a feeling this is just heating up…

Comments »