A tour de force–masterpiece. My favorite part:
I, for one, am not interested in defending a system that for decades has served the interest of political parties at the expense of the people. Members of the club—the consultants, the pollsters, the politicians, the pundits and the special interests—grow rich and powerful while the American people grow poorer and more isolated.
No one forced anyone to cancel the vote in Colorado. Political insiders made a choice to cancel it. And it was the wrong choice.
Source: WSJ
Let Me Ask America a Question
On Saturday, April 9, Colorado had an “election” without voters. Delegates were chosen on behalf of a presidential nominee, yet the people of Colorado were not able to cast their ballots to say which nominee they preferred.
A planned vote had been canceled. And one million Republicans in Colorado were sidelined.
In recent days, something all too predictable has happened: Politicians furiously defended the system. “These are the rules,” we were told over and over again. If the “rules” can be used to block Coloradans from voting on whether they want better trade deals, or stronger borders, or an end to special-interest vote-buying in Congress—well, that’s just the system and we should embrace it.
Let me ask America a question: How has the “system” been working out for you and your family?
I, for one, am not interested in defending a system that for decades has served the interest of political parties at the expense of the people. Members of the club—the consultants, the pollsters, the politicians, the pundits and the special interests—grow rich and powerful while the American people grow poorer and more isolated.
No one forced anyone to cancel the vote in Colorado. Political insiders made a choice to cancel it. And it was the wrong choice.
Responsible leaders should be shocked by the idea that party officials can simply cancel elections in America if they don’t like what the voters may decide.
The only antidote to decades of ruinous rule by a small handful of elites is a bold infusion of popular will. On every major issue affecting this country, the people are right and the governing elite are wrong. The elites are wrong on taxes, on the size of government, on trade, on immigration, on foreign policy.
Why should we trust the people who have made every wrong decision to substitute their will for America’s will in this presidential election?
Here, I part ways with Sen. Ted Cruz.
Mr. Cruz has toured the country bragging about his voterless victory in Colorado. For a man who styles himself as a warrior against the establishment (you wouldn’t know it from his list of donors and endorsers), you’d think he would be demanding a vote for Coloradans. Instead, Mr. Cruz is celebrating their disenfranchisement.
Likewise, Mr. Cruz loudly boasts every time party insiders disenfranchise voters in a congressional district by appointing delegates who will vote the opposite of the expressed will of the people who live in that district.
That’s because Mr. Cruz has no democratic path to the nomination. He has been mathematically eliminated by the voters.
While I am self-funding, Mr. Cruz rakes in millions from special interests. Yet despite his financial advantage, Mr. Cruz has won only three primaries outside his home state and trails me by two million votes—a gap that will soon explode even wider. Mr. Cruz loses when people actually get to cast ballots. Voter disenfranchisement is not merely part of the Cruz strategy—it is the Cruz strategy.
The great irony of this campaign is that the “Washington cartel” that Mr. Cruz rails against is the very group he is relying upon in his voter-nullification scheme.
My campaign strategy is to win with the voters. Ted Cruz’s campaign strategy is to win despite them.
What we are seeing now is not a proper use of the rules, but a flagrant abuse of the rules. Delegates are supposed to reflect the decisions of voters, but the system is being rigged by party operatives with “double-agent” delegates who reject the decision of voters.
The American people can have no faith in such a system. It must be reformed.
Just as I have said that I will reform our unfair trade, immigration and economic policies that have also been rigged against Americans, so too will I work closely with the chairman of the Republican National Committee and top GOP officials to reform our election policies. Together, we will restore the faith—and the franchise—of the American people.
We must leave no doubt that voters, not donors, choose the nominee.
How have we gotten to the point where politicians defend a rigged delegate-selection process with more passion than they have ever defended America’s borders?
Perhaps it is because politicians care more about securing their private club than about securing their country.
My campaign will, of course, battle for every last delegate. We will work within the system that exists now, while fighting to have it reformed in the future. But we will do it the right way. My campaign will seek maximum transparency, maximum representation and maximum voter participation.
We will run a campaign based on empowering voters, not sidelining them.
Let us take inspiration from patriotic Colorado citizens who have banded together in protest. Let us make Colorado a rallying cry on behalf of all the forgotten people whose desperate pleas have for decades fallen on the deaf ears and closed eyes of our rulers in Washington, D.C.
The political insiders have had their way for a long time. Let 2016 be remembered as the year the American people finally got theirs.
If you enjoy the content at iBankCoin, please follow us on Twitter
He’s a thug and a hypocrite. Letterman exposed him for his buy America rant when his own clothes were made in foreign lands, he really has no foreign experience, and is a walking embarrassment. What specialist would want to report to him. Icahn even said no to him last year.
If he’s so maximum, where are his tax returns, please explain his record bankruptcies, his numerous out of court settlements when he said he never did so? C’mon Mr. Fly, you know better than this guy.
Fuck off. Fag.
FIG
Maybe in some bizarro world being a billionaire is failure. However, when you’re one of 400 of the top persons of wealth in the world, out of 7.5 billion, it is the essence, the very definition of monetary success.
Moving on, tax returns? Please. Fuck the IRS.
This isn’t about any of that stuff, friendo. This is about putting america first, nationalism, and fucking the establishment who’s had it good for so long.
You and your friends better brace yourselves. A storm is coming.
Trump is a successful businessman but a fuckin’ lying sleazeball at the same time. These aren’t mutually exclusive. The fact that you can’t distinguish between the two is amazing to me. He couldn’t give a shit about the “people”. He is marketing what he thinks people want to buy. Spend some time researching the criminals and shit holes he goes into business with and then tell me that’s the guy you want running our country. Start with the SOHO Hotel story.
Yes, our political system is awful. But ruining the country to punish it is just ignorant.
It’s a mistake, or just a weak rhetorical strategy to think/claim that folks that don’t support Mr. Trump are aligned with the establishment.
That’s like saying folks that don’t like stepping in dogshit don’t like dogs.
PS In this analogy Mr. Trump is the dogshit.
Never called Trump a Failure. He’s just a real life, real rich version of Barney Rubble – I honestly believe that if he was President he’d resign in midterm and say “It’s not worth it.” He IS better than the Dems, I grant you. I’ll be surprised if he wins. I have no expectations from him.
Ironbird, with that reply – you’re just too sophisticated for me.
Is that all you have? Sounds like a winner when compared to everyone else. Except Bernie of course.
Regards
Chuck Bennett
Indeed. Bernie could take it all in a landslide.
It may not be enough for you, but it tops “Fuck off. Fag.”
Some of the comments from Mr. Trump’s supporters really undermine the claim that they are a peaceful, reasonable group.
Confession, we’ll tell you the SOHO Hotel Story if you tell us the VINCE FOSTER Story first. Thanks.
Anything can happen in those caucuses. Party leadership can have the thing rigged, with cronies running the agenda, ballots disappearing and appearing out of nowhere, and the results pre-determined.
Trump has allowed Cruz to out-organize him, get to the party apparatus, and take over the caucus systems. Trump has no ground game.
Budh
That’s party line bullshit, an excuse to steal. That’s like saying, after I just robbed you of your gold chain and gold teeth “Fly had a better ground game than me; therefore, he deserves my gold teeth.”
You know damned well I don’t deserve your gold teeth.
QED
Trump got caught with his pants down.
He was clueless about how the primary election works and he thought he was so damn smart and so damn good he could just figure it out on his own on the fly [no pun]. He isn’t and he can’t.
He is equally clueless about a lot of important things a President needs to be aware of.
I’m all for changing the primary system into something more democratic, but find a safer and saner and more direct way of going about it.
We don’t need to put a bumbling blowhard in charge of our country just to reform the primary process for one political party.
To start off, I have to congratualte Trump’s speech writer on this letter (for those that think Trump actually wrote it himself, it’s obviously not his style as evident that the only time the word “great” or similar superlative was used was in the phrase “great irony,” which is a great irony in and of itself).
I’m in the boat (Ark?) with traderconfessions and longview: just because Trump’s letter accurately point out the problems, does not mean that Trump is the solution. Trump speaks against a powerful monority, but not for the majority of the US as evident by his sky-high disapproval ratings. Even within the Republican party, New York will likely become the *1st* state where Trump actually gets more than 50% of the vote..
Also, people forget that the Democrat and Republican Parties are private organizations. As
a Republican National Committee member Curly Haugland correctly stated:
‘Political parties choose their nominee, not the general public.”
The problem is not the way the parties elect their candidates (insider politicing and superdelegates notwithstanding), it is the fact they we basically have a two-party system. The internal problems of these Parties are good for the country in the long term as they weaken the Parties and people’s faith in them. Every year that the number of registered Republicans and Democrats decreases is a good year – let the good times roll.
Putting a billionaire in the presidency is putting a fox in charge of the chicken coop.
Billionaires get their dough by fucking the people and taking more than their share. Its a basic fact of life.
Adjusted for inflation, George Washington was the richest man to be president.
Silence
That’s true, of course, but please let that be the last comparison of Mr. Trump to George Washington. Though Washington was a man of his time and place (read “slave owner”), Mr. Trump is not worthy to clean Washington’s wooden dentures.
However [political parties] may now and then answer popular ends, they are likely in the course of time and things, to become potent engines, by which cunning, ambitious, and unprincipled men will be enabled to subvert the power of the people and to usurp for themselves the reins of government, destroying afterwards the very engines which have lifted them to unjust dominion. -George Washington
Silliness. The people that are in bed with govrnment and use their influence to pass laws to suppress competition and bankrupt businesses are a different story…
But in a free market, profit is a reward for providing a good or service that no one else does at prices no one can compete with, or convincing people they need something more than others…
People vote with their dollars which products and companies succeed.
If you’d like to live in a nation where prosperity and billionaires never existed, might I suggest traveling back to the Stone Age before any innovation existed? Enjoy hunting for food daily with a rock, trying to gather nuts and berries by hand.
Or perhaps just travel to Nicaragua. There are probably no billionaires there to speak of. I’m sure you’ll enjoy your time in a 3rd world country.
If nothing else both Trump and Bernie have exposed this country. I’m really surprised just how brain washed so many folks are too.
Indeed. In Bernie’s America the site would be called, “I Break Up Bank Coin”
Trump appeals to the dark side in all men, some can resist some can’t. He careens from event gone wrong to any controversies he can drub up. Now he claims a Colorado process that he lost (because he was unprepared) was rigged.
Trump is the equivalent of a political ambulance chaser. Come July he will be discarded and forgotten to the dumpster fire of failed and phony political candidates.
Even former el prezidente of this bandanna republic agrees with le Trump as well as le Fly
http://yournewswire.com/jimmy-carter-the-u-s-is-completely-subverted-by-oligarchs/
After major-league sports, real-estate development is probably the most oligarchical business in the US.
Let’s get a billionaire from that field to save us from the oligarchs.
My mistake — the casino business is even more oligarchical than real estate.
To be safe, we should try to find a savior who comes from both fields.
precisely!
Isn’t it staggering that there aren’t any riots at Hillary rallies? How any man (not guy, man) in this country can feel she deserves to be president blows my mind. Trump, Trump, Trump.
Monsieur Fly, with all due respect, if I want your gold chain and gold teeth and I take you down to get them, then I do deserve them. It’s the risk I’m taking. Yes it’s thuggery and it has many faces and forms. I’m not a thug. I choose civility and non-violence.
I have my own gold chain, 22k, this makes me think long and hard about what went into bringing me that gold chain and should I keep it.
The courts would rule otherwise and most would disagree.
vampyr, “deserve” implies a moral backing and justification. By that twisted logic, there is no end to the horric crimes with victims that “deserved” what happened to them. Unless you are truly on the moral side of child molesters and genocidal dictators, I’d be more careful with word choice.
Any idiot who thinks they deserve the gold chain that they steal from a surprised victim though guile or assault, certainly deserves the sharp steel or lead that they might get instead if they make a bad choice of their intended victim.
Donald Trump is speaking up for a maligned and slighted slim majority of the population that is still too polite to be very proactive or forceful in defending themselves against the very real forces that have been working to bring them low over the course of the last forty years- but travesties like the ‘election’ in Colorado last weekend are helping to wake this majority up to the reality of what is being done to them, and how far past the point of no return the United States has actually been led.
If this real majority were to ever really, finally, awaken in anger, it might be a very bad choice of potential victim indeed for the cowards that have been working for so long to appropriate it’s golden chains…
To start off, I have to congratualte Trump’s speech writer on this letter (for those that think Trump actually wrote it himself, it’s obviously not his style as evident that the only time the word “great” or similar superlative was used was in the phrase “great irony,” which is a great irony in and of itself).
I’m in the boat (Ark?) with traderconfessions and longview: just because Trump’s letter accurately point out the problems, does not mean that Trump is the solution. Trump speaks against a powerful monority, but not for the majority of the US as evident by his sky-high disapproval ratings. Even within the Republican party, New York will likely become the *1st* state where Trump actually gets more than 50% of the vote..
Also, people forget that the Democrat and Republican Parties are private organizations. As
a Republican National Committee member Curly Haugland correctly stated:
‘Political parties choose their nominee, not the general public.”
The problem is not the way the parties elect their candidates (insider politicing and superdelegates notwithstanding), it is the fact they we basically have a two-party system. The internal problems of these Parties are good for the country in the long term as they weaken the Parties and people’s faith in them. Every year that the number of registered Republicans and Democrats decreases is a good year – let the good times roll.