You’re gonna love this ‘smoking gun’ story the WSJ just shilled — attempting to create another avenue for Robert Mueller to investigate.
Shane Harris should be ashamed of himself for such refuse.
Get this.
An 81 year old man named Peter Smith attempted to recover Hillary Clinton’s 30,000+ emails by scouring chat rooms and talking to hackers. The WSJ claims he might’ve emailed the Flynn’s once or twice — spoke highly of Flynn Jr., but ultimately was unsuccessful in finding the emails that Hillary erased from her server.
Wait there’s more.
Nah, just kidding. That’s all there is to it.
Here’s Chuck Todd talking to this animal Harris about his bullshit story.
Via WSJ:
Before the 2016 presidential election, a longtime Republican opposition researcher mounted an independent campaign to obtain emails he believed were stolen from Hillary Clinton’s private server, likely by Russian hackers.
In conversations with members of his circle and with others he tried to recruit to help him, the GOP operative, Peter W. Smith, implied he was working with retired Lt. Gen. Mike Flynn, at the time a senior adviser to then-candidate Donald Trump.
“He said, ‘I’m talking to Michael Flynn about this—if you find anything, can you let me know?’” said Eric York, a computer-security expert from Atlanta who searched hacker forums on Mr. Smith’s behalf for people who might have access to the emails.
Emails written by Mr. Smith and one of his associates show that his small group considered Mr. Flynn and his consulting company, Flynn Intel Group, to be allies in their quest.
What role, if any, Mr. Flynn may have played in Mr. Smith’s project is unclear. In an interview with The Wall Street Journal, Mr. Smith said he knew Mr. Flynn, but he never stated that Mr. Flynn was involved.
Mr. Smith said he worked independently and wasn’t part of the Trump campaign.
Mr. Smith passed away recently. Thank God he isn’t alive to learn about this nonsensical story.
If you enjoy the content at iBankCoin, please follow us on Twitter
So hearsay is now investigative journalism, according to WSJ. Great.
News of no consequence or importance is constantly debated, dissected and analyzed, and as we listen-in to the conversations of people around us, we will thereby realize that most are simply ‘robots,’ repeating as fact what they have heard on the news the night before.
https://tinyurl.com/y9gamhz3
~Zbigniew Brzezinski, ‘Between Two Ages’
More important words have never been written here. Zbig, of course, was correct. And add a bit of fear and you can get the heard to do all kinds of stupid shit. Our programmers realize this, I only wish more of repeating robots did.
Just look at that table of freaks. The token fat bitch. The pasty creepy sloppy fat faggot or not. The Grey haired old queer in “smart” glasses. And to top it off. Little Tiny Midget Chuck Todd. What fucking rock of doom do these minions breed under.
LMAO LOVE this comment.
I second that. There’s an SNL skit in there somewhere. Actually, what I just watched is the skit. Unfortunately, the retards at SNL would never mock these imbeciles.
“Under what Fucking Rock of Doom”
Instant classic !!!
George Washington University. Swamp Petri dish.
The long running CIA joke: bribing a journalist costs less than a prostitute.
Now that trump is clear of dnc witch hunt. He can be his true self.
Goldman does not control trump. Trump is trump again.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-06-30/trump-overrules-cabinet-prepares-unleash-global-trade-war
Yup, that damn leftie WSJ is making shit up again. Maybe you can borrow Ray Charles’ sunglasses if the glare of truth is too hard to bear.
Smith said he wasn’t part of the Trump campaign but was talking to Flynn…so what exactly is bogus here?????
BOGUS ??? That’s like, your opinion, man.