Yesterday my IQ was fucking soaring. I had everyone inside Exodus shitting their pantaloons thinking about all of the money to be enjoyed. Early this morning, it looked like it could go either way. Now I’m readily convinced my IQ will stabilize at around 34.
Some believe my IQ can get as high as 100, mainly because they’re “the Chinese Netflix.” But I tend to not think too hard about those predictions and instead focus, rather intently, on the short term. Impulsive, base, even craven thoughts permeate my psyche on a second my second basis — me against the world, destroying enemies, yada, yada, yada.
Meanwhile, Russia is being charged, once again, with hacking the elections. Rosenstein has indicted a dozen Russians and blamed their military for the victory of a certain Donald J. Trump.
Who’s looking forward to the 2020 elections!?
At any rate, my portfolio is down almost 100bps today and that’s quite all right, considering it was up 500bps yesterday. I’m flush out of cash, nothing but a tinned pot and happy memories to help me get by now, so say hello when you see me and if possible toss a few wooden nickels my way.
I’m awfully hungry and somewhat thirsty.
If you enjoy the content at iBankCoin, please follow us on Twitter
Go eat a sandwich.
Oh, it all makes sense now, “definite feeble-mindedness”
http://www.wilderdom.com/intelligence/IQWhatScoresMean.html
Mueller, after way more than a year and $20 million bananas, indicts Russian people who will never stand trial and he does so just as Trump is headed to meet Putin. Nope, no politics at play here, just pure coincidence.
I am very upset that you would question Saint Mueller and thereby shit on our system of justice, the FBI, motherhood and the Constitution.
For you I prescribe:
One hour of MSM daily.
(Take with a clear and uncritical mind.
Trust the reader.)
And Russia didn’t want Hillary win and lo and behold she didn’t. And Trump had no idea either way. No politics, just pure coincidence.
Not following your gibberish.
Assange said the DNC info’s source was not Russia. And tech experts said the DNC information had to have been downloaded on site …by a DNC insider. So why no investigation of those facts?
Instead we have an announcement timed to pressure Trump into stoking a dangerous cold war.
Assange’s smokescreen and random tech expert’s speculations become facts.
HaHa. Americans are so naive and gullible. It used to be charming.
“Americans are so naive and gullible.”
Ha. You’re correct. …although it’s ironic YOU should make that observation.
Well BA LMT ITA RTN aren’t going to go higher by themselves.
For “one-eighty,” when has Assange or his outfit been caught lying? Now ask that same question of the US news media and government.
I am retired from working in news. News organizations are often stupid, mistaken and outright wrong, but they don’t lie. Fox Spews is the only one that lies. Murdoch insists on it.
180, give me a break.
Of course they lie. Choosing who to quote and in what context ..who’s spin to promote, and who’s take on events to ignore – is lying.
Do they sit down every day and create facts out of thin air …no. But MSM (which includes Fox), knows which narratives will get them in trouble with powerful interest groups and so they promote all promote the company line. If they didn’t, they wouldn’t be MSM.
“Choosing who to quote and in what context ..who’s spin to promote, and who’s take on events to ignore – is lying.”
Nope. Its biased sure, but not lying. Fox actually broadcasts information they know is false and claims it is true. That’s lying.
They all walk the fine line between bias and lie and often cross over.
https://caitlinjohnstone.com/2018/07/14/two-big-russia-russia-stories-released-days-before-trump-putin-summit/
Is it possible that you simply agree with the non-Fox bs while you tend disagree with Fox’s bs and that this has created a large blind spot for you?
Anyway, reporting liars’ lies as if they are fact – is lying. Reading into news what fits your pre-conceptions is lazy and dishonest. I am merely lamenting that MSM news outlets and news people do not have the balls to be neutral questioners and investigators as opposed to spinners. Back to the two facts that I posted that sparked your reaction: “Assange said the DNC info’s source was not Russia. And tech experts said the DNC information had to have been downloaded on site …by a DNC insider.” I did not say that I accept Assange’s or the tech experts’ assertions, I merely asked that they be vetted on MSM …yet you lied and said: ” Assange’s smokescreen and random tech expert’s speculations become facts.” You likely didn’t even know that you read into my post something that I did not say ..because it fit your preconceptions.