I know they do great work and have an eye for fraud. But what is your opinion of that firm, the way they destroy shareholder value with a singular blog post? To be fair, I suppose it’s no different from an analyst research note at Goldman or Morgan. However, not all short only research houses are created equally.
Due to the success of Muddy Waters, many copy cats have sprung up, especially on vagrant, low brow, website: Seeking Alpha. The perverts at SA don’t have a clue about stocks. I really believe many of them are rookie investors, trying to make a name for themselves by besmirching publicly traded corporations.
To be a successful contrarian is to be a genius. When markets are going lower, if you are able to muddle through it and make money on the long side: you’re a genius.
The same can be said about successful short sellers in run away bull markets. Those guys are insanely smart.
But the question I want answered is this: who is getting Muddy Waters’ research before it is published? Is it sold to selected hedge funds? Judging by the sudden drop in NQ today, I’d guess that answer to be NO. If the report was leaked in advance, the stock would’ve careened lower before the news.
Either way, this adds a very unwelcomed element to trading. It’s the equivalent to skipping through a minefield in a banana suit, while gorillas try to peel your skin off.
Comments »
