iBankCoin
The first hit is always on the house.
Joined Aug 2, 2009
1,847 Blog Posts

UNLEASH THE FURY $MTCH

$MTCH up 6% for no other reason than that Dave and Tom over at Fool.com suggest this stock as a buy. Glad we beat them to it.

If you enjoy the content at iBankCoin, please follow us on Twitter

38 comments

  1. Jon V

    Glad I was buying on that down 5% day

    Picked up BIIB today at $266+. Another super cheap stock.

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  2. Jon V

    I saw your comment about those earnings plays. What are your thoughts on SDRL? I’m contemplating putting a small amount at risk that I’m willing to lose 100%. Seems like a firecracker type stock. If they get an extension from their lenders (which I would assume they will given they are still operating at a profit) then I could see it double easily.

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
    • Option Addict

      No opinion, really. Already exploded through the pocket…not much of a pattern, IV at 150%.

      Doesn’t fit the mold I have success with, but doesn’t mean it can’t work.

      With volatilty that high, it suggests that everyone has high expectations here. When that is the case, I want to be the one to sell you those options.

      • 0
      • 0
      • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
      • Jon V

        Gotcha. I don’t play options so just looking at the stock.

        • 0
        • 0
        • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
        • Option Addict

          Scary! How do you trade stock over earnings? Easier to have defined risk, no?

          • 0
          • 0
          • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
          • Jon V

            My defined risk would be capped by what I’m willing to lose. Let’s say it’s a 1-2% position that I’m ok with losing completely (realistically I wouldn’t completely lose it).

            • 0
            • 0
            • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
          • Option Addict

            So, if you buy an $18 dollar stock, and you were willing to lose $1k, you’d buy 50 shares?

            • 0
            • 0
            • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  3. JewishMantis

    An option question if I may for OA… You bought KMI May options today. 1) If the earnings are on 4/20 why go so far out if youre playing the earning call itself? 2) You bought them before the weekend. Won’t premium be sucked out somewhat vs. buying on Monday for example? 3) Is that because the closer you get to earnings the more expensive the options will be ?

    Sorry for the newbiness of the questions. I can wait for AHWOA if its a pain to answer it here. Thanks as always

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
    • Option Addict

      Bought them yesterday, and not playing the announcement alone…but the residual movement that will follow as well.

      Would you think the stock would hit $24 on earnings? Not totally realistic…but how about the next 30 days?

      • 0
      • 0
      • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
    • nocturne

      Agree with OA’s analysis. As an accumulator of KMI from just below the convertible debt offering at 31ish down to 14ish (chose not to buy the leg sweep down to 9ish) I am expecting a move to 24 and eventually 29 to 32 assuming no disastrous news and oil and gas keep flowing and need to be stored … and they need to keep being paid for that. Reasonable for this to happen before the end of the year.

      I accumulate small and increase the amounts I buy on the way down.

      • 0
      • 0
      • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  4. mk

    OA posting blogs on Trading Addicts, moving off IBC?

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  5. Hawaiifive0

    Wish I hadn’t already sold. MTCH

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  6. bushwacker2

    Very entertaining!

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  7. Z

    Whoops – left a few options comments about earnings plays on the article below this one – didn’t see this was the most recent article. I would say arguably the best earnings bet before a report is a strangle. I can’t say how many times I was absolutely convinced a stock would move in a certain direction after earnings but to be safe I also bet small on the other side and then came out a good winner or a big winner because what I thought couldn’t happen, happened. Repeating what I said on the other blog entry – most recent biggest example was GOOGL this past summer. Thought for sure that although it had been going up big before earnings – it was going to disappoint on earnings. Had the call side on though in addition to the put side to play it safe and hit it big when it skyrocketed after earnings. Another quick example – GRPN this past fall. I was pretty convinced it would go up big after earnings but had small puts in addition to calls to play it safe and did fairly well when it was pummeled. The list could go on. In agreement with what Jeff said – of course – the key is to bet what one might understandably lose completely without really damaging overall capital since of course the stock might not move much at all after earnings. Tied in with the latter point – one of the keys then is selecting to play those equities which have a history of moving big on earnings and/or are set up to possibly move big after their reports.

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
    • Option Addict

      Strangle is the worst play. Both premiums get crushed. Lowest probability trade out there.

      • 0
      • 0
      • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  8. Z

    I would respectfully disagree. As someone who has done well playing strangles, I have seen people lose big just playing one side and all they had to do was reduce their bet a little on one side and use the money they took off to play the other side as protection. I could give hundres of examples over the last few years but just quickly – let’s take Disney this past summer. Someone betting one thousand with call options on the long side into earnings would have lost all that money. If he or she had reduced his or her bet to 700 on the call side and then put 300 on the put side – he or she would have walked away with at least 3000 dollars on the put side even though it was not the side he or she thought would win. And of course – he or she would have still won if they had been correct on the long side.

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  9. Z

    Or take NFLX tonight. How many people will just choose to play one side but yet they will say “I just know this will move big one way or the other?” Okay – well then if they just know it is going to move big one way or the other – they should arguably have a bigger bet on the direction they think it will go but a smaller bet on the other direction so if it does move big – they will win no matter what.

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  10. Z

    For the record though – I agree with you that for almost every equity out there – they will not move enough to justify playing both sides. I am referring to ones with a history of big liquid movement after earnings. In the end – a better play is probably to wait until after earnings, see the intraday direction, and then load with puts or calls in that direction for a quick in and out play.

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
    • Option Addict

      So you are cherry picking examples to fit your thesis. Math suggests this is the worst trade in the book.

      • 0
      • 0
      • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
      • Option Addict

        The majority of the time, the expected move is priced in to perfection prior to the outcome. If the stock moves as much as expected, less than expected, or only slightly more than expected, you lose twice. You have to get lucky to make money. Horrible strategy.

        • 0
        • 0
        • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
        • traderconfessions
          traderconfessions

          Looks a little late to buy now. It will come back a few bucks. I don’t like such thinly traded stocks but others here don’t mind.

          • 0
          • 0
          • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  11. Z

    And I should add – have read your blogs for years – great calls – especially liked the call to load up on X calls a few summers ago. I agreed and was loaded to the gills and held through its great report that summer.

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  12. kidstockibc

    Congrats guys on a big week…might be a bit choppy this week but expect more of the same.

    TSLA looks like its going to challenge 275 this week…get some.

    I like AGN on the downgrade and FCX in the low 10’s.

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  13. kidstockibc

    GRPN about to rip

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  14. traderconfessions
    traderconfessions

    Bought SEDG. Tight wedge and tight range for nice risk/reward buy.

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  15. k_melancon

    I picked up some June KMI 20 calls this morning – was hoping to get a better price this morning with the drop in oil, but it started rallying quicker than I expected.

    Conference call for KMI earning is Wednesday after the close.

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  16. Marc

    OA..Helene Miesler, technician at Real Money, wrote a piece over the weekend using the sentiment chart you have been referring to over the past year, believes we are in the Anxiety phase. FYI

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  17. ammy hour

    Anyone looking at ANIK? Thinly traded but good looking chart and growth

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
    • traderconfessions
      traderconfessions

      Looks a little late to buy now. It will come back a few bucks. I don’t like such thinly traded stocks but others here don’t mind.

      • 0
      • 0
      • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"