iBankCoin
18 years in Wall Street, left after finding out it was all horseshit. Founder/ Master and Commander: iBankCoin, finance news and commentary from the future.
Joined Nov 10, 2007
23,474 Blog Posts

Wikileaks Shoots Down the Notion that the FBI Could’ve Parsed Through 650,000 Emails in Eight Days

The former Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, Commander of the Joint Functional Component Command for Intelligence, General Flynn, took to Twitter to question how the FBI could parse through 650k emails in 8 days. The common narrative amongst so many Hillbots is that computers can do shit quick.

This is a random tweet amongst a sea of shit that I plucked out from the universe.

Nevermind the fact that the FBI took over a year to parse through 55k emails the first go around, before concluding that Clinton had literally done nothing wrong. I suppose, since then, we’ve developed new technologies to help us complete that work in a fraction of the previously performed time.

Flynn asks

Wikileaks, being the preeminent publisher of documents in the world, offered their expert advice for those trying to credit fucking computers with this amazing achievement in forensic document analysis.

FUCK NO.

wiki

QED.

If you enjoy the content at iBankCoin, please follow us on Twitter

12 comments

  1. mistermoe

    Julian Assange will have his day on the Catherine Wheel.

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  2. ironbird

    Elon Musk is God. And Solar will get us lunatics or maybe just him to Mars? And Huma is a hottie.

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
    • joyous__ending

      Huma a hottie?
      Depends on your taste in women.
      If you brought her to my house for my Christmas party and then invited me to the Spring wedding…..I would toast you big time.

      • 0
      • 0
      • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  3. speedius

    Let’s assume that duplicate emails can be very quickly verified. So, why in the fuck would you make an announcement before doing that verification unless it was politically motivated?

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
    • metalleg

      They could have spent 8 years and it doesn’t change the fact that he covered for Hillary. We don’t need to prove that you can’t properly review 650,000 in 8 days to prove that she is being protected.

      • 0
      • 0
      • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  4. pptsd

    I said it once and will say it again, its a nothing burger. The fox is guarding the hen house. There will be no justice here unless by some miracle T wins. While not a fan of the man, I give him props for slugging it out against this total cluster we call a free democracy.

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  5. kdog

    So who is telling the truth anymore…

    https://www.wired.com/2016/11/yes-donald-trump-fbi-can-vet-650000-emails-eight-days/

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  6. boyaj

    My question is that if the FBI went through 55K emails in the past and found an additional 650K, then doing some quick math, if the new batch are either duplicates or non related state material, all 595K of those are assumed to be personal??? They would’ve had to go through 595K emails to see if they pertained to the investigation.

    I do understand and can believe that 55K emails could be identified and confirmed as duplicates, but what about the to other 595K? This is what’s fishy to me.

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  7. roundwego

    The fuckery gone wild. Bi-polar market is manic now but depression is coming.

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  8. og

    Snowden says you can.

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"