Harvard University just released compensation data for their former investment chief, Jane Mendillo, and it was somewhat underwhelming according to a sundry of morons who think the university is underpaying for talent.
Ms. Mendillo received $13.8 million in her last year of employment, which ended in 2014. Moreover, the top six gurus pm’s at the endowment were paid $50 million in 2014, in spite of the fact that performance has been lackluster.
Under Jane Mendillo, the school produced an average annual gain of 10.5%, which ranks second lowest amongst all Ivy League schools.
“It seems like they’re not paying the market price for talent,” said Ge Bai, an assistant professor of accounting at Washington and Lee University in Lexington, Virginia, who studies compensation at nonprofits. “They’re paying extremely high bonuses to get mediocre performance.”
Alternative Assets
Really?
In addition to running a very lackluster endowment, Mendillo is on the boards of Lazard, The Andrew Mellon Foundation and GM. With exception to Mellon, the other two boards pay their members $250k per annum.
I have no problem with people getting compensated for doing a good job. I’m not Bernie Sanders over here, crying for the underclass to rise up and takeover the upper class, which would, essentially, drive this country into the ground. However, paying someone a salary of almost $14 million for performance that could be achieved in an index fund is just silly. She’s not to blame, naturally. The University itself are the fools who negotiated such a bad deal (extra Trump).
Comments »

