Fuck off mainstream media. I love how the media is getting people worked up about being racist cucks, at the same time promoting Islamic headwear to be a symbol of trendiness and acceptance, instead of what it really is — oppression.
Here’s a commercial in Germany promoting this nonsense. And here is the deranged Covergirl mental patients promoting the hijab, in addition to the FIRST EVER Coverboy transgender fuckery.
The bedraggled microbes at the heads of our media companies are so stoned on narcotics, so deranged from living incorrect lives, they’ve gone full tilt into Sodom and Gomorrah territory — attempting to blur the lines of gender. This campaign is failing, miserably, as evidenced by a populist rebuke — most recently displayed through democratic elections. However, they won’t understand the consequences of their actions until it hits them where they care most: right in their fucking transgendered balls (aka wallet).
Here’s CNBC shit posting in Asia tonight, promoting ‘Millennial Money’ via ‘Modest Fashion’ aka the explicit re-oppression of women.
Fuck off CNBC. Women are special, much prettier to look at than men wearing lipstick — or hidden under some fucked up theocratic garb.
If you enjoy the content at iBankCoin, please follow us on Twitter
Outstanding post Fly. Thanks
Print it out and place it under your neighbors doormat
Short ULTA and get long cotton.
LOL! Good one!
although I disagree a little that women are special, I do enjoy the cognitive dissonance gymnastics some of these media and politicians have to do to try to justify the “freedom” these women exercise in being oppressed by their patriarchs and foreign cultures.
Can’t wait for them to roll out Gloria Allred in one of these. Then we will know without a shadow of a doubt that all the libs have gone off the deep end.
Dollar ridiculously overbought here, weekly candle ended well above the upper Bollinger Band. Looking back 20 years on the weekly chart, the dollar has never had a weekly candle entirely above the upper Bollinger Band. Time to short UUP.
The inferior sex must be restrained by the trash bag. “Freedom” of a cult and all.
1.5 billion of these lunatics is the going Okey Dokee scam. Why not. So popular.
Since when is head covering purely Islamic?
The Mother of Jesus (Mary) is almost always depicted having her head covered. Nuns cover their heads do they not?
1 Corinthians 11. (King James Version)
5-6 But every woman that prayeth or prophesieth with her head uncovered dishonoureth her head: for that is even all one as if she were shaven . 6 For if the woman be not covered , let her also be shorn : but if it be a shame for a woman to be shorn or shaven , let her be covered .
10 For this cause ought the woman to have power on her head because of the angels.
13 Judge in yourselves : is it comely that a woman pray unto God uncovered?
1 Corinthians 11 (New Revised Standard)
5 but any woman who prays or prophesies with her head unveiled disgraces her head—it is one and the same thing as having her head shaved. 6 For if a woman will not veil herself, then she should cut off her hair; but if it is disgraceful for a woman to have her hair cut off or to be shaved, she should wear a veil.
10 For this reason a woman ought to have a symbol of authority on her head, because of the angels
13 Judge for yourselves: is it proper for a woman to pray to God with her head unveiled?
Up until the 1970’s – didn’t most women in the Western World wear scarves? If you travel through Italy, Albania, Poland, and indeed many countries where there still exists strong Christianity, head scarves are still worn.
SHILL. This is specific to Sharia law. Fuck Off.
Am not a shill, was a valid question.
Why only look at it from a Sharia point of view? Why not consider all angles including the Christian one? Or is this targeted at only one religion?
If you are going to lay in judgement, at least do it fairly otherwise what is the difference between you and the “false media” which you are so riled up against.
Mohammed on the covering of ones head —
“And if you, whether man or woman, enter a house or a country then greet in a seemly (commensurate) wise those who are within it; and if you are wearing a cover on your head as you enter and at the greeting, then remove it from your head and thereby show that you have freedom and dignity, therefore you shall do the same; and if you have covered your face, then remove the covering when you enter a house or a country so that the others may recognise (see) your uprightness; and cover your head and your face from the light (rays) of the sun, against the weather (influences of the weather) and against sand and storm so that your skin and your head (brain) are not harmed and do not sicken; but never cover your head before gods and tin gods and before people of your kind (human beings) who demand the same from you, because it is disgraceful to have to cover your head in submission; and therefore do not cover your face before people of your kind (fellow human beings), because covering the face means concealing evil defilement or unright; therefore go forth and wear your covering for your head and your face if the condition (situation = sun/weather conditions/sand/ storm) demands it, but do not allow yourselves to fall into submissiveness through wearing coverings for your head and face.”
Juice:
Tis a little difficult to read; What point are you trying to make please?
Thank you.
Madness, the above is exceedingly clear and needs no interpretation from another, from an Imam, a holy roller, a false prophet, a priest, etc. to tell you what you can figure out by your lonesome through your own naturally-given and personality-developed intellect, logic and rationality,.
The point being made is Mohammed never required the covering of ones head.
In Fact, he said it an be disgraceful to do.
Was it not clear?
Regards
Chuck Bennett
Chuck Bennett:
Question is did the above ruling come before or after the rulings that state it is preferable to cover ones head? Just like in law, laws can be superseded so without knowing the true Exegesis, the above text has no context.
Anyway, my question referred to why there is never an outcry on the uniform nuns are supposed to wear? The covering of their heads, is that not oppression too?
Nope, it was not clear. The above text also referred to covering of face so I was trying to gain clarity as to what exactly the point being made was.
Thank you.