© Copyright 2007-2024 iBankCoin All rights reserved under penalty of bodily harm. DISCLAIMER: This is a personal web site, reflecting the opinions of its author(s). It is not a production of my employer, and it is unaffiliated with any FINRA broker/dealer. Statements on this site do not represent the views or policies of anyone other than myself. The information on this site is provided for discussion purposes only, and are not investing recommendations. Under no circumstances does this information represent a recommendation to buy or sell securities. DATA INFORMATION IS PROVIDED TO THE USERS "AS IS." NEITHER iBankCoin, NOR ITS AFFILIATES, NOR ANY THIRD PARTY DATA PROVIDER MAKE ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND REGARDING THE DATA INFORMATION, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE. Privacy Policy
A garbage article polluting the information stream.
For example, the article notes that:
“In its latest annual report, the Social Security board of trustees reported that the federal government’s total revenue from Social Security taxes in 2010—$544.8 billion—was not enough to cover Social Security’s total benefit payments—$577.4 billion.”
The same annual report notes that trust fund assets grew by $92.2 billion in 2010, but the garbage article is content to leave readers with the impression that Social Security is already running a deficit.
And what’s the point of excluding government and part-time workers when counting the number of people contributing, but including them when counting benefit recipients?
Garbage. Have some standards, please.
Probably including SSI Disability payments (widely gamed/abused).
Great beat ! I wish to apprentice at the same time as you amend your website, how could i subscribe for a weblog web site? The account helped me a acceptable deal. I had been a little bit acquainted of this your broadcast provided brilliant clear concept