JP Morgan is out with meaningless research today, justifying their otherwise pointless existence in the research field. America’s most successful bank with endless resources have concluded Trump is bad and Hillary is good, when it comes to stocks. They believe the SPY will rise to 2,150 on a Hillbot3000 win — about 1.5% from present levels.
Here’s their analysis by the sector.
If, per chance, Trump somehow weasels his way into the White House, a most heinous experience is to be expected for equity lovers.
“We believe that if Trump wins, markets are likely to fall further — one should not use the Brexit template where stocks bounced quickly …” the note said, referring to the rebound shares made shortly after the initial panic that ensued when the United Kingdom voted in June to divorce itself from the European Union.
Indeed. Should Trump win stocks may in fact drop — with the profit margins of the globalist scum, mercenary, crony capitalist system of satanic devil worshipping pizza lovers.
If you enjoy the content at iBankCoin, please follow us on Twitter
Tom McClellan says his fancy indicators say Trump wins.
I am entertained at how they have Clinton as a negative for financials…
OT but remember last week about reports that members of the NYPD were disgusted by some of the things they had discovered?
Wonder if it somehow connects to this…
http://truthfeed.com/breaking-bombshell-multiple-reports-tie-clintons-podesta-brothers-to-child-abduction-case/34348/
That my man is very heavy. Apparently the Guardian UK had something on it but if you go the page has been removed. Your link worked though but when I accessed it I was selected for a survey of my ISP so this is quite racey indeed.
So Hillary is negative in 4 out of the 5 sectors, but Trump is only fully negative in 1 of the sectors (neutral, and positive and negative in two others), yet she’s the one who is the positive catalyst for markets vs. Trump? Fundamentals left the market long ago; now logic seems to be disappearing.