On Tuesday afternoon, Romanian hacker Guccifer 2.0 claimed to have successfully hacked inside into the Clinton Foundation database.
One of the most damning revelations thus far comes from a snapshot allegedly taken of the root directory which shows a folder titled “Pay to Play” a term often used to described the crony-type behavior of the State Department under the Hillary Clinton regime.
The audacity of the folder’s name is leading some to question the legitimacy of the hack. Others are befuddled at the lack of fucks given at the Clinton Foundation, if in fact they were this blatant when naming their files.
There is much to comb through from this latest hack/leak of documents. The timing of this hack is interesting. Early this morning WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange lead many to believe he would deliver the “October Surprise” which would be information damning enough to cause Democratic Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton to drop out of the race.
The Guccifer 2.0 will be scrutinized by an army of eager investigators. Expect more information to come.
If you enjoy the content at iBankCoin, please follow us on Twitter
Trust ottnott, who wrote earlier: “None of the information he showed on his page appeared to have anything to do with Foundation activity.”
https://youtu.be/fSEpkcHUlm0
I bet you can’t guess what’s in my Pron folder.
Burn the witch. Amen.
What did Martha Stewart go to jail for, again?
It literally blows my mind that this she’s not living in a dark cell right now
Trump will get indicted for tax fraud and bribery if he doesn’t get elected. The evidence is straightforward, no conspiracy needed.
For actually deducting taxes off an actual $1B loss? Do you know how taxes work?
Really, a screenshot of a generic file folder system? This is what passes as hacking huh?
How about all the ‘damming’ info inside that folder Guccifer? It was a double click away and yet nothing is known of its contents?
Anyone else applying critical thinking to this farce?
It is super sketch…..
Either Guccifer 2.0 or Wikileaks actually has some dirt though. I’m sure it will make it way to centerstage in full form soon enough
If you were a lawbreaking citizen who found out Billions of dollars were being donated in exchange for policy, would you release the names of donors and amounts, or conceal that information for a very large price?
Certainly could be bogus as well, and equally likely is that was the folder where lawyers would be consulted with before proceeding to the next step to avoid breaking the law.
In other words, this seems to me to be a “threat” of sorts that more may be released unless certain “favors” (money, law changes, career path, etc) are made.
At a minimum, if you were Guccifer, you’d probably weigh your options before revealing and decide how much risk you’re going to take.
It is recycled DCCC material at best.
Guccifer previously posted DCCC material and claimed it came from Nancy Pelosi’s campaign.
Now Guccifer is claiming that it is Clinton Foundation material from “the private server of the Clinton clan”, a server that wasn’t used for Foundation business.
Avoid further disappointment and give up hope now on a Foundation scandal.
I’ve seen no substance in any of the attacks on the Foundation to date. This Guccifer thing is just a fraud committed against hopeful and gullible Trump supporters.
Nobody, not even her, can be that dumb to name a folder like that. WikiLeaks was a big fat failure also.