iBankCoin
Joined Nov 11, 2007
31,929 Blog Posts

Why Martin Luther King Was Republican

by Frances Rice

08/16/2006

It should come as no surprise that Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. was a Republican. In that era, almost all black Americans were Republicans. Why? From its founding in 1854 as the anti-slavery party until today, the Republican Party has championed freedom and civil rights for blacks. And as one pundit so succinctly stated, the Democrat Party is as it always has been, the party of the four S’s: slavery, secession, segregation and now socialism.

It was the Democrats who fought to keep blacks in slavery and passed the discriminatory Black Codes and Jim Crow laws. The Democrats started the Ku Klux Klan to lynch and terrorize blacks. The Democrats fought to prevent the passage of every civil rights law beginning with the civil rights laws of the 1860s, and continuing with the civil rights laws of the 1950s and 1960s.

During the civil rights era of the 1960s, Dr. King was fighting the Democrats who stood in the school house doors, turned skin-burning fire hoses on blacks and let loose vicious dogs. It was Republican President Dwight Eisenhower who pushed to pass the Civil Rights Act of 1957 and sent troops to Arkansas to desegregate schools. President Eisenhower also appointed Chief Justice Earl Warren to the U.S. Supreme Court, which resulted in the 1954 Brown v. Board of Education decision ending school segregation. Much is made of Democrat President Harry Truman’s issuing an Executive Order in 1948 to desegregate the military. Not mentioned is the fact that it was Eisenhower who actually took action to effectively end segregation in the military.

Democrat President John F. Kennedy is lauded as a proponent of civil rights. However, Kennedy voted against the 1957 Civil Rights Act while he was a senator, as did Democrat Sen. Al Gore Sr. And after he became President, Kennedy was opposed to the 1963 March on Washington by Dr. King that was organized by A. Phillip Randolph, who was a black Republican. President Kennedy, through his brother Atty. Gen. Robert Kennedy, had Dr. King wiretapped and investigated by the FBI on suspicion of being a Communist in order to undermine Dr. King.

In March of 1968, while referring to Dr. King’s leaving Memphis, Tenn., after riots broke out where a teenager was killed, Democrat Sen. Robert Byrd (W.Va.), a former member of the Ku Klux Klan, called Dr. King a “trouble-maker” who starts trouble, but runs like a coward after trouble is ignited. A few weeks later, Dr. King returned to Memphis and was assassinated on April 4, 1968.

Given the circumstances of that era, it is understandable why Dr. King was a Republican. It was the Republicans who fought to free blacks from slavery and amended the Constitution to grant blacks freedom (13th Amendment), citizenship (14th Amendment) and the right to vote (15th Amendment). Republicans passed the civil rights laws of the 1860s, including the Civil Rights Act of 1866 and the Reconstruction Act of 1867 that was designed to establish a new government system in the Democrat-controlled South, one that was fair to blacks. Republicans also started the NAACP and affirmative action with Republican President Richard Nixon’s 1969 Philadelphia Plan (crafted by black Republican Art Fletcher) that set the nation’s fist goals and timetables. Although affirmative action now has been turned by the Democrats into an unfair quota system, affirmative action was begun by Nixon to counter the harm caused to blacks when Democrat President Woodrow Wilson in 1912 kicked all of the blacks out of federal government jobs.

Few black Americans know that it was Republicans who founded the Historically Black Colleges and Universities. Unknown also is the fact that Republican Sen. Everett Dirksen from Illinois was key to the passage of civil rights legislation in 1957, 1960, 1964 and 1965. Not mentioned in recent media stories about extension of the 1965 Voting Rights Act is the fact that Dirksen wrote the language for the bill. Dirksen also crafted the language for the Civil Rights Act of 1968 which prohibited discrimination in housing. President Lyndon Johnson could not have achieved passage of civil rights legislation without the support of Republicans.

Critics of Republican Sen. Barry Goldwater, who ran for President against Johnson in 1964, ignore the fact that Goldwater wanted to force the Democrats in the South to stop passing discriminatory laws and thus end the need to continuously enact federal civil rights legislation.

Those who wrongly criticize Goldwater also ignore the fact that Johnson, in his 4,500 State of the Union Address delivered on Jan. 4, 1965, mentioned scores of topics for federal action, but only 35 words were devoted to civil rights. He did not mention one word about voting rights. Then in 1967, showing his anger with Dr. King’s protest against the Vietnam War, Johnson referred to Dr. King as “that Nigger preacher.”

Contrary to the false assertions by Democrats, the racist “Dixiecrats” did not all migrate to the Republican Party. “Dixiecrats” declared that they would rather vote for a “yellow dog” than vote for a Republican because the Republican Party was know as the party for blacks. Today, some of those “Dixiecrats” continue their political careers as Democrats, including Robert Byrd, who is well known for having been a “Keagle” in the Ku Klux Klan.

Another former “Dixiecrat” is former Democrat Sen. Ernest Hollings, who put up the Confederate flag over the state Capitol when he was the governor of South Carolina. There was no public outcry when Democrat Sen. Christopher Dodd praised Byrd as someone who would have been “a great senator for any moment,” including the Civil War. Yet Democrats denounced then-Senate GOP leader Trent Lott for his remarks about Sen. Strom Thurmond (R.-S.C.). Thurmond was never in the Ku Klux Klan and defended blacks against lynching and the discriminatory poll taxes imposed on blacks by Democrats. If Byrd and Thurmond were alive during the Civil War, and Byrd had his way, Thurmond would have been lynched.

The 30-year odyssey of the South switching to the Republican Party began in the 1970s with President Richard Nixon’s “Southern Strategy,” which was an effort on the part of Nixon to get Christians in the South to stop voting for Democrats who did not share their values and were still discriminating against their fellow Christians who happened to be black. Georgia did not switch until 2002, and some Southern states, including Louisiana, are still controlled by Democrats.

Today, Democrats, in pursuit of their socialist agenda, are fighting to keep blacks poor, angry and voting for Democrats. Examples of how egregiously Democrats act to keep blacks in poverty are numerous.

After wrongly convincing black Americans that a minimum wage increase was a good thing, the Democrats on August 3 kept their promise and killed the minimum wage bill passed by House Republicans on July 29. The blockage of the minimum wage bill was the second time in as many years that Democrats stuck a legislative finger in the eye of black Americans. Senate Democrats on April 1, 2004, blocked passage of a bill to renew the 1996 welfare reform law that was pushed by Republicans and vetoed twice by President Clinton before he finally signed it. Since the welfare reform law expired in September 2002, Congress had passed six extensions, and the latest expired on June 30, 2004. Opposed by the Democrats are school choice opportunity scholarships that would help black children get out of failing schools and Social Security reform, even though blacks on average lose $10,000 in the current system because of a shorter life expectancy than whites (72.2 years for blacks vs. 77.5 years for whites).

Democrats have been running our inner-cities for the past 30 to 40 years, and blacks are still complaining about the same problems. More than $7 trillion dollars have been spent on poverty programs since Lyndon Johnson’s War on Poverty with little, if any, impact on poverty. Diabolically, every election cycle, Democrats blame Republicans for the deplorable conditions in the inner-cities, then incite blacks to cast a protest vote against Republicans.

In order to break the Democrats’ stranglehold on the black vote and free black Americans from the Democrat Party’s economic plantation, we must shed the light of truth on the Democrats. We must demonstrate that the Democrat Party policies of socialism and dependency on government handouts offer the pathway to poverty, while Republican Party principles of hard work, personal responsibility, getting a good education and ownership of homes and small businesses offer the pathway to prosperity.

If you enjoy the content at iBankCoin, please follow us on Twitter

10 comments

  1. Blind Read Ant

    Wow. That was astonishing and informative. Thanks WS!

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  2. drummerboy

    i have been saying it for years,”i dont know how any black american person that can vote in this country, ever be a democrat,it is fucking mind boggling to me.

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  3. Pete

    The republican party trips over itself all the time when it comes to the race issue. It isnt that mind boggling at all.

    I’ll give you some examples to refresh your memory.

    1. President Obama, our first black president is accused of not being a citizen of America, and is from Kenya.
    2. Republicans have a problem with minorities. Individual republicans dont, but the party itself isnt freindly to minorities. 1 Example: Calling illegal immigrant children criminals. Of course republicans dont see this as a problem, but, huge but, minorities have a big problem with that.
    3. Republicans arent politically correct. They will say things offensive to people and think its ok. Even though to the majority of that minority it isnt true, but still its offensive to that minority being offended.

    You know the old saying. Republicans arent racist, but most racist tend to vote republican.

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
    • Woodshedder

      Pete, in the face of all the evidence presented in the article above, I’m surprised you would attempt to present a rebuttal with such weak arguments. Political correctness? Really?

      Before you attempt (with weak evidence at best) to label Republican’s racist, please explain how the Democrat party was not built on a foundation of racism.

      It seems to me that your argument MUST be, a. Democrats are racists, b. Republicans might be because they are not politically correct.

      Correct me if I’m wrong.

      • 0
      • 0
      • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
      • Pete

        That is the past. Times change. Where the republican party stands today has changed from that of 40 years ago. Ronald Reagan would not recognize the party that idealizes him today, infact I dont think he would be able to get the nomination today, if he was to run.

        I often do envy the politics of back then. More initiatives were successful. America could build shit back then. We could lay down roads like China is laying down HSR.

        Back to your point. I do not deny what your saying is incorrect. Infact if I was to factcheck, I am sure a good amount of what your saying would be correct, but those initiatives are the actions of individual republicans that took the moral highground. The party itself fought the initiatives. Im pretty sure the party members itself wasnt happy one bit when Pres. Johnson desegregated schools. The party was probably very split on the idea. Rascism was popular back then and the KKK had a powerful political grip on said party. Johnson went against his own party to accomplish desegregation of schools. Going against your own party today, would be suicide.

        I dont give any party credit for accomplishing what needed to be done in the past. It often times took an individual to stand up for what was right. When somebody sees an injustice happening to someone, forget where they stand politically, there morals are what guides them.

        Today, in both parties, politicians like balls and backbones. Republicans cannot be true leaders because they must pander to the hard right, Liberals cannot be leaders because they also lack balls and a backbone to stand up to the republicans.

        • 0
        • 0
        • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
        • fake amish

          wtf? meaningless nonsense. sorry peter pan you fail.

          • 0
          • 0
          • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
          • Pete

            Thats fine. I just hope republicans try to stop rewriting history to make themselves look like they were behind most initiatives in the past. Republicans have usually been behind the times when it comes to progress. They are traditionalist, not progressives.

            That is true for the majority of the individual republican.

            • 0
            • 0
            • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
          • Mr. Cain Thaler

            Pete, that statement is unsubstantiated. Don’t suppose, go look up the voting records. Then get back with us. The fact is, a majority of votes had to come from somewhere.

            • 0
            • 0
            • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
        • Woodshedder

          Pete, you are ignoring the foundations of the Democratic party, but that is okay. We can continue anyway.

          I agree, not all Republicans were for desegration and civil rights. There were Republicans that voted against both.

          I think the key point is that you still see the battle as this: Republicans against the hard right and Democrats against Republicans. That is a very very important distinction, which you have clearly made. In fact, what you are saying is that there is nothing about the Democratic platform that needs improvement. You are saying that the Democratic platform is beyond reproach. You see the battle as the need to change the Republican platform.

          Surely you will admit that the battle is within each party, that neither party is perfect.

          If not, you are de facto approving the Democratic party’s foundation of anti-civil rights, anti African-American, and approval of the KKK. This is true because you state the Republican party has changed, but you never say the Democratic party has changed…

          • 0
          • 0
          • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"