Rice shortages is an inside job.
If you enjoy the content at iBankCoin, please follow us on Twitter
Joined Nov 10, 2007
23,433 Blog Posts
© Copyright 2007-2024 iBankCoin All rights reserved under penalty of bodily harm. DISCLAIMER: This is a personal web site, reflecting the opinions of its author(s). It is not a production of my employer, and it is unaffiliated with any FINRA broker/dealer. Statements on this site do not represent the views or policies of anyone other than myself. The information on this site is provided for discussion purposes only, and are not investing recommendations. Under no circumstances does this information represent a recommendation to buy or sell securities. DATA INFORMATION IS PROVIDED TO THE USERS "AS IS." NEITHER iBankCoin, NOR ITS AFFILIATES, NOR ANY THIRD PARTY DATA PROVIDER MAKE ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND REGARDING THE DATA INFORMATION, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE. Privacy Policy
Don’t bite the hand that feeds you.
food control has been an inside job for a while, there’s plenty of food in the world for everyone, the machine controls the flow however…
The most expensive diet known.
Bak from Bastan. Fuck bike rider’s running marathons.
Down with Sam Adams and Ben Franklin and Mother Goose.
The fear trade has now turned from terrorism to food.
“is” = “are”. damnit, fly.
Fer Gahd’s sakes booey! The plural takes the plural predicate!
“Rice shortages are an inside job,” ya daft buffoon!
Now whar ‘r thoose knookles?
Food shortages are an attempt to slow down global growth.
The result is to allow time for some economies to pass the liquidity crunch.
At the same time global growth is blamed for shortages and limit up on all comodities to mask real inflation through the debasing of currency.
Yes you live in the Matrix.
Fly is using a grammatical construct known as “notional agreement”. In this case, you should understand that “the recent phenomenon of rice shortages”, taken as a singular concept, is the subject of the sentence, rather than a plural collection of shortages.
In Latin, this concept is known as constructio ad sensum.
PS: Every time I read about rice shortages, I get hungry for rice, so I go to my well-stocked pantry. There I have ample supplies of 5-6 different varieties of rice. And I cook up a batch. Tonight it was sushi or “sticky” rice. I sit down to eat, and I think about how much it must suck to eat “mud biscuits” instead of fresh, delicious rice. Then I resolve to make a donation to a charity that feeds the poor, but I usually fall asleep on the coach before I get around to it. Am I going to hell?
(Note to self: Increase GW’s tinfoil prescription.)
We dyin ova heah. We dyin! Rice cost too much! Stupid Amelican Yankees grow corn fo der ethanor fo autos. Need to stop using corn for fueah and use it to feed peepo.
Soory, ya snappy wastral, but with noo context, thar’s noo grounds for a nootional agreement intent. Ah’ll have booth ‘v yer knookles bloodied, an’ yes, yer goo’in ta Hail fer shoor by cracky!
‘An no moor Lahtin outside tha Maahs, ya wiseacre!
Fuck you Thesaurus and the equine you rode in on.
Jake I do not get the reference….my best guess is a crack pipe?…help me out here.
You know you and I are the opitome of separatism. It is quite funny how we arrived at these places looking over at one and other.
Fuck you. The sentence structure, while being somewhat cumbersome, is flawless.
Go back to your third grade English class.
Yo, it should read:
See, we got plenty of rice, but the man is keeping it for his self.
Why, ahhl slap the shite outta yah, coorsin’ like ya did atta noon!
Atch! Now look whuttyave meade me doo, coorsin’ meself, I am!
I’m off to Confession, and I be sure’n advise the seem fer yoo, me bucko!