According to the hacker’s website, he was able to gain entry into the Clinton Foundation server and download “hundreds of thousands of docs and donors’ databases,” while inside.
Despite vehemently denying any association with Russia, mainstream media has done well to paint Guccifer 2.0 and others of his ilk as Russians.
The truth of it, as best we know, is these hackers are truth-seekers who go out of their way to provide transparency on important global matters.
Picking the USA President is viewed by many as important. Terms like ‘leader of the free world’ and ‘holding the keys to the nukes’ are often used, despite the post becoming more ceremonial than anything.
Nevertheless, hackers are hard at work uncovering the special interests behind Democratic Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. Donor lists show big banks and corporations agreed to donate a certain percentage of the allocated TARP funds to the Democrats.
It is unlikely these docuemnts will sway the vote of most. However, the good work of hackers like Guccifer 2.0 continues to raise curiousity about the financial interestes of the Democratic party, Wall Street’s party, the large global corporation’s party.
Carry on…
If you enjoy the content at iBankCoin, please follow us on Twitter
The posted spreadsheet looks…useless.
Guccifer calls it “master-spreadsheet-pac-contributions”, but it looks like a fragment of data copied and pasted from some other source.
The tabs aren’t named. There are column headers, but no tab/page headers. There are no formulas, no links to other tabs/spreadsheets/files/tables/etc. There are no subtotals or totals. Merrill Lynch is misspelled. The list includes only a small number of TARP recipients (though many of the major ones). There is only a small number of contribution recipients listed.
Looking quickly at the names in the “Member” column, they appear to be people who aren’t in competitive districts. I didn’t try to find out if they were related in some way, such as being members of a committee that oversees the financial industries.
Guccifer’s page isn’t clear about where the data came from. He starts out with the headline and claim that he hacked the Clinton Foundation server, but then makes these statements:
Hillary Clinton and her staff don’t even bother about the information security. It was just a matter of time to gain access to the Clinton Foundation server.
As you can see, the private server of the Clinton clan contains docs and donors lists of the Democratic committees, PACs, etc.
The private server used by Hilary Clinton was not the Clinton Foundation’s server. None of the information he showed on his page appeared to have anything to do with Foundation activity, though I didn’t follow his “link to some other docs”.
Forgot to add that went to opensecrets.org to check the donations of some of the Banks listed above. Not only did I not find the specific donations to the specific member — I wasn’t finding any donations in the time period when TARP was planned and rolled out.
I’m not confident that my opensecrets search results include every donation associated with the banks, but opensecrets sucks up all the donation data filed with the FEC.
Yes, several sources are questioning the legitimacy of it. But he got Debbie Shultz to resign so others are calling it legit.
Your claim that “Donor lists show big banks and corporations agreed to donate a certain percentage of the allocated TARP funds to the Democrats” is a slightly stronger version of Guccifer’s statement that “It looks like big banks and corporations agreed to donate to the Democrats a certain percentage of the allocated TARP funds”.
Neither statement can be drawn from the limited information on the spreadsheet. Neither the individual donations nor the total donations made by the banks on the list are a consistent percentage of TARP amounts.
We’re doing it live ottnott!
🙂