A lot of feverish hatred in the comments section. By hatred I mean absolute silence of the deafening type — with Le Fly candidly bowling on fuckers from atop his steeply placed estate, up 14 out of his last 15 trades. I invite you to try to stop me, or dare I suggest challenge me to a stock picking contest. I will absolutely poleax you into another realm.
That being said, Admiral Fly made several bold moves today, plenty in the high beta, degenerate fields of the market. I closed out the session a winner — 10% cash, 100% win.
Markets moved up a bunch, breadth was weak, and most people got fucked today in fantastical ways — specifically because you’re not keeping up with the trends. The reason why you’re trading poorly is lack of information. You’re a low info invalid.
Time for me to fuck off.
Ciao.
If you enjoy the content at iBankCoin, please follow us on Twitter
No 200 Dow? No 300 Dow? Barely half a percent Nas?
wtf ppt. you suck. wtf ppt.
you suck. wtf ppt. you suck.
wtf ppt. you suck. wtf ppt.
you suck. wtf ppt. you suck.
wtf ppt. you suck. wtf ppt.
you suck. wtf ppt. you suck.
Just wait for the SOCIAL CREDIT SCORE DYSTOPIAN NETWORK arrives in this country after the COLLAPSE financial markets BANNED only manual labor no more parasitic jobs NO MORE MILLIONAIRES BILLIONAIRES.
GO LIZ!!!
You just reminded me of the slogans “shovel ready” and “green jobs”.
“China is demanding that President Donald Trump not only eliminate a round of tariffs scheduled to go into effect in mid-December but also wants him to lift another substantial round of penalties imposed in September”
– https://www.politico.com/news/2019/11/04/china-trade-tariffs-trump-065669
So here’s a question: just how desperate do you think Donald is? In other words:
will he give up all the US cards for basically nothing?
While you consider that, think about this:
1) 2019: bascially, Republicans ahve given up trying to convince normal Americans that there was no quid-pro-quo. Outside of the Zelensky transcript, there is a lot of evidence and testimony that the arms sale, Biden, and Counterstrike investigatiosn were tied together with a lot of help from Giulianni. The latest Republican defense: “it is about corruption, not investigating a political opponent.” Of course, given his relationship with Putin, Netanyahoo, and other strongment, this seems laughable on the surface.
More to the point, with the prior Ukranian president, Proshenko, it seems liek the opposite was true: they wouldn’t send Javelin anti-takn missiels to the Ukraine unless the Ukraine **stopped** a corruption probe. This time, the proeb was on Manafort, and after speaking with Guiliani, Ukraine stopped cooperating with Mueller’s investigation.
https://medium.com/@PortlusGlam/rudy-giuliani-met-with-ukrainian-president-poroshenko-twice-last-year-while-being-paid-by-their-18662963600c
I really don’t care that much if Turmp illegally used Trump campaign funds to pay for the silence of a porn start, but using **tax payer** money for his re-election campaign and against the interests of the United States of America is pretty much the definition of treason. Will be interstign to see how this plays out in Turmp land, especailyl among the Seantors. Now some of them such as Lindsey Graham are attached to Trump “Human Centipede” style. Still, while I don’t see Turmp getting voted out by 20 Rs, if 10 of them turn on him that pretty much trashes hi re-election campaign.
another lose-lose for Turmp:
https://www.cnn.com/2019/11/01/business/murray-energy-coal-bankruptcy-pension/index.html
Retired coal miners are pretty much his core voting group:
– white
– male
– old
– rural
– working class
– extraction industry
versus:
Robert Murray
– Billionaire
http://inthesetimes.com/features/murray_energy_trump_doe_coal_industry_grid_plan.html
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/09/climate/coal-murray-trump-memo.html
https://money.cnn.com/2018/01/09/investing/coal-ceo-ferc-murray-trump/index.html
He’s already tried to help his Bilionaire buddy, but now Trump has to pick sides.
Numbers, you really need to get beyond corrupted MSM narratives …or at least when you regurgitate them here, try to write with the cogency of the original.
Transltion: “I don’t like waht you are saying, so i’ll attack the source of your message rather than dispute the facts at hand.”
So I’ll repond just as uselessly:
“you need to watch less Hannity or listen to less Limbaugh”
Simple narrative:
1) Guiliani goes to Ukraine to tell them to stop investigating Trump’s ex-campaign manager for corruption
2) Ukraine agrees and Javelin missile deal goes through
(allegation, but we do know guiliani met with the Ukraine right before the javelin approval)
3) Guiliani goes to Ukraine to tell them to re-start investigating Trump’s political rival for corruption
4) Whistleblower exposes deal and Trump releases Ukrain aid
So what’s wrong with above?
The whole Biden/Hunter thing is a story of it’s own, but the point remians that the ONLY foreignb corruption Trump has been intersting in investigating just happens to be agaisnt oen of his biggest ploitical rivals