The Russian Ambassador repeated his talking points, regarding US atrocities in Iraq and how the Syrian strike was nothing more than a distraction from the events transpiring in Mosul. Moreover, he challenged the council to investigate the chemical weapons attack, which killed dozens of innocents in Idlib — for it will produce nothing but disappointment — proving their narrative is wrong.
RELATED:
BREAKING: Senior U.S. military officials say Pentagon looking into whether Russia participated in Syrian chemical weapons attack.
— AP Politics (@AP_Politics) April 7, 2017
NOTE: There are reports circulating that ‘tens of thousands’ of American troops are en route to Syria.
If you enjoy the content at iBankCoin, please follow us on Twitter
From sum old guy http://kunstler.com/clusterfuck-nation/bombs-away/
There’s an awful lot about the poison gas attack that doesn’t add up for the casual observer. It was only a week ago that the US enunciated a new policy that we would be content for Bashar al Assad to remain in power presiding over the Syrian government — after years of grousing and threats against him. Apparently Trump Central had concluded that Assad was a better alternative than another failed state in the Middle East with no government at all.
That policy change was a yuge benefit for Assad since it removed any pretext for US subterfuge or “black box” mischief against him. He was rather busy fighting a civil war, after all. Against whom? A mash-up of Jihadi forces ranging from Isis (so-called), to al Qaeda and Jabhat al Nusra, its spinoff gang dedicated specifically against Assad personally. Assad’s relations with Isis were ambiguous and complex. Isis had used Syria as a staging area for its operations next door in Iraq. It was rumored that Assad purchased oil from Isis. Yet Isis had participated in actions against Assad. In any case, all of the Jihadis were Sunni, in opposition to Assad’s Iran-leaning regime. Assad himself belongs to the Alawite sect of Islam, a twig on the Shia branch. Syria as a whole is a majority Sunni population, so Assad and his father Hafez before him (President 1971 – 2000) have represented a minority (12 percent) in an era of inflamed Sunni-Shia passions.
Trusting that your are not additionally confused by all this, why would Assad choose this moment — only days after the US granted him a pass on remaining in power — to do the one thing guaranteed to bring the wrath of the US down him, namely, kill a lot of civilians, including women and children, with poison gas? Either Assad is inconceivably stupid or possibly the gas attack is not exactly what happened.
Russia has claimed that Assad’s air force attempted to bomb a “rebel” (al Qaeda? Al Nusra? Isis?) ammunition depot that apparently contained supplies of Sarin nerve gas. Neither the US government or the American media has presented any arguments to counter that hypothesis. The New York Times banged the war drum as loudly as possible in the days after the incident. And now, of course, Trump Central has fired $60 million worth of cruise missiles at Assad’s main air force base. Assad’s spokesmen denied responsibility for the attack and the Russians are still asking for conclusive evidence via the UN Security Council.
The current incident appears to be — or was engineered to be — a replay of the August 2013 gas incident that left President Barack Obama looking weak and indecisive for not carrying out retaliation against Assad “crossing a line in the sand” against human decency. And so you have Mr. Trump, who may feel now that he cannot afford to appear weak and indecisive — above all other considerations, including the truth about what really happened at Khan Sheikhoun, Idlib province of Syria. So he bombed an airport, after warning the Russians to remove their personnel from the vicinity. In the event that the world ever does learn what actually occurred at Khan Sheikhoun, and the truth turns out differently than the current narrative, Mr. Trump can say, “We only bombed some Syrian air force infrastructure… no biggie… no women and children harmed.”
The outstanding question remains: what might have possibly motivated Bashar al Assad to turn upside down a situation of great advantage to himself mere days after he achieved it? It will be interesting to see if a credible response emerges from the hall of mirrors that US policy has become.
There’s no outstanding question. All questions were already answered. It was a false flag. That’s all.
I want to thank Fly, I learn a new word in these parts at least once a month. Latest edition, genuflect. Another favorite was, chicanery. There are too many to list.
Russia s boots on the ground and are probably in the best position to gauge what happened and who is behind it…..
it may have been Howard Bloom who was saying this isn’t a civil war in Syria but rather a proxy war between Saudi Arabia and Iran.
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/20/world/middleeast/iran-saudi-proxy-war.html?_r=0
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/asad-abukhalil/syria-proxy-wars_b_5874488.html
Preeeeeeeeetty sure he needs Congressional approval to move those troops. Cruise missiles different story. I think.
http://www.loc.gov/law/help/war-powers.php
For any curious.
Russia and China will veto any resolution going against Syria.
silver… oh my… what a move
LOL. down $0.26, -1.5%. yuuuge!
a 30 cent drop in the space of 5 minutes….you just looking at headlines?
happens all the time…paper ETF rigging…very much used to it…coin shop (Kitco) price unchanged.
Any link on the “reports circulating that ‘tens of thousands’ of American troops are en route to Syria”?