Although my 40% cash position may create the illusion that I am missing out, such a view would be misplaced. Careful allocation and selection on my part is gifting me full participation in today’s excess in spite of recent reservation.

BAS is up 7.29% at the time of this writing, as the natural gas cycle makes full leaps and bounds forward. As I told you it would transpire, this is where your money must be at for the next 10 years. Companies and partnerships like BAS and HCLP will grow at unprecedented rates, facilitating the United States of America back to Her rightful status as Greatest Country and Loan Superpower on planet Earth.

HCLP is also up 2% and taken altogether, my portfolio is up .9%.

As for the excitement about Yellen, I don’t fully understand the sentiment. If you go back and read or listen to anything from Yellen, it’s pretty clear she has been consistently more in favor of Federal Reserve supporting markets and the economy than Bernanke was.

Despite that, there is good reason to believe a deep pullback may come soon enough (first half of 2014). We can’t all be millionaires.

UPDATE If you followed my initial purchase of BAS on 8/16/2012, you are presently up 65% on the position. If you’ve been trading along with me inside The PPT, you are up far more.

Comments »

I used to own TLP, and so I’m aware that this and similar businesses could be ground zero for any pipeline brought into operation. TLP runs a rail channeling business which primarily deals in chemicals and petroleum, and in the past I found a nice supply of internal documents from this partnership warning of the impact of an oil pipeline competing with them.

It’s incredible, but Morgan Stanley, who was one of the originators of the partnership and chief stakeholders, literally just closed a sale of their entire position to Russia’s Rosneft on December 20.

What immensely convenient timing, that they exited a position that could experience ranging disruption from the construction of a new pipeline just one month before a study is released that all but seals its construction…

Anyway, I’d keep an eye on TLP and not be surprised if it suddenly take a hit to PE multiples, as the realization dawns that their main terminal is about to be outbid.

If the partnership was still intact, I would possibly consider buying it after it corrects, because lateral movement of goods will still be necessary and TLP is in good position to hold that business. But honestly I personally don’t want to have close dealings with the Russians.

Comments »

I usually am a little skeptical about the usefulness of guidance. Executive guidance can be some of the worst – people who are intimately wrapped up in a business tend to have a hard time knowing when to say “yeah, this ship is going down.” In fact, business school strictly forbids it.

But the most recent guidance from BAS, for whatever it’s worth, beat expectations. December was supposed to be a heinous month. Instead, it was merely a horrid month. Take that with a grain of salt.

Well rig service hours were unchanged, at about 61%. My long term thesis involves that number catapulting back to 80%+ eventually, which is why I own the name.

Fluid service truck count is up to 1,003 units. Fluid service truck hours are up 8% this year.

The company saw surprise strength in December (which is really just less flaccid weakness, pretending). Instead of the forecasted 7-8% drop in revenues that were expected, they anticipate they only saw a 6-7% drop.

This is all good and well and hearsay. What caught my eye was that they are also reporting their customers are reporting increases in 2014 spending. Now that’s useful to me.

The natural gas/well servicing industry was more or less crushed in 2011 thanks to generally bad dealings by one Aubrey McClendon. That and a half dozen other idiotic moves saddled CHK investors with 60% equity losses, taking the company to par with the lows set in 2009 (which is saying something).

This left most small well servicing firms in quite a predicament. You see, as a group they were pretty much a “no cash on hand” industry. There were only a few, like BAS, that had adequate financing to weather the storm.

A sea of mergers and acquisitions later (not to mention a few major bankruptcies; looking your way PSN.TO) and we may be ready to get back to fair weather. The natural gas spot price has largely recovered. And now BAS is reporting that client spending is looking up.

Comments »

The fed decision to test the waters with a taper while I was away did surprise me, somewhat. Yet it did not phase me much and so I elected to remain on vacation, silent on the issue.

I would state now in hindsight that a $5B per month taper (with as much as another $5-10B in the works) would still put the Federal Reserve on path to add another ~$800B to its balance sheet in 2014. This remains colossal and would have the Fed assets outstanding at just under $5 Trillion by 2015.

They may very well have tapered by $5B/month just because they were running out of things to buy…(laughter)

If I were to state things that concern me as potential impediments to the US economy and growth, they would list (1) consumer slowdown from budget impacts (pension, healthcare costs, rents/mortgage, increased retirement contributions, etc), (2) foreign existential shocks (EU breakup, Asian crisis, similar collapse that disrupts foreign trade) – where exactly did the EU government debt go and why is it now suddenly not an issue? Who is buying it (ECB, Fed, banking scheme, inter-government trade imbalances, etc)? And what stops non-payment concerns from popping up again in the future? and (3) the election of a Republican majority

But banking solvency just isn’t on that list right now. Neither is inflation, really, although long term prospects of an uncontrollable outbreak of inflation remains a viable possibility. With credit expansion in this country limited to growth of government balance sheets, deflationary pressure is set to commence…until it doesn’t. In the meantime, another ~$1 Trillion of free money to those closest to the trough will keep a major disruption of financial assets here at home as a low probability outcome. Of course, this bodes ill for the “wealth equality” lot, but they’re too dumb to call the system out on that, so we maintain the course.

Concerns aside, I am optimistic. Recessions don’t last forever, and my concerns are outweighed by hope in outlook. I am very long (no margin) and prepared to reap the rewards of economic growth. It’s been almost six years; the system has been on a hyperactive outlook for problems which greatly reduces the likelihood that a real “Black Swan” manages to crop up. It could still happen of course, but with hundreds of thousands of financial professionals calling bubbles as quickly as problems crop up, and a full time central banking staff armed with an unlimited supply of money attacking them at first sight, how exactly is a crisis supposed to materialize from all of this?

The only room for crisis in the US is rampant commodity/asset appreciation, which remains benign. That or an elsewise major shock to the consumer. Financial assets and liquidity issues are covered.

Now, that being said, historically we haven’t had a period longer than 10 years without a recession since at least 1789 (and probably not since long before that either – I just lack records to verify a more robust claim). I’d say the expectation of a correction since the Great Depression is 5-10 years with occasional 1-3 year shocks intermittently. We’re past the small shocks phase, which would put the expectation at right about where we’re at.

These times are unprecedented and the support the Fed is willing to lend the markets (unlike any time in recorded history) makes me think we blow through the averages. I want to say this ship will have the wind to sail to years seven, eight or nine, uninterrupted. We may even match the record holder of 10 or above.

However, it would be foolhardy to doubt another recession will most likely crop up before 2020. The ever growing levels of margin debt to buy equities may well be the first sign of the beginning of the final run before that. Of course it could be nothing.

My belief then is that a long commitment remains the way to go. I have been positively surprised by recent developments that have overridden prior comments on wanting to have a larger cash position by about this time (end of 2013) that I made late last year. However, as gains are taken, a portion should begun to be set aside, starting sometime mid 2014 to early 2015. This should create a reserve build-up of steadily marching intervals (10-20%, with a 1-2% increase every month topping out at around 40-50% of ones account value) sometime around late 2015 to early 2016.

At such time, a second hard look should be had. Earlier and exceptional strength should trigger a reassessment of these statements. Casual to quality growth does not necessarily change them. A major weakness (such as a shock of a GOP majority and fear of monetary policy interference) of course may necessitate a sudden course change.

My most hated places to invest are land/real estate (excluding multifamily or renting derived), oil companies (excluding natural gas predominated), and retail (excluding facilitation to the ultra-rich).

My favorite places center around natural gas production expansion, uranium, coal, multifamily REITs, and I remain interested in holding physical precious metals in a full position in the event an inflation shock from significant expansion in credit hits the economy.

I’m indifferent to the insurance market – especially health insurance. It could swing either way; they crawled into bed with the devil so it’s all political at this point. On the one hand, the entire market is shifting in wild and unpredictable ways. On the other, the feds are rigging the game in the insurance companies favor. Just stay away.

Comments »

Long ago, when I first purchased CCJ, in the midst of a nuclear reactor melting down on a coastline in the Pacific, I told you that there was more to this than the panic being cultivated by professional fire-alarm pullers.

And there were two primary reasons at that time which I gave. The first, and most obvious, of course, was that one does not just restructure the load production of a country’s power grid over night. Watching Japan struggle with prices as they import the coal needed to replace that energy has been an exercise in this concept.

Across the planet, other nations that declared their intentions to wean off nuclear energy are also realizing how difficult this task will actually be.

But the other main reason I gave why Japan, specifically, would not be divesting itself of nuclear assets was not economical. It was military.

Japan’s hardship is that it is an island nation with weak natural resources. And Her ancestral rival is a massive half a continent, sporting more than one billion people and rich natural resources just a short ship ride away.

In a peace time environment, Japan may have taken her sweet time (and much wasted money and hardship) restarting the nuclear energy program. The Japanese are a notoriously conservative culture, and if you have ever worked with a Japanese company, you know just what I mean by that.

But even Japan, with her slow, careful processions, has limits of patience.

Japan’s greatest threat is a blockade of supply routes. A steady flow of resources into the country is necessary to maintain it. These supply routes, not unlike the UK’s in World War 2, would prove a great headache and cause of domestic problems in a military conflict.

It’s bad enough importing food, goods, raw materials, munitions, etcetera. And having your nations power grid at the mercy of getting boats past enemy naval fleets is just one extra pitfall that Japanese military leadership will not want to deal with.

This was one of the main reasons Japan decided on the nuclear path years ago to begin with. A nuclear reactor carries enough fuel both active and in storage to supply full power for around 3 years.

Compare that to a coal plant, which under full load can require a delivery of about 15,000 tons of fuel a day. This approach requires a constant flow of fuel and also very large holding sites, both of which become attractive and hard to defend targets in wartime.

I bring this up because just recently, Japan’s leadership has reaffirmed the country’s commitment to safe nuclear power. A recent report from Cameco management issued guidance of a sizable fraction of Japan’s total nuclear assets beginning to come back online. This same report detailed that Cameco has observed Japan to be net buyers of nuclear fuel at this point in time.

This should be seen as reducing the uncertainty surrounding Japan’s fuel assets. One of the many worries supplying downward pressure on nuclear spot price has been that Japanese utilities may begin selling off unused fuel. This does not seem to be the case.

In the same presentation, Cameco also reassured audience members that Cameco will not be entering into any long term fuel contracts at these prices, which Cameco considers unreasonable. They are waiting for the market to set rates higher, and have instead dedicated themselves to shoring up the balance sheet and controlling costs to bide the time.

For the moment, the uranium market remains cold. But Cameco is committed to outlasting the cold spell. I remain very excited in the prospects of CCJ, and it remains my largest position at this time.

Comments »

If you missed it, the Wall Street Journal came out today with a centerpiece on fracking sand. This is great exposure to the space.

If you’ve been paying attention, I took a position in the partnership HCLP this summer for $24-26, with some adds and trading around the position since then. They sell exactly this sand to well services companies.

A few recent big developments with HCLP include a settlement with Baker Hughes and inclusive six year supply agreement that helped send it to the $32 price it’s at today. Other developments include an almost million share issuance from a parent/sibling company (non-dilutive).

The share price has come under downward pressure (from the million share issuance); however, this exposure is exactly what’s needed to get more money flowing into the position. The partnership is expensive and small, but I love the positioning and think it’s in exactly the right place for major growth over the next decade.

Another position similar to HCLP (and Chuck Bennett honorable mention) is SLCA. They specialize in a similar alternative to the fracking sand HCLP offers.

Comments »