iBankCoin
Joined Jan 1, 1970
1,010 Blog Posts

Fundamentals for Dumb-Me – Part 3: The Good and The Ugly

It’s not The Good, The Bad and The Ugly.

Let’s face it, when you are trading stocks, there is no in between. There is only The Good and The Ugly and nobody likes ugly. So how can  you keep from being some dope sitting at a bar after four tequilas unable to tell if that chick or dude (or stock) is ugly?

In the previous post, I laid out for you some ideas that can help you determine if a company is profitable and being well managed. Previous to that, I gave you instructions to help you find a reasonable value for a company so that you can have an idea of where the stock price could go and thus determine if the stock is a good buy. But there is no point in doing all that work on a company that is being run into the ground by its management because that is just plain ugly!

Before we continue, let me say once again, that while what I am presenting here is certainly true and a good argument for fundamentals, many stocks don’t give a damn what they are worth. After all, I have certainly made a case for the idea that all this fundamental noise never made me a better trader, but charting has.

Since I have shared with you a few of my tricks for simple valuation and looking up data for free on the Internets, let’s take a look at how those fundamentals actually move a stock. I present for you two companies for comparison. $AMSC and $EMKR. These companies tracked one another rather closely early on .

Take a look at this chart from 1998 to 2007. I have plotted with simple lines here so that you can easily see the comparison. Notice how closely they tracked each other during this time frame. They were pretty well matched.

The following chart compares the two companies from 2001 to present day. Note the divergence since 2008. Can you guess why these companies went in such different directions?

Now let’s take a look at their income statements. Here are the Revenue and Operating Expenses using the past five quarters for $AMSC. Notice how the revenues and costs increased at a reasonable rate.  Margins are working nicely for this company. Management clearly has a good handle on running this business and keeping it profitable.

When we look at $EMKR’s income statement over the past five quarters, however, we can see that sales and costs are sporadic and that management clearly has trouble making this company profitable. In fact, they are just flat out losing money.

This quick little check can help you decide whether you should even bother flirting much less consider taking him/her home. If you do, you will only be left broke and disgusted in the morning.

Comments »

Fundamentals for Dumb-Me – Part 2: Trust Yourself

Trust yourself and not some goofy sell sider

When you are valuing a company, you need to have an income statement, or model, as the hedge fund folks call it. (Just a quick sideline here; when I ask my analyst friends what they are doing, they love to say that they are “working on models.” They are all men, of course…the analysts, not the models.)

When I first started in this wacky business, I was working for a hedge fund manager who required me to learn how to create models. I would painstakingly look up the historical numbers for sales, costs, cash flow, debt, etc. on the 10K filings and enter them into an Excel worksheet. I found this to be a tedious and miserable task. I always struggled to see the little cells that I had to put the numbers into. In those days, for whatever reason, we didn’t magnify everything so that it was easy to read and see. I had quite a bit of accounting under my belt, but this frustrated me.

The joy came when we looked at the model/spreadsheet together and made predictions about where the company was going and what its true value was. You can get models already built, of course, from Factset or Reuters but these require costly subscriptions upwards of $9K per year.

Soon thereafter, thehusband also got a job in the biz. For the longest time, after I started trading on my own, I would ask him,  my in-house analyst, to provide me with whatever models I needed  and I was fortunate that he could easily provide them to me. After a while, however, I found even reading those models to be tedious. They had way more information than I really needed and I started looking elsewhere for the information I wanted. Historical data is perfectly well represented on Google Finance. I can  easily double check the numbers and fill in the blanks to be sure I am using the correct data, and for the most part, I find they do a pretty good job with accuracy.

If you are still reading this, you are likely interested enough in valuing companies and including fundamentals in your analysis, but I realize that you may not be familiar with all of the accounting terms herein. If you come across a term that you are not acquainted with, just plug it into the keyword search at dictionary . I have taken the liberty of linking a few of the terms for you.

Look at an income statement in Google Finance for a particular company and check to see which direction revenue and costs are going. For example, if costs are going up but sales are not, you might consider that the company is expanding or spending for advertising which could allow for greater sales in the long run. If it is a newer company, it may not even have been profitable yet. Companies need to invest money for Manufacturing, Research and Development, Advertising and of course staff, long before they can sell a product or service and become profitable, so again, direction is of the utmost importance.

I present to you the current income statement for $CSUN below. Please note that all dollar amounts are represented in the millions.

One of the things I like here is that as the Operating Expenses grow quarter over quarter and so does Revenue. In fact, Revenue growth accelerates more rapidly so that the company uses its expenses to earn more money over time resulting in a higher Net Income. This tells me that management is doing their job correctly and costs are being used appropriately; Margins are getting better. I also note that  over the five quarters listed, the company seems to have had some cost issues in the fourth quarter of 2009 but managed to correct this in the more recent quarters. This is also good news with regards to the company’s direction.

If I am concerned about the accuracy of these numbers, I can cross check them against the actual filings to be sure that they are accurate…a whole lot less work than looking up the numbers and plugging them into a spreadsheet to begin with.

I would also like to note that while analysts generally only include Research & Development and sales/admin expenses etc in Operating Expenses, Google Finance also includes Cost of Revenue and calls it Total Operating Expenses. This is simply a matter of terminology, but I want to clear that up in case the term Op/Ex gets thrown around and has a significantly different figure from what is included here. Personally, I feel the Total Op/Ex is a more accurate depiction of what it costs to create the revenue.

The other important piece to this puzzle is the the Diluted Shares and Diluted EPS which you can and should also cross reference in the company’s latest press release. You will want to be sure that the diluted share count is correct as some companies have been known to withhold warrant or conversion shares from their Basic Share count which can make it seem like they have a higher EPS, and as you know, you cannot value a company without an accurate EPS.

Once you have confirmed these numbers, you can move on to forward valuation.  You will want to include the most recent earnings and fill in the blanks for coming quarters. Your best bet is to listen to the conference call so that you can plug in accurate numbers for the current quarter as well as for growth. Doing this as the numbers are released during the call will allow you to make a decision before the stock moves in a particular direction based on the new earnings call. New earnings information will take time to populate so you will want to be on top of it.

Once you have all this information, you can go back and do the work from my first post on fundamentals and can get a fairly accurate valuation of the company you are looking at while knowing that you have crosschecked all the numbers yourself and are not just counting on some analysts point of view.

fundamentals-for-dumb-me-the-very-basics

The Earnings Statement follows.



Comments »

It’s not about Stock Picking

It has been brought to my attention that a false impression has been drawn about 12631. The consensus is that we are all about stock picking. After all, we highlight the great stock picks that BFTO almost daily. This is how I and others have promoted it.

So I feel the need to kill that idea right now. 12631 is not about stock picking. The great stock picks have been the upshot of what we are actually doing which is technical analysis. Even if you are a fundamental investor, it doesn’t hurt to learn some technical analysis.

ChessNwine and I have pointed out many times that if you are going to buy a stock based on fundamentals for a long term play, you  might as well find the best entry using technical analysis. Otherwise, you are just guessing at a bottom and getting into a stock because you believe it to be undervalued, which fundamentally makes sense, but you could easily find yourself sitting in a position that is not ready to move or that hasn’t bottomed yet. As you ride it down into the abyss, your capital is tied up over that period of time unnecessarily.
A little technical analysis would do you good.

If you are already basing some of your trades on technical analysis and wish to upgrade your game, Chess and RC are wonderful teachers. The education there is well presented and comprehensible and includes charts, videos and downloads.
Jusy sayin’.

Comments »

A Tribute to Greatness!

I had intended to focus my near term writing time toward composing the simple fundamental posts that I have promised to you. I am working on them,  but I would be remiss if I did not take a moment to give you a quick summary of the day.

First I will give myself a small pat on the back for finding and executing my $ORCL trade that I highlighted here a couple of days ago. I locked in good gains by selling half of my position after purchasing this morning, but I suspect it will continue to do well so I am holding a nice sized position.  I am doubly confident since it does not report earnings until March and is buoyed by strong earnings in the sector.

But the real reason that I am writing this post tonight, is to tell you about an extraordinary trade that was called today by The Amazing RAGINCAJUN in 12631. Stock picking skills like his are pure genius; He is astonishingly gifted not just for this one trade, but for the consistency with which he so often calls trades like these.

RC pointed out $MOBI to us early in the day in the 12631 Pelican Room, when it was at $5.34. It closed firmly over $6 reaching a high of $6.23 intra-day. He bought this ticker minutes before it started beasting out and those of us who were fortunate enough to follow are grateful to be a part of this greatness for it is truly $MOBI-ssimo!

If you are a trader who is not taking advantage of The PPT, you are a fool. If you are a trader who is not taking advantage of 12631, then you are just not banking as much coin as we are.  If you are not aware of this incredible service, then you cannot be held accountable for your ignorance. Take note and check it out.
If you do already know about us but you are not trading with us in Pelican Stadium, then I have no pity for you, because you have consciously chosen not to be a part of  the supremacy that is available to you. You have chosen to be less.

I take my hat off to RC, chessNwine and all that is 12631 and I feel proud to be a part of it. But tonight I raise my glass in honor of the superb skills of an incredible trader, RaginCajun. Cheers to you good sir and thank you.

Comments »

Didn’t I say thin?

You can never be too rich, but you can be too thin.

I have been mentioning that this market feels thin for some days and today it showed a bit of that svelteness. The set-ups that were working did not last long and the new set-ups had no desire to make anything of themselves.

I felt it early in the trading day and my instinct was to lighten up and wait for a better entry. I had no intention of selling out as I am not one to get caught selling with the masses in a panic, but I saw no reason to stay in set-ups that were on the weak side. Anyone who reads my blogs knows I am a bull for 2011, but as I brought up my concern to fellow traders this morning, they pushed back and I took pause.

To make matters worse, my new trading platform with TradeKing crashed. At 10:30 AM, I found myself posting the following in the Pelican room: “
Woa!!! How fucked up is this? My Trade King window just went to: ” Our website is temporarily unavailable due to technical issues. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause. Please contact us at 877.495.5464 (Available 8am – 6pm ET, Monday – Friday) for assistance. ”

As such, I am looking to change brokers again for the second time this month/year and consequently, I did very little to lighten up, negating my strong instincts. Fate seemed to be in charge.

I had commitments mid-day.

By the time I returned to the market, it had turned for the worse. I cautioned myself not to get caught in panic selling but I saw no reason to just sit back and take it. Some names were definitely breaking down, while a few were not. I held strong, for example, in $RTN, $PH and $NILE (thank you Sir Fly).

The RUT looked nasty. I bought some $TZA for a quick scalp of .21cents. This helped, all in all, to keep my balance at a reasonable level. I sold all but 30% of it before the end of day because I am smart enough to know that it can reverse quickly in either direction and I never hold piece of shit inverse ETF‘s for any length of time…always a short leash. Maybe you have seen my rants about the evil that is $VXX in The PPT. This is one I will not touch, but $TZA for a short term scalp, I will play.  I also preserved some profits by doing some selling in names that were not doing as I bade them to. As a result, I was down only 1% on the day. I have heard other traders speak of being down  3-4% on the day.

The moral of the story:
Don‘t let the losers get you down. If you have a losing trade, Get The Fuck Out Early!

OR…

ALWAYS TRUST TheWife’s INSTINCTS!

Comments »

Ideas With Your Morning Coffee

Good Morning! I hope you are all well rested and ready to tackle the day.

I would like to share a couple of ideas that I have been mulling over with my morning coffee.

The first one is $ROK. From Reuters, “Rockwell Automation, Inc. (Rockwell Automation), incorporated in 1996, is a global provider of industrial automation power, control and information solutions. The Company has two segments: Architecture & Software, and Control Products & Solutions. Products for both segments are marketed primarily under the Allen-Bradley, A-B, Rockwell Software, ICS Triplex and FactoryTalk brand names. Major markets served by both segments include food and beverage, transportation, oil and gas, metals, mining, home and personal care, pulp and paper and life sciences.”

$ROK has been tracking well with $PH, another ticker that is currently in my port. Note the classic bullish flag that is breaking to the upside in the chart below and the strong buying volume. There is a strong base around $72.75, so downside risk is only about 3%.
Also, $IMGN, ImmunoGen Inc., develops antibody based therapeutics to fight cancer. How cool is that? While I normally have a “just say no” to bio-tech and drug companies, I am pretty excited about the work these guys are doing. If the price action dictates and I decide to get in, I will be very careful and I advise the same to anyone who considers playing this name. Any drug company is still volatile just because Wall Street is fearful of them, so a very close watch would be in order. I have posted the chart showing a breakout above the bullish ascending triangle and strong buying volume, with a base around $9.40. Note that this name is also on RaginCajun’s Atomic Bombs screen.

I will reiterate that this market feels thin in the short term so be careful out there. I am still a bull for 2011 but I am prepared for a pull back in the near term.

Comments »