The significance of Obama’s efforts to drag Israel in the mud, just prior to leaving office, is magnified by the fact that he knows Trump doesn’t agree with his position. If Obama truly wanted to exit the White House gracefully and with honor, he’d hold off the dogs at the UN from passing a resolution designed to humiliate Israel. Instead, he crafted the damned resolution himself and then sent his attack dog, John Kerry, to make all sorts of scandalous statements to the press — in one last ditch effort to toss Heinz ketchup bottles at both Israel and Trump.
Trump reacts to recent Obama comments and derides the lack of ‘seamless’ transitioning of power.
Doing my best to disregard the many inflammatory President O statements and roadblocks.Thought it was going to be a smooth transition – NOT!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 28, 2016
Trump defends Israel and tells them to ‘stay strong’, a bit melodramatic, but you get the gist.
We cannot continue to let Israel be treated with such total disdain and disrespect. They used to have a great friend in the U.S., but…….
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 28, 2016
If you enjoy the content at iBankCoin, please follow us on Twitternot anymore. The beginning of the end was the horrible Iran deal, and now this (U.N.)! Stay strong Israel, January 20th is fast approaching!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 28, 2016
Chuck,
Are you disappointed that Trump didn’t take the side of isis, AlQaeda, Hezbulla, Hamas, palestinian Islamic Jihad, Fatah, and the rest of the head choppers that hate the tiny Jewish state?
Butt P,
It is clear that Trump or any normal person is not a friend of ISIs.
However it seems they have some friends who are not normal folks.
Regards
Chuck Bennett
“The significance of Obama’s efforts to drag Israel in the mud, just prior to leaving office, is magnified by the fact that he knows Trump doesn’t agree with his position.”
After 4 years, if there is a new incoming president, are you going to bash Trump if he refuses to give up his own policies? If he refuses to act against his conscience? If he Trump then continues to do what he believes is right, without asking the permission of the incoming president, will you bash Trump then too?
If you are fair, rather than just habitually bashing Obama/Democrats and habitually praising Trump/Right Wingers, then you will bash Trump if he does exactly the same thing during his last few weeks in office.
If you are Tribal, the rules are:
My tribe is good no matter what we do.
Your tribe is bad no matter what you do.
If you are Fair, then the rules are:
An action is good or bad, regardless of who does it.
Even leftist CNBC called it:
“Palestinians Celebrating 9/11 Attack”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oMOZvbYJMvU
I’m pretty sure the Trump Administration will start their first day without keyboard keys for the computers in the White House.
From the wikipedia page named Reactions to the September 11 attacks
“Yasser Arafat and nearly all the leaders of Palestinian National Authority (PNA) condemned the attacks and attempted to censure and discredit broadcasts and other Palestinian news reports justifying the attacks in America,[25] with many newspapers, magazines, websites and wire services running photographs of Palestinian public celebrations.[35][36] The PNA claimed such celebrations were not representative of the sentiments of the Palestinian people, and the Information Minister Yasser Abed Rabbo said the PNA would not allow “a few kids” to “smear the real face of the Palestinians”. In an attempt to quash further reporting, Ahmed Abdel Rahman, Arafat’s Cabinet secretary, said the Palestinian Authority could not “guarantee the life” of an Associated Press (AP) cameraman if footage he filmed of post-9/11 celebrations in Nablus was broadcast. Rahman’s statement prompted a formal protest from the AP bureau chief, Dan Perry.[37][36]
“Annette Krüger Spitta of the ARD’s (German public broadcasting) TV magazine Panorama states that footage not aired shows that the street surrounding the celebration in Jerusalem is quiet. Furthermore, she states that a man in a white T-shirt incited the children and gathered people together for the shot. The Panorama report, dated September 20, 2001, quotes Communications Professor Martin Löffelholz explaining that in the images one sees jubilant Palestinian children and several adults but there is no indication that their pleasure is related to the attack. The woman seen cheering (Nawal Abdel Fatah) stated afterwards that she was offered cake if she celebrated on camera, and was frightened when she saw the pictures on television afterward.[38][39]”
Frog that was always Arafat’s modus operandi. Say one thing in Arabic and say the total opposite in English to fool westerners. He did it often. This is analogous. Those celebrations were real. The footage was real. They pass out candies and celebrate whenever a bomb goes off in Israel too. It’s really old news.