I am getting dizzy. In all fairness, I don’t buy Blodget’s argument that something MUST be wrong because BAC is lashing out. It’s a damned if you do, damned if you don’t scenario, where bears point fingers NO MATTER WHAT. What exactly did Blodget want BAC to say?
If you enjoy the content at iBankCoin, please follow us on Twitter
© Copyright 2007-2024 iBankCoin All rights reserved under penalty of bodily harm. DISCLAIMER: This is a personal web site, reflecting the opinions of its author(s). It is not a production of my employer, and it is unaffiliated with any FINRA broker/dealer. Statements on this site do not represent the views or policies of anyone other than myself. The information on this site is provided for discussion purposes only, and are not investing recommendations. Under no circumstances does this information represent a recommendation to buy or sell securities. DATA INFORMATION IS PROVIDED TO THE USERS "AS IS." NEITHER iBankCoin, NOR ITS AFFILIATES, NOR ANY THIRD PARTY DATA PROVIDER MAKE ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND REGARDING THE DATA INFORMATION, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE. Privacy Policy
(laughter) Blodget claims he’s a BAC shareholder. If it’s true, is that the companies new policy towards its owners?
With shareholders like Blodgett there would be no need for an annual SH meeting. I can still his face on CNBC in the .com era just lying through his mug.