iBankCoin
18 years in Wall Street, left after finding out it was all horseshit. Founder/ Master and Commander: iBankCoin, finance news and commentary from the future.
Joined Nov 10, 2007
23,426 Blog Posts

NBC Unnamed Source Says Putin Directly Involved in Hacking of American Presidential Elections, Due to ‘Vendetta’ Against Hillary

Let’s crystallize what the media is attempting to do here. Through the revelations of the DNC leaks and the Podesta emails, the American people learned how corrupt the democrats were and how they’ve coopted the media on every level to the point where the major networks are nothing more than state media shills.

Instead of addressing and trying to correct their ill behavior, they’re doubling down on it by blaming the whistleblower and then fomenting hatred against Russia — by accusing them of interfering in our elections because of Putin’s personal ‘vendetta’ against Clinton. It’s equal to a pedophile being caught with unseemly material on his computer and then getting mad at the police for finding it.

Bottom line, democrats, you’re still pedophiles. I meant that anecdotally of course (no Pizzagate).

Here we are, once again, bearing witness to the democrats trying to overturn a democratically elected President and attempting to start World War 3 with a country who has nearly 8,000 ICBMs in their arsenal, using unnamed sources, and zero evidence to do so.

By simply stating ‘the Russians did it, obviously’, isn’t enough evidence to overturn American elections and certainly not grounds for a war that would cost the lives of millions.

Are these people insane?

This from NBC.

U.S. intelligence officials now believe with “a high level of confidence” that Russian President Vladimir Putin became personally involved in the covert Russian campaign to interfere in the U.S. presidential election, senior U.S. intelligence officials told NBC News.

Two senior officials with direct access to the information say new intelligence shows that Putin personally directed how hacked material from Democrats was leaked and otherwise used. The intelligence came from diplomatic sources and spies working for U.S. allies, the officials said.

Putin’s objectives were multifaceted, a high-level intelligence source told NBC News. What began as a “vendetta” against Hillary Clinton morphed into an effort to show corruption in American politics and to “split off key American allies by creating the image that [other countries] couldn’t depend on the U.S. to be a credible global leader anymore,” the official said.

Ultimately, the CIA has assessed, the Russian government wanted to elect Donald Trump. The FBI and other agencies don’t fully endorse that view, but few officials would dispute that the Russian operation was intended to harm Clinton’s candidacy by leaking embarrassing emails about Democrats.

The latest intelligence said to show Putin’s involvement goes much further than the information the U.S. was relying on in October, when all 17 intelligence agencies signed onto a statement attributing the Democratic National Committee hack to Russia.

The statement said officials believed that “only Russia’s senior-most officials could have authorized these activities.” That was an intelligence judgment based on an understanding of the Russian system of government, which Putin controls with absolute authority.

Now the U.S has solid information tying Putin to the operation, the intelligence officials say. Their use of the term “high confidence” implies that the intelligence is nearly incontrovertible.

“It is most certainly consistent with the Putin that I have watched and used to work with when I was an ambassador and in the government,” said Michael McFaul, who was ambassador to Russia from 2012 to 2014.

“He has had a vendetta against Hillary Clinton, that has been known for a long time because of what she said about his elections back in the parliamentary elections of 2011. He wants to discredit American democracy and make us weaker in terms of leading the liberal democratic order. And most certainly he likes President-elect Trump’s views on Russia,” McFaul added. Clinton cast doubt on the integrity of Russia’s elections.

As part of contingency planning for potential retaliation against Russia, according to officials, U.S. intelligence agencies have stepped up their probing into his personal financial empire.

American officials have concluded that Putin’s network controls some $85 billion worth of assets, officials told NBC News.

Neither the CIA nor the Office of the Director of National Intelligence would comment.

Enough with the accusations. Let’s see the actual evidence, or shut the fuck up.

If you enjoy the content at iBankCoin, please follow us on Twitter

34 comments

  1. gappingandyapping

    Its so fucking comical. Everyday my intel analysts literally laugh at how crazy this has gotten and how politically driven it is. The intel community has a big flaw when it comes to conclusions when people meddle in the conclusion. I could literally infer to my team that I think the Chinese “hacked” our SAP server and exfilled the data for the end goal of capturing all of our employees inside mobile execution vans. I can guarantee you that within a couple days they would have piles of data supporting that conclusion stacked sky high on my desk. Any time you ask an intel team to find out if “XYZ” hacked something and they know you are looking for that XYZ to be the culprit they will make it look that way. Just look at what happened when Bush “wanted” to find WMD in Iraq. It pushed analysts in that direction and spurred them into finding evidence to support that outcome. Bottom line, this is all bullshit, the Russians did not hack the DNC, period. There is simply no evidence to support this other than Guccifer 2.0 using a Russian VPN provider. If such other evidence exists then someone better start producing it, otherwise its all a lie.

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
    • bain

      ^. This.

      • 0
      • 0
      • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
    • vandamme

      Prove the Russians didn’t do it, pal.

      • 1
      • 0
      • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
      • gappingandyapping

        You just proved my point, you can’t 100% determine attribution with the information that we have. You can only make “guesses”. What we do know is that Kim DotCom knew well over a year ago (almost 2 years) that Wikileaks had access to the emails, he came out and said it both in a tweet and an interview. We know he certainly wanted her to lose since she signed his extradition warrant right after the FBI fucked up and took down Mega Upload. So it is certain that he had a hand in doing it and provided the timeline, well before D. Trump announced he was running. Do a little research, I do this for a living everyday, I am just giving you a window in.

        • 0
        • 0
        • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  2. gappingandyapping

    Best article by far with the evidence laid out https://theintercept.com/2016/12/14/heres-the-public-evidence-russia-hacked-the-dnc-its-not-enough/

    • 0
    • 1
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  3. it is showtime

    Intricate discussion is not needed to know the reason is to cultivate larger themes. Weaving elements together, creating possible truths. The clouding the narrative motive itself undermines credibility

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  4. 12jc

    If you consider the magnitude of corruption and scheming that was exposed by the leaked emails, is there really anyone out there who would want these people to be in control of the government? Are they really your preferred leaders? How can you really be that pissed off that they were exposed for who they really are?
    This information would have never come out without the hacked emails that Wikileaks received and subsequently released. Whomever the hackers were, they and Wikileaks did us a favor. Is the messenger really the problem here?

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
    • gappingandyapping

      I think you answered the question, the goal is to shoot the messenger right now. When there is butthurt everywhere they have to deflect it to something/someone else.

      • 0
      • 0
      • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  5. sethster99

    Why isn’t the media trying to find out why Comey did what he did? The Podesta e-mails were not the big story that pushed Trump over the top, it was the fact that the head of the FBI said that he “may” have evidence of Hillary committing a crime with 2 weeks left before the elections. Then a week later he says there’s nothing to be alarmed about and that it was a false alarm.

    That is the big news here… Why hasn’t it been exposed as to why he did that?

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
    • cancel19

      Correct! The chess game they are playing with our lives and livelihoods is unreal!

      • 0
      • 0
      • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
    • ironbird

      There is no “media”. Probably never was in the case of facts or worth. Take any bloodsucker profession that creates literally nothing and you will simply find a propaganda tool. Lawyer politician media financial advisor lobbyist etc etc etc. The only question is how amazingly long it took the brainwashed to wake the fuck up to the scam. Obamacare was the final nail.

      • 0
      • 0
      • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
      • bennyhill

        “Take any bloodsucker profession that creates literally nothing”

        You mean like traders who sit in trading rooms and buy and sell 4 letter tickers all day?

        • 0
        • 0
        • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
    • frog

      Because we know exactly why he did that. He wanted his party to win. It worked. Don’t forget the terror attack warning for the day before the election. What else is there to know?

      http://www.cbsnews.com/news/sources-us-intel-warning-of-possible-al-qaeda-attacks-in-us-monday/

      • 0
      • 0
      • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  6. badduck

    Do I still have to make mortgage payments during a thermonuclear war?

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  7. LP

    Seems the goal is to make it as if the Podesta emails and all are inadmissible evidence to the American public, as if we are a courtroom. The cat is out of the bag. Even if they succeed and prove he they are behind information release, so what! We aren’t voting again.

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  8. chuck bennett

    Comey did to because he was trying to do his job ? Get us off the topic of more egregious matters? Or perhaps because he knew she was evil?

    Clearly these people are nutz.

    We might find out one day soon

    Regards

    Chuck Bennett

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  9. Dr. Fly

    Gap is the only authority on this subject on this board, being a top level expert on security. The rest of you shills should listen more, speak less.

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  10. metalleg

    Not only do they know who hacked the emails, they also have the motive.

    It was a vendetta.

    Whoever said you can’t make this stuff up was wrong. You certainly can and they certainly did.

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  11. stockslueth

    “I saw Putin typing at the keyboard.” – American Spy

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  12. bennyhill

    You guys need to get out of your houses once in a while. Get away from the computer terminal where you buy and sell 4 letter tickers for a meaningless living and go talk face to face with other humans. You have seriously distorted and biased perspectives, thanks to your right wing conspiracy Facebook friends and Brietbart rss feed.

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"