iBankCoin
Stock advice in actual English.
Joined Sep 2, 2009
1,224 Blog Posts

One year later, where are the higher healthcare costs?

One year into the life of the healthcare overhaul bill passed by President Obama and the Democrats in Congress, and really I think you would be hard pressed to find too many people screaming for the bill to be stricken down (other than Tea Party members, of course).

The reality of the thing is that, while Republicans have frequently called for skyrocketing healthcare costs and denial of services, it would be disingenuous to say that these things have yet to materialize.

That’s not to say the bill is broadly popular, by any means. Just that it is not experiencing any sort of backlash, visible to the common beholder. A recent Gallop poll shows 46% of Americans in support of the measure, while 40% are opposed to it. Juan Williams for Fox News wrote about the subject today, calling the situation “sunny.”

Kirsten Powers, on the same news site, came out calling for a public acceptance of the bill for all of its qualities (and shifting blame for its vices on the age old causes of skyrocketing healthcare costs; remind me, what was this bill supposed to be doing again?).

However, beneath the surface is a torrent of activity which, if revealed, would likely surprise the average citizen.

The best way to see this activity is through the eyes of one of the benefits consultants currently involved with the companies that are dealing with the new costs and regulation. For instance, Towers Watson has been aggressively interpreting information as it has materialized, putting much of that on the front of their website. I know of a few other consultant groups who are providing similar fast paced advisement services.

Healthcare overhaul is going to be the big thing this year; and that’s saying a lot, as it wasn’t exactly a small thing last year.

Going into last year, only 14% of respondents in a Towers Watson survey said they thought the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act would help keep costs down, although 96% said that was a high priority to them.

Only 20% thought that the reforms would improve quality of care.

These numbers are quite significant, as they represent the general mood of business towards the act. Keep in mind, health costs are a large portion of any responsible corporations budget; business owners have been very tepid about spending money and budgeting over the last year.

Still, despite the concern of HR departments and management the country over, it appears as though their worries were blown out of proportion, doesn’t it?

Unfortunately, no.

You see, last year, carriers (most notably the big ones, like Blue Cross Blue Shield) went and did exactly what you would expect from savvy corporations.

Facing uncertainty and understanding that most provisions would not be fully understood for some time thereafter, they knew that reacting at the moment was pointless. And they also understood that if they rushed to raise rates when everyone was looking at the issue they would be painted as opportunistic, greedy, bloodsucking monsters. So many of these carriers moved to conform to the new law immediately, despite being grandfathered in for a couple years more.

And they ate the costs.

However, those happy days are done. These companies have been taking losses, giving out services for less than free. They did so for the purpose of expediency. However, the changes are coming.

And the unfortunate reality is that, this year, employers who were already scrambling from needing to implement the legislation themselves are about to get hit hard; a cost increase likely double to what they’re used to. One part of that increase is for going forward. One part is retroactive pricing for the free six months – one year that the carriers were giving out.

That’s if they’re lucky. Plenty are getting nailed to the tune of 20% cost increases or greater.

If you’re in an HR group, you probably already know this. But if you’re an employee, let me give you an intro to some new terminology you’ll be getting to know intricately very soon.

• Copay – this will bring new meaning to the word. The only thing that can’t be touched under Obamacare is preventative services. But that leaves a lot that can be touched.

• Deductibles – I bet every plan in the next five years will have a deductible; carriers will not be offering any plan that doesn’t have one. No more effortless services; they want you to share the pain, so you think twice about whether you need that pain medication (did you catch the irony?).

• Consumer Driven Health Plans – this one is probably new to most of you. Just understand, it functions as a series of accounts where your cost depends on your usage; much like everything else in life. You will be required to put away money into a tax free account that pays no interest and gets wiped clean every year. It will be an immense headache to most of you, and you will hate these plans very much.

• Generic Drugs – Rx costs are the number one growing segment in healthcare, already accounting for something like one third of gross expenses. Guess what? Purchases of brand name drugs will be paid for in blood, for you certainly will not be paying for them in dollars. Preferred brand names will cost as much as 8x more than generics. Non-preferred will…well, just don’t ask.

• Spousal De-coverage – guess whose significant other won’t be getting under your plan if they have coverage elsewhere? Did you guess, “mine?”

• Benefit Cuts – Even if it looks like nothing has changed…it probably has. Small tweaks, like in the definition of what constitutes “necessary” or an “accident” will probably floor you the first time you get stuck with a $700 bill after an unapproved visit to the ER.

• Per Member Costs – Up until now, a group of three or more has been billed as a family, regardless of whether that meant a man, a woman, and a child, or a man and his six illegitimate offspring. Now, many plans will start forcing you to pay for your children’s coverage, since they will be responsible for your offspring for much longer. Just remember, just because coverage can’t be denied, doesn’t mean coverage is free.

You see, friends, nothing is free. There are always trade offs – yours just got delayed a bit. Renewal dates for health plans will come as a nasty surprise for many of you, as you get socked with deep cuts to things you took for granted. These cuts will most likely be the equivalent of a 10-12% decrease in the cost of your health plan to your company. To you, that would likely translate to an increase of somewhere between 80-200% in fees from what you are paying now. Whether you actually pay that much more, or just have value secretly denied you, remains up to your employer. However, the necessity to trim does not.

Folks like Mr. Williams and Mrs. Powers have been asking, “where is all the suffering that everyone was screaming about?” The answer is:

It’s coming.

If you enjoy the content at iBankCoin, please follow us on Twitter

22 comments

  1. MX2101

    Excellent piece, Mr Thaler.

    In my life I notice a significant spread between the “rack rate” of procedures and services and the negotiated price paid by insurance. I figure the “correct” price is somewhere in between. I agree that medical care is valuable and providers should not be valued cheaply, but I wonder where pricing will settle when consumers pay more of the bill.

    Recently I had an outpatient procedure. It is not easy to shop prices for medical services, the insurance company could only provide rough guidelines, and the medical provider’s office staff was somewhat put off when I asked for the price in advance. People just don’t do that, but soon I think they will.

    Certainly society can reasonably expect insurance to cover major health events, accidents and black swan things. But perhaps an individual should consider that their lifestyle choices could mean selling their house to cover the cost of living longer. Right now, I think the public still has the expectation that insurance will cover everything, which is moral hazard that will only increase the ask price of health care.

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  2. The Fly

    excellent

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  3. NHS

    Thank god for the English NHS!

    If I was American and ill, with little money to my name, I’d be extremely worried.

    You Yanks may criticise the NHS but its worth its weight in gold for the less fortunate members of society.

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
    • Mr. Cain Thaler

      As you aren’t an American, I think it’s safe to say you don’t know what you’d feel.

      Our system wasn’t that terrible; healthcare costs were exploding because of massive expansion to the kinds of services you could get, not because of extreme scarcity, per se. Mostly, we just need to start mass producing/ industrializing some of the new processes to start bringing the cost down.

      Your bullshit model doesn’t fix any of that. Neither does our new one, judging by how costs are still exploding higher.

      • 0
      • 0
      • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  4. Raul

    Consumer Driven Health Plans: Will they replace my beloved HSA? Or are they something different entirely?

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
    • Mr. Cain Thaler

      An HSA is one of the accounts I was speaking of. CDHP’s as a collection are the accounts and rules that govern the rest of your benefits.

      • 0
      • 0
      • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  5. drummerboy

    thats what it was first dressed as.something for the less fortunate,until all business’ figured out that they were going to pay for it all. when all it is beginning to look like is the government holding a dagger to everyones throat, and with a shit eating grin,telling us sorry,but now we have to reach into the other pocket now to force it upon you. insurance………..what a scam

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  6. NHS

    Thanks Cane but I like to think I DO know how I’d feel – in fact I’m quite certain I’d prefer our NHS to your ‘bullshit’ system.

    One of the main reasons being that its not pitting one American against the other – them against us – the uninsured against the insured – the losers against the ‘winners’. The NHS system cares for all regardless of status.

    It might have area’s where it doesn’t work quite so well as a private/insured system but its a damn sight more caring. Perhaps you need to explore it more?

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
    • Mr. Cain Thaler

      I couldn’t care less about caring. Lots of people “care.” Considerably less people “help.”

      But hey, keep your system. No sweat off my nose. Our poor can always go join you…

      • 0
      • 0
      • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  7. Woodshedder

    Estimates are that there are approximately ONLY 17 million Americans who don’t have access and can’t afford healthcare insurance. We’d be better off designing a plan to provide access to those 17 million who truly need it rather than designing a terrible plan for 313 million who don’t need it.

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
    • Mr. Cain Thaler

      (laughter) that’s 17 million before you subtract healthy twenty year olds who don’t want to pay and the super rich who know better than to piss money away on insurance when they can cover the cost of all procedures out of pocket.

      How many are left afterwards that fit the sob story of some poor, destitute hobo who eats week old egg salad sandwiches; that pitiful image which we constantly have forced down our throats.

      • 0
      • 0
      • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
      • Raul

        Pretty much; my insurance before an HSA was drink plenty of water, don’t do back flips when snowboarding, and steer clear of party drugs.

        • 0
        • 0
        • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
      • Woodshedder

        Actually, that 17 million reflects the rich who can afford it and don’t want it as well as the healthy 20 years olds. Really, only about 5% of America can’t afford health insurance and have no access through various already existing gov’t programs.

        • 0
        • 0
        • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  8. NHS

    How do you know the 313 million DON’T need it? How do you know?

    Anecdotal evidence suggests a significant percentage of them are living in fear of some unforeseen medical condition and the ensuing problems with bills and insurance companies! They are living on the financial edge because of the greed of your insurance based system.

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
    • Mr. Cain Thaler

      Who are these people? Where are these people? What are their names. As anecdotal evidence suggests, you’ve provided a story, nothing more.

      Meanwhile, as someone who’s dealt with insurance companies regularly, I’d say you’re oversimplifying the situation by saying their greed is what’s driving others to the edge. Most people would be significantly worse off without their insurance company.

      The insurance companies are trying to solve a problem. They are predominantly good citizens working hard; but they’re not fucking miracle workers.

      • 0
      • 0
      • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  9. NHS

    Lol. Spoken like a true American, Cane T.

    Stand on the heads of your fellow countrymen in the scramble to be first / the best / top dog.

    I ‘love’ that viciously competitive aggression and remorseless strive to ‘get to the top’ that yourself and some of your compatriots employ – it becomes you.

    Unlike yourself, if I were American it would concern me that there were millions of my fellow countrymen who perhaps through no fault of their own can’t afford a medical procedure or drugs that might make their lives easier.

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
    • Mr. Cain Thaler

      Who’s standing on whom? I leave my countrymen well enough alone.

      How did you put it? “– them against us – the uninsured against the insured – the losers against the ‘winners’.”

      You’d be surprised that I rarely think in those terms. You’re the one obsessed with class warfare, not I.

      Up until now that is. Now I am finding myself in the peculiar position of being considerably better off if very large segments of our population did not exist. SS, Medicare, Medicaid, and now another monstrosity of an entitlement program. Plus the rest of my taxes, that do God knows what.

      I hope you don’t really believe that your ideals are making the world a better, safer place. Before, the poor in our country were blessed with my indifference; even pity and aid, at times. Now, they’re going to start receiving my contempt.

      • 0
      • 0
      • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
      • NHS

        Sorry $Cane$, no class obsessions here. Just a desire to see a bit of fairness around the world.

        In actual face, the meaning of the sentence was to highlight the American drive for competitiveness for the sake of it – which from an objective point of view is taken to such extremes (in the U.S.) that it appears to ‘blind’ people to the suffering and stress it can cause.

        Oh, and ideals can and do make the world a better place – check your history books.

        Goodnight $Cane$, don’t forget to check your bank balance before you sleep.

        • 0
        • 0
        • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
        • NHS

          of course, the sentence should read…

          “In actual fact, the meaning … ”

          but it doesn’t seem possible to edit posts on here.

          • 0
          • 0
          • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
        • Mr. Cain Thaler

          Actually, before I sleep, I think I’ll say goodnight to my loved ones. I check my balance in the morning with my first cup of coffee.

          Enjoy your sleep. I’m going to enjoy watching you lose those benefits when your country gets its credit rating slashed.

          • 0
          • 0
          • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  10. Woodshedder

    This is for NHS

    “Of the “almost 50 million Americans,” really 46.5 million from the 2009 Census analysis, more than a quarter of them were foreign-born residents (12.3 million), with only 2.8 million of those naturalized citizens. More than a third, 17.8 million, had household incomes at or above the national average of $50,000 and could afford to buy insurance on their own. Throw in the Medicaid/CHIP underreporting, and the number comes closer to 17 million uninsured without choice.”

    http://hotair.com/archives/2011/03/22/starbucks-ceo-on-second-thought-obamacare-doesnt-look-so-good/

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  11. NHS

    Thanks Wood. Isn’t 17 million people being unable to afford healthcare a bad enough situation anyway?

    Back to you…

    http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2010-09-17-uninsured17_ST_N.htm

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"