Tucker Carlson debated a former State Department official during the Obama years, David Tafuri, over Trump’s travel ban. Sadly, Tucker made quick work of him — reducing Tafuri into a smoldering heap of shit — blathering emotionally about how awesome Somalians are. Since I couldn’t give a flying fuck about any of the nations on Trump’s travel ban, I wondered if any of you good lads could ‘redpill’ be on why we should be permitting military-aged men from Somalia into America.
Tucker Carlson gimps out former Obama State Dept Official on Trump's travel ban. 'Tokyo and Beijing have zero terrorist attacks.' pic.twitter.com/Hb8D8Yj5s6
— The_Real_Fly (@The_Real_Fly) June 27, 2017
Here are the nations on Trump’s evil travel ban.
I’m quite malleable. Have at it.
BONUS! MSNBC ran out of things to talk about on ‘Hardball’ tonight, so they aired a repeat of ‘Trump’s lies.’ How delightful.
Yeah, I want to know too.
Only real reason I see is because our Deep State caused much of the BS going on in their countries. Let the womenz and kids come, leave the men home to rebuild.
Ron Paul’s lessons on blowback need not cause us to have to avoid all public spaces because a triggered Blue Stater wants a muzzie neighborhood.
I am pretty liberal but I don’t find it in myself to give a shit. I am fine with the ban.
Protection of life, limb and property is a pretty universal value among the entire spectrum of political leanings. No?
Only only reason from my perspective is to keep those camel jockeys out of ” my home and native land”
The pride Pm will have no problem importing a few more darkies. I wish Trump would bitchslap PMs trudeu. Ha
That is a old woman with a dudes wig on. Why are they all that way. In the O wtf were we thinking administration.
God damn it. I wanted liberals to redpill me, not you racist nazi fascists.
Why isn’t Saudi Arabia on the list?
Oh right.
Why isn’t Argentina on the list. Annoying happy e heads. Fuck all people that like to dance.
LOL
This interview is some blue pill horseshit. Trump’s policy of ‘we bomb you, we ban you’ is both bad for America and completely against what made this country so great once upon a time. One quick glance at the map shows this is not a muslim ban but a poor attempt at minimizing blowback from our ill-advised military adventures. Japan doesn’t see the blowback because they are not waging imperialist wars like NATO countries are. Of course we need to limit this blowback with thorough vetting, but a blanket ban is the wrong solution. If we wanted to keep terrorists out of the states, we would ban the Saudis first, but they are not even on the list.
This policy is even bad for our imperialist objectives as it prevents allied collaborators and defectors from coming to the country. Many of our best intelligence assets are cultivated under the promise of a future in the states after they aid our forces. Regardless of your views on our wars, this ban based on paranoia and a fear of blowback washing ashore does more harm than good to American interests.
This country was founded by refugees fleeing persecution and pursuing a better future, willing to rebel against their oppressive government. This country was further made great by our ability to capitalize on the creative and product capabilities of millions of immigrants. This is our plunder in modern wars as we bring home the best and brightest from overseas to keep our economy on the cutting edge of greatness. We must stop surrendering our freedoms for greater security from a threat that is created by our own government.
What did the Philippines do to deserve Islamic attacks? If you believe the Islamic attacks are blowbacks from our ‘adventures’, then wouldn’t it make sense to stop the adventures, repair relations, and close borders to those countries that mean us harm?
I get the idea that we were founded on immigration. But this isn’t 1700 and we don’t need pilgrims to settle the west. We are a bloated fucked country with fucked healthcare and a fucked political system. Last thing we need is a bunch of freeloaders interested in blowing up cafes.
We should help them there, not here.
We’re helping them there enough already…they just hate us for our freedoms and that’s why they want to be here. /sarc
Originally bluepilled, the now redpilled Professor Ricardo Duchesne, his thesis given the Doctoral Prize Award for best dissertation of the year, takes a more fact-based and nuanced view of immigration:
https://youtu.be/kusx1_wRsyQ?t=398
Who are we helping? Afghanistan? By far the biggest recipient of US foreign aid (for non-invasion purposes) is Israel, followed by our payoffs to Egypt and Jordan so they’ll be nice to Israel. Only crumbs go to the poor and starving.
Tell it to the Japanese dude who was beheaded by Daesh.
Your statement here, “Japan doesn’t see the blowback because they are not waging imperialist wars like NATO countries are.”
Is wrong.
Japan sees no terrorist activities because they prevent Islam itself from getting a foothold in their country and are pragmatic enough to enact measures to maintain their tranquility.
Trump didn’t bomb them. Obama and you fucking libshits did, more than any other president in history BTW – thanks Obama!
Once you bomb a country you are at war with them. That means you stop letting in military aged men (or all people if you aren’t a fucking liberal lunatic). The reason libtards want to bring in “refugees” is because refugees want welfare since they don’t (for the most part) possess the skills to be productive members of society (spoiler alert: those that have those skills have already come here legally as their countries are Islamic hellholes) which means they vote democrat. Its just rigging the vote by importing dependents all the while providing the perfect excuse for more state controls to clamp down on the violence your imported population brings.
Redpill this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LPjzfGChGlE
First you must define “bad for America.”
I’m not sure if I qualify as a liberal, I’m not even sure what that means any more besides a smear that is used against anyone that isn’t a Trump supporter.
The ban is reactionary, which is the definition of blue pill.
It is ineffective when measured against its stated goals. If there are baddies out there trying to get in from these countries, they are going to get in. It’s a farce that is playing to people’s emotions.
Symbolic. Marks a dramatic policy shift and moves the Overton window. Fought tooth and nail by the establishment progs and they lost. Immigration screening has been tightened across the board anyway (by executive order).
As much about public perception as substance and Trump has kept another promise to his supporters.
This is way more interesting and insightful into what Trump’s peeps care about..
http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/339628-trump-team-battling-disney-over-speech-in-hall-of-presidents
Now.. on the ban… don’t particularly care.. but why isn’t Saudi Arabia on list? Could it be that the Trump organized crime family does lots of biz with Saudis? Who do you think bought the shitty coops in the shiny Trump Tower? Arabs and Ruskies. Very swampy.
Why should Saudi Arabia be on this list? Are you anti-Muslim? In case you had not noticed, this ban is not a Muslim ban.
Why is Iran on the list? How many Shiite terrorists from Iran have attacked us? Saudis attack, so ban Iranians? WFT?
Your comment has merit Ferd.
But the solution is not selecting certain countries. Ban them all except those who are suffering true religious persecution.
And after those get here, mandate they must assimilate into our society by enrolling in language programs and learn to read and write.
My family, a few generations back, were Dutch, when they came here they held their church services in Dutch because that’s all they knew. As they learned English, they switched to English and left their Dutch culture behind.
They also worked their asses off clearing land, building roads, establishing farms out of the wilderness. They didn’t get any government help or freeload off welfare programs. There weren’t any. Even their women had hair all the way down to their balls. Not a snowflake in sight.
Because it’s based on religion and these countries have not been shown to be a threat on our soil. Fact: more Americans have been killed by white extremists than Muslims since 9/11.
Benny… Benny Benny, Islam is not a religion. It is a social and political control system.
Get that through your head.
If you want to put an ‘ist to it, it is Arabist. The Koran is in Arabic, youth religious teachings in the Madrasas are in Arabic, you must adopt an Arabic name when you become Muslim – and you cannot leave it. It carries with it traditional Arabic practices. It is the spread of culture, the Arab culture – and culture embodies values and norms.
I have nothing against the Arab culture, but it is not the American culture. The values and norms are incompatible in many many ways.
So don’t let them visit our country? Sounds like a great solution, lol.
Here is the other thing – ISIS recruits based on this shit – “look they hate Muslims they wont even let us enter their country because we worship Allah”. The ban makes us LESS safe.
This has nothing to do with not letting Arabs or Muslims visit or migrate. There are almost 2 billion Muslims in the world and some 1.8 billion of them will not be affected by this ban.
It’s about securing the citizens of the United States. Its about coming to grips with a way to vet visitors from war zones and countries known to harbor terrorists. It’s about trying to vet persons from countries that don’t even have a functional government, that don’t have control of records, that don’t have an operational identification system.