iBankCoin

Here’s Proof that Fundamentals Matter When Investing in the Stock Market

Technical analysis can be effective when swing trading — but is virtually worthless when constructing portfolios for wealth generation. This isn’t meant to be a sale pitch for Exodus — but it might end up sounding like one because I am going to demonstrate a way to use it to easily gain an edge in the market.

For those who don’t know, I had Exodus built in 2007-2008 to help me with my business. I used to spend countless hours scouring quarterly reports, working Excel spreadsheets. Then I came up with the idea to have a program do it for me — ranking fundamentals on a 1-5 scale. After that, I added technicals and then married them together, producing a ‘hybrid score’, which is a combination of both — leaning more to the technicals since it’s helpful when trading.

Technical analysis larpers will tell you that fundamentals don’t matter. I can prove to you they do.

Here are the year to date passive median returns using our fundamentals screener. We grade fundamentals by debt/eq ratios, PEG ratios, price to book, price to sales, and profit margins.

Over 4.5: +14.14%

4-4.5: +13.11%

3.5-4: +12.5%

3-3.5: +7.44%

2.5-3: +3.23%

The returns literally decrease with each rung lower in fundamentals — clear and concise proof that investing in well run companies really does make a difference. Then something interesting happened on our way into the sewers: returns exploded. The very lowest scores are filled with money losing Biotechs and Crypto-proxies, all of the wild small capped stocks that made outrageous runs towards the end of the year. The median market cap is just $345 million for this quintile. And I think it’s fair to say no one in their right mind would construct a portfolio with these type of stocks.

Under 2.5: +16.68%

How else can we use this data? Well, I use it just fine in my Quant portfolio. I take the highest returning stocks and profile them, reverse engineering their data to find stocks just like them — and it works. In other words, if value is working now and companies with PEs less than 15, dividends of 3%+, are running higher — I will know about it and can easily find a basket of stocks to match that criteria. This is top down analysis that is constantly searching for Alpha. This is just one layer of the onion, finding out that good fundamentals matter. After this, I’ll dig a lot deeper and eventually come up with a group of stocks that is superior to all others — using only quantitative means to guide my portfolio decisions.

This will be the only method by which I will manage money in 2018, using big data, predictive algorithms, and AI learning to give me a discernible edge over my competitors.

If you enjoy the content at iBankCoin, please follow us on Twitter

11 comments

  1. J Adabese (your pen pal)
    J Adabese (your pen pal)

    Really great stuff. How do you then determine the optimal holding period for current picks? Also, is guess too small % of stocks move 2 groupings either up or down in fundamental rank over the course of a year to be concerned with, but what about % that move 1 grouping up or down? Is there any alpha that can be gained by these ranking moves?

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
    • Dr. Fly

      Adabese

      I was using weekly holding period to test the results the past year. It did better than I expected. As a manager of other people’s money or self directed, it’s in your best interest to reduce churn and keep holding period longer. This year I will do monthly holds and we’ll see how it works.

      What do you mean with % of stocks move to groupings? Fundies get updated quarterly and if AAPL moves up to high, it’s fundy score will reduce and vice versa. Best we can do is monitor and make changes along the way.

      This much is simple: buying Exodus’ top rated stocks by fundamentals gives a clear edge.

      • 0
      • 0
      • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  2. masteroneass

    Make plan. Follow plan. Go speculate with extra. Good to see somebody is actually using a brain not just buying qqq etf.

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  3. dragun

    Good stuff! I found that monthly seemed top be the best time frame. Weekly too much churn as you said, quarterly can get you caught in a down draft.

    Package it in a fund or OM product and client won’t see the churn per se.

    Looking forward to more deets on your model.

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  4. moosh

    Le Fly, thanks for all of this money making machine you created and all, but what is the onion ring recipe? Hny all!

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  5. acehood

    Stocks with good fundamentals also have good looking technical patterns.

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  6. The Other Good Doctor
    The Other Good Doctor

    Do all the myriad fund and hedge fund managers use some similar proprietary fundy algorithms?

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  7. Phileo99

    Despite the preceived churn, the weekly holding period still managed to perform quite well, so why not keep it around at least as a point of reference?

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"