If you’re a republican, this is a completely bird-brained attack on the GOP front runner, Donald Trump. In today’s bizarre and scathing rebuke of Trump, Romney called him a ‘con-man’ and imbued the discussion with the trifecta of toxic GOP-political horseshit.
1. Trump is somehow appealing to the KKK; therefore, if you vote for him, you are a Klansman.
2. Trump is hiding like a squirrel. It’s obvious that his tax returns are fraudulent. Moreover, if released, it will reveal a great crime. TRUMP DOESN’T DONATE TO CHARITY AS MUCH AS HE SHOULD, ESPECIALLY VETS. Ooh. Shots fired!
3. Trump is a liberal in GOP checkered pants clothing. It’s evident by the fact he is, once again, hiding information from you, this time in the form of a NY Times interview that has him saying all sorts of scandalous shit. It’s rumored he said he wasn’t that serious about immigration. It’s all part of his parlour trick to be the Commander in Chief, something that’s on his bucket list of things to do in this lifetime.
This screed is nothing short of GOP hari-kari, throwing their best chance at Presidential winship by the wayside because, quite frankly, a Hillary Clinton win is more appealing to the oligarchy of big republican business, than the disrupter, Donald Trump. This attack isn’t intended to stop Trump from winning the delegates needed to become the GOP candidate. His nomination, according to the laws of math, is already a foregone conclusion. This attack is geared to grease the old and corrupt wheels of the Clinton attack apparatus, giving them red meat to throw into the crowd during future interviews and public speeches.
The two party system is looking more and more like one giant party hell bent on fucking the American people at every bend.
If you enjoy the content at iBankCoin, please follow us on Twitter
Indeed. Thinking this back fires hard. No one listens to Mormons they are a fucking crazy cult.
Supreme Fuckery
(shouts from corner) Trump – For – V – P
(those in power now i believe will have more ‘influence’ over the election than anyone may think)
This ex-Clinton staffer getting immunity is not good news for Hillary. Her spokesman said they asked this Pagliano guy to give answers to Congress in the fall, but this dude ends up pleading the Fifth. Now that he has immunity and clearly has no issue going rouge from Clinton, it sets up for an interesting next few months.
It’s also mind boggling that this is where we’ve gotten to in regards to the most powerful position in the world. We’ve got a guy who calls everyone losers and idiots, gets accused by his own party for being a KKK supporter, and the leaders think he’s toxic. Then, we’ve got the former Secretary of State with a ton of luggage herself; not limited to her being reckless with emails and Benghazi, which people haven’t even began to touch.
The fact anyone would vote for Trump certainly shows we’ve failed in the education department. Needs moar funding asap.
as an outsider, its been coke and pepsi to the point of boredom. even the prospect of Obama was dull. However, now a distinct possibility of great entertainment: Trump. If I could vote, it would be for Trump no question. The Clintons have lived in the White House for 8 years already, shame on any further Clinton influence.
You nailed it.
What. Is. Going. On?????
Romney is a liberal in GOP solid pants clothing. there, fixed it.
I don’t think he is a liberal. But he is sure making us liberals look good. He is just clueless & out of touch with the real world that most Americans live in. His own close associates in his own little bubble think his speech is great. Everyone else thinks it sounds like an ad for Trump.
If there really was anything scandalous in the New York Times tapes, they would have already been leaked. Who’s kidding who. As for his tax returns, until Mr. Trump is the candidate why on earth would he release them? Romney’s just being childish IMHO
So long as the Republicans fight candidate against candidate, so long will they be a little people, a silly people – greedy, barbarous, and cruel, as you are.
The most outrageous thing is that some of the things Romney criticized are Trump’s strong points. I am voting for whoever the Dems nominate, because I think that person will be the lesser of the evils we are being offered.
But to put down Trump for telling the truth that GW Bush made a colossal mistake in getting us into Iraq on the basis of false information? That’s practically a Trump advertisement.
And Romney says that Trump thinks we should let ISIS take out Assad in Syria and then we should go in and pick up the pieces. I am no expert in foreign policy but that sure makes more sense to me than what the U.S. is doing now– putting ourselves right smack into the middle of Syria’s civil war, where one fifth of the population already having exited the country as refugees– running for their lives after Assad slaughtered their friends, relatives and neighbors.
Romney must be totally clueless, to make an anti-Trump video that ends up looking like a pro-Trump advertisement.
Traditionally even the best politicians, intent on being public servants, have in the U.S. had to sell themselves out to some corporate donors in order to get elected– and then in other areas, where they are not bought and paid for, they can perhaps do some good. That is Hillary’s theory and she is correct in that. So I think she’s doing the best she can. Trump isn’t doing that, nor is Sanders– but that is why they will not end up being elected. She is correct that that is necessary.
Of course it should not be necessary. We need to overturn Citizens United and have campaign finance reform, and do everything else necessary to get back to government of the people, by the people, for the people.
For me it all comes down to SCOTUS appointments. Trump is a batshit crazy reality show star, he could wind up nominating Honey Boo Boo’s mom. Just imagine this fuckwit’s cabinet. Palin for Sec. of the Interior (“drill, baby, drill!”); Kardashians in the White House, durrrr…
Quite possible.
Hillary’s campaign motto should be: I’m not perfect but these other people are insane.
I do think that the GOP is trying as hard as they can to stop Trump, but it isn’t working. Because they are clueless as Romney is, about what their voters respond to. I think they will try to have a brokered convention and then nominate someone else that way. But that won’t work if Trump has the required number of delegates to begin with.
As a liberal, I hope the GOP nominates Romney, one of the most clueless people on the face of the earth. Piece of cake to beat in a general election, as Obama has already demonstrated.
This Romney thing is a desperate hail-mary from the old boy republican cia military industrial complex of world domination trying to enlighten us, the unwashed masses, why we should continue to let them run the show, collecting billions while they throw us a few crumbs and we can all continue to pretend with their faux-democracy ,,, I’d like to think their kind’s days are numbered … not that I am a democrat and as bad as they are, they are the lesser of the evils but they still take their orders from their republican moneyed masters .. just look at how pathetic Obama is .. a useless military industrial complex puppet
We’ll have to agree to disagree on that one. I think Obama did great at everything he could do. The Deep State, including the MIC, is not something presidents can influence. The last one who tried was JFK and you can see how he ended up. The president doesn’t tell the Deep State what to do. The Deep State tells the president what to do. Of course, we need to change this.
Here is a book that just came out 2 months ago describing this little understood situation.
http://www.amazon.com/Deep-State-Constitution-Shadow-Government/dp/0525428348/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1457051872&sr=8-1&keywords=Deep+State+Lofgren
Just shut the fuck up. You child.
No one needs to read your insults. If you have nothing constructive to say, then you shut up.
Of course Presidents can influence the MIC/Deep State and they must try, even if they can only changes things by an iota.
Trump thinks we should let ISIS take out Assad in Syria and then we should go in and pick up the pieces. I’m still thinking about this. And I can’t see anything wrong with the idea myself. Someone call John Kerry and suggest it to him.
That’s like letting the Iranians take out the Saudis or the Iraqis .. Anyone have a problem with that ?
Maybe whoever is going to take out whoever in the Middle East, we should just let the people in the Middle East do what they are going to do. Because when we try to control things, we fail anyway, and things are worse off than before, like in Iraq. And we certainly haven’t helped things in Syria, where 1/5 of the population fled for their lives, after Assad slaughtered their neighbors.
Maybe we should just get out of the M.E. and let the M.E. take care of their own problems, instead of getting in the middle of other nations’ civil wars.
We could still negotiate and give help of various kinds. But we don’t need to stand between groups of people having a civil war and blow things up.
We think we can pick the winners and losers we want to pick. And then we have to stay in those countries forever, because as soon as we leave, there is a power vacuum. And the people we picked to be winners can not stand up on their own.
We should just let the regimes that have the support of their people stand and stay out of their military business– just assist in negotiations, diplomacy, education. Maybe give some economic aid instead of buying and supplying weapons. Some guys in the M.E. seem to be terrorists because they don’t have any other jobs.
Did Trump make a weiner joke tonight in the debate?