Joined Nov 11, 2007
31,929 Blog Posts

A Mortgage Bond Boom Isn’t a Housing Recovery

“The new issue of Bloomberg Markets magazine looks at the year’s best-performing hedge funds. Topping the list are several that have invested in mortgages, led by the 38 percent return at Deepak Narula’s Metacapital. Within this winning category there are funds that invest in Fannie and Freddie-backed mortgages, and (believe it or not) in subprime. For everything there is a price and a time.

Housing has risen this year, with a 4.3 percent gain in the S&P/Case-Shiller home price index. As is usually the case with housing, it doesn’t take much for the word “recovery” to start getting tossed around. Don’t confuse mortgage bonds with housing. The Big Picture’s Barry Ritholtz has several times charted the long run view of home prices, and they’re still above the historical average relative to household income. (Standard & Poor’s Co.’s David Blitzer shows them slipping below historical norms compared to per capita income; with changing family sizes, that’s  the wrong measure.)

Narula gives some detailed insight into his strategy, and it’s worth reading for the view it affords not only into his fund, but into the housing economy. He’s gained with bets that mortgages would rise relative to Treasury bonds, and that fewer debtors would be able to refinance than the U.S. government hoped.

That reveals some painful truths about the housing recovery. Low rates have made housing relatively more affordable … for those who haven’t been locked out of the market by credit standards that are much tighter than they were even before the housing boom. The winners in a concerted Federal effort to keep housing afloat are banks, investors, and the limited group of homeowners who’ve been able to finance purchases at low rates….”

Full article 

If you enjoy the content at iBankCoin, please follow us on Twitter