– What about the maid?
– The maid?
– Was he jealous of her, too? He strangled her.
– It’s possible that his intended victim was a man and he made a mistake.
– A mistake? In a nudist camp?
– Nobody’s perfect.
The above quote, while funny, really has nothing to do with this post. But, it does use of the word ‘strangle’, which is a topic of discussion, and contains a valid reason for using it: ‘nobody’s perfect’…so here are a couple strategies that have built-in protection for those not-so-perfect days. So unless you are able to perfectly predict market/stock direction (in which case, why aren’t you on CNBC? /note sarcasm), read on.
I wrote about the short straddle not too long ago…flip that upside down for a long straddle; and the long strangle is very similar to that strategy. Both rely on large price swings and increasing volatility of the underlying stock. Profits are gained from a big move, up or down.
They both consist of buying a call & a put of the same expiration. However, while a straddle also uses the same strike price, a strangle involves a higher strike for the call and a lower one for the put. As a result, a strangle has greater leverage and lower cost, but at the price of increased risk.
While both strategies have a predefined cost (the total of the premiums + fees), a straddle is only worthless when the underlying equals the strike price. The strangle is worthless when the stock’s price is between the call and the put price:
The breakeven points for both include the cost of commisions/fees.
Personally, I prefer long straddles… I like the lower inherent risk and the quicker profits. However, strangles are just as useful, and they come at a lower cost & greater leverage.
I have also found strangles to work better on cheaper stocks, or when the underlying stock’s price is in-between strike prices. This is the reason I went with a strangle on [[CSUN]] ahead of their earnings.
There is of course no reason you can’t buy a straddle on a stock that’s not near a strike price (or vice-a-versa)…but with a strangle, you don’t have to decide whether to buy it above or below the stock’s price. So if the time is right and the stock is not near a strike price, I will generally go with a strangle (yes, I’m simple like that).
The key for either of the two strategies is to pick a stock that will move. Low volatility stocks need not apply. China & the solars generally provide good targets, especially just ahead of earnings.
UPDATE: An excellent straddle opportunity from RC, in [[SEED]] today – earnings after market close. Currently trading right around $5.
UPDATE of the UPDATE: SEED is ripping, up 30%! Will consider selling part of the position at the close to protect profits.
UPDATE II: More from RC. Check out the open interest in [[FINL]] May 2.50 & 5.00 Calls compared to other months! Care to speculate on a buyout?
Comments »