At 6am, Joe Scarborough criticized the manner in which the new NBC/WSJ was conducted — which was pre-debate. When the show replayed at 8am, that criticism vanished. Poof.
Source: Legal Insurrection
In regards to the actual pre-debate poll itself, as Zerohedge points out, it’s entirely flawed. The sampling of the poll included much more democrats than republicans, so of course it’s going to be skewed in favor of dems — not to mention the poll was conducted by a Clinton operative — who has made campaign contributions to one of Clinton’s super PACs.
In the post debate poll, the same polling organization gave Clinton a 9 point lead. Again, if you asked more Yankee fans if they preferred the Yanks over the Mets, the results will almost always skew in the Yankees direction.
Here is the breakdown of the polling sample.
In summary, the democratic operatives at Hart Research Associates conducted this NBC/WSJ poll sampling 44% democrats, 37% republicans and 12% independents — which resulted in Clinton pulling way ahead by 7 points compared to the previous poll. Do you see how one might construe this polling data to be corrupted?
Hate for deep state and killary only grows with each attempt to rig the system.
Man. The scary part. 90% chance they will do it anyway. Then boom goes the dynamite. Like those jackasses walking over hot coals barefoot because some snake oil salesman made the sale. It is a clinical delusion of safety.
Not to mention that all this could ultimately lead us to President Kaine…
Not that who’s president really matters anyways in Oceania