Two weeks ago Reuters penned an article explaining how they changed the structure of the Reuters/Ipsos presidential poll. The modifications were enacted July 29th–just two days after Trump was seen taking a lead over Clinton for the first time, see below:
This was just after the RNC Convention and mid-#DNCLeak, but before Trump’s “second amendment people” faux pas. Pollsters noticed something about the results. They found so many people were voting “Neither/Other” that the results were under reporting of who voters would ultimately choose come election day.
Here is the explanation Reuters gives:
“…in a presidential campaign notable for its negativity, the option of ‘Neither’ candidate appears to be an appealing alternative, at least to participants in the Reuters/Ipsos opinion poll. Many voters on both sides have been ambivalent in their support for Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton and Republican nominee Donald Trump, complicating the task of the pollsters trying to track the race. That sentiment may help explain an apparent skew that recently emerged in the Reuters/Ipsos poll results. Given the choice, a relatively large group of voters opted for “Neither/Other” candidate compared with other major polls, leading to an underreporting of several percentage points for one or other of the two major contenders at times in the race.”
Without ‘Neither’ as a option, the polls skewed back into Hillary’s favor, pushing her to 40% and Trump down to 35%.
Trump supporters consider this a prime example of mainstream media presenting a deceptive narrative where Hillary Clinton maintains “front runner” status.
Whether or not five front page hit pieces against Trump is a crooked attempt by mainstream media to affect the outcome of the election or just journalists trying to sell subscriptions, the odds book I trust shows Trump losing by a landslide. And unless the FiveThirtyEight stats dramatically swing, I expect to we will all be welcoming HRC back into the White House come November:
Comments »