iBankCoin
18 years in Wall Street, left after finding out it was all horseshit. Founder/ Master and Commander: iBankCoin, finance news and commentary from the future.
Joined Nov 10, 2007
23,431 Blog Posts

Sessions Ends DACA: ‘Ending the Previous Administrations Disrespect for the Legislative Process’

No more unfettered illegal immigration. Contrary to crazy opinions, some people are illegal, especially those in the country without permission. As a citizen of America, I truly couldn’t care less about dreamers, as long as they work hard and contribute to the country. However, if I were a dirty handed career politician, I’d have a very difficult time reconciling a position to permit dreamers into the country, especially since they work against the best interests of the citizens of the country.

They take up resources and reduce wages. Ergo, they’ve got to go.

AG Sessions just rescinded Obama’a Dream Act.

What does that mean?

Not sure yet. What we do know is that government lured people into registering for this program, only to now have government armed with said lists that can be used to deport them.

How nice.

Judge Nap explains why Trump had to make a big fuss about this.

If you enjoy the content at iBankCoin, please follow us on Twitter

7 comments

  1. sarcrilege

    Just like government lured people into registering their guns…

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  2. Cricket

    Obama’s DACA was contradictory to the Constitution. On top of that it could be a back door for criminal street gangs. It had to go.

    Congress will pick up the ball now – something will be done. There are millions of legal immigrants who went through the system quite arduously. They are actually the most aggrieved by this situation.

    I believe that if they do permit the dreamers to obtain legal status, they should have a 25 year period before they have the right to vote. Stops undocumented Democrats from streaming across the border.

    Trump’s solution is the correct one. They must be stopped at the border, because the Supreme Court has ruled during the 1980’s that child aliens have a right to access public education and now, if challenged, no doubt would rule that they have a right to health care. In fact, from memory the Supreme Court criticized Congress for not having enforced the borders and instead passing the buck to the Courts.

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  3. bennyhill

    Fake News Alert, they do not reduce wages.

    • 1
    • 1
    • 2 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  4. traderconfessions

    Love this.. now small-minded Republicans will have to cast a public vote to kick out kids who are in the military, have fought for the US of A, are making great contributions to our country etc. Yes, send them back to a country they never knew. Thank you Jeff Beauregard Sessions for supplying the knife that will be used for so many self-inflicted wounds.

    The U.S. would lose about $460 billion in GDP over the next 10 years without DACA. Nice!

    • 0
    • 0
    • 3 Deem this to be "Fake News"
    • TJWP

      What part of “DACA allows them to enroll in social programs” makes you think this will be a cost to tax-payers. Are you arguing that people who have arrived illegally are net tax contributors (after draws on social programs)? Do you have any data to support this?

      Oh right no, just a fucking moron.

      • 3
      • 0
      • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"