iBankCoin
Joined Jan 1, 1970
41 Blog Posts

Cave Emptor et Cave Hurricanem

hurricane24

Two part post: Natural Gas admonishments followed by Hurricane Bill admonishments. This one is going to be close, boys.

For those wanting the rapid-fire cliff notes version, FOLLOW Dr.Cane09 on Twitter for regular updates regarding the Tropics, Trading, and misc other weather stuff.

.

UNG–Cave Emptor

With September ’09 natural gas approaching $3.00/MMBTU, a level not seen in seven years, one might think that UNG, the ETF that tracks this commodity, would be very attractive, especially with cane season moving into gear. Erroneous!

On July 8th, the UNG Fund ran out of shares due to increased investor appetite that resulted in a volume spike beginning in May.  Looking at Figure 1 below, average daily volume has gone up more than 10x  since the beginning of the year. Total shares issued increased to 281 Million, more than 8x the start of year total.

ung81909

Figure 1: 1 year chart of UNG showing a surge in volume and an intermediate volume when UNG ran out of shares

Amidst CTIC investigations into  commodity-driven speculation, the fund has not yet re-issued shares. The basic argument regarding cracking down on speculation is this. Approximately a week before the front month contracts expire, UNG sells all of its front month contracts and rolls over those assets into next month’s contracts. For example, this past week UNG has been selling all of its Sept ’09 calls and buying up the same value in Oct ’09 calls. Some believe that massive selling and buying has been driving volatility and should be illegal. It is estimated that the UNG Fund holds up to 80% of the contracts in the front month period. While the SEC last week announced it was permitting the fund to release one billion more shares, the fund is planning to hold off awaiting CTIC clarification regarding caps and restrictions.

As a result of limited shares, the fund has been performing more as a stock rather than as a tracking fund, meaning that it is driven not only by the underlying commodity, but also by investor demand. With a last price right at $12.00, UNG  is now trading at a 12% premium to its NAV, or net asset value of $10.70. In other words, UNG is trading as if the price of September natural gas is about $3.50, rather than the actual $3.10.

Thus, while natural gas may be “cheap”, UNG is actually about 12.5% too expensive. This is terrific if you have been a holder of UNG, as your money has significantly outperformed the underlying commodity. However, if you are a prospective buyer looking to get into the fund, this puts you at risk.

There are a couple of different outcomes in this situation. First, should the CTIC decide that market speculators have not been responsible for commodity volatility and does not plan to impose restrictions, the UNG fund will likely ssue new shares. As a result, the commodity would immediatly revert to its NAV and all shareholders would take at least a 12% haircut. Ouch.

Second, the CTIC determines that funds like UNG are responsible for destabilizing the markets and introduces harsh restrictions and regulations. Not only can UNG not issue more shares, but the fund is too large as it is and must divest some of its assets, or even shut down. As this must be done at the NAV, investors would again lose the 12% premium.

Lastly,  a sort of middle ground. UNG somehow gains permission to issue new shares at the current premium under certain CTIC restrictions. I’m not entirely sure how this could happen within the current framwework of the fund. However, if the premium does remain in place, investor appetite will likely decline as fewer and fewer are willing to pay increasingly high premiums. This might drive the price back down towards the NAV as the market finds itself overwhelmed with shares that are no longer in such high demand.

In conclusion, I still believe that natural gas is undervalued, given the low rig count, production cutbacks, the oil:gas ratio, hurricane season, etc. However, I do not believe that UNG is the best way to play the commodity right now due to the inherent risks I have just discussed. Additionally, the contango, or spread between each month is over 10% for each months. Each time UNG rolls over its contracts, investors thus lose a further 10%.

Rather, I believe that playing individual stocks is the way to go. Since UNG dropped below my cost basis of $13, I have been trimming my position in the fund and have been allocating some of those assets to some big producers, including Chesapeake (CHK) and Southwestern Energy (SWN) during the course of this pullback. Other smaller cap plays such as OMNI and NGAS that are more heavily influenced by the price of NG may be attractive as well. I have also built up my cash position as I believe the market to have downside risk right here. I still have a  position in the fund and will likely continue to hold these shares, but it is not one of my top 5 positions.

In regards to tomorrows supply report, I am projecting an injection of 55 BCF, above the average of 42 BCF, but way below last year’s 88 BCF injection. If realized, it would be the lowest injection of the summer. For a good (yet bearish) analytic discussion of natural gas inventory injections heading into the winter withdrawal season, see CavemanForecaster’s latest post on his blog.

.

The Tropics

bill81909

Hurricane Bill has put on an impressive burst of intensification and is now a dangerous 135 mph category 4 storm. This is about as organized as a storm can get and looks downright gorgeous on satellite. As it enters warmer waters, Bill may continue to intensify further and could approach category 5 strength over the next day or two. Bill has a tropical storm-force wind radius of nearly 400 miles that is generating waves estimated at an almost biblical 80-90 feet near the center.

The storm has finally turned to the Northwest, with a heading of 315 degrees, in response to the trough that I mentioned in my last post. Overnight the the computer models have shifted slightly westward, increasing the potential impacts of Bill to the extreme Northeast coastline. The most westerly models, the NGFDL and the NOGAPS, take Bill within 100 miles of New England.  Shown below in Figure 3 is the GFS model run for Sunday at 8am showing Bill at his closest approach to the Coast.

gfs81909

Figure 2: Latest GFS model run showing Bill side-swiping the Northeast

The explanations and tracks provided in my post last night still hold true, just shifted west. The degree to which the track shifts west will depend on its speed. A faster foward motion would allow it to “beat” the trough to the east coast and move further west before it gets turned away. On the other hand, a slower motion would allow the trough to make more eastward progress and steer Bill away from the coast earlier.

Most of the East Coast will likely see moderate to locally severe beach erosion and Eastern Massachusetts and Long Island will likely see some wind gusts approaching tropical storm force and the occasionally heavy outer rainbands. Fortunately, Bill will not be Category 4 storm at this time, and will probably pass by as a lopsided Cat 1 or Cat 2. Bill will then likely make landfall in Nova Scotia or Newfoundland as a rapidly weakening Category 1 hurricane or strong tropical storm where impacts will again be modest. On a scale of 1 to 10, where a 10 is Katrina and a 1 is Claudette last weekend, I project Bill’s affects on the US to merit a 2.5.  Should the computer models shift any further west, I would begin to get concerned as this is a very large and dangerous storm.

Right now, I see the affects of Bill being similar to to those of Hurricane Edouard in 1996, shown below in Figure 3.

edouard96

Figure 3: Hurricane Edouard, 1996

Both Edouard and Bill were classic Cape Verde hurricanes. Both peaked as strong Category 4 storms had very large wind-fields. Edouard passed within 90 miles of New England as an 80 mph hurricane doing $6 Million in wind damage and drowning two people. Right now, it looks like Bill may stay further offshore.

Elsewhere in the tropics, the remnants of Ana have entered the Gulf and are diminishing. Re-development is unlikely. A wave off of Africa needs to be watched for development over the next three to five days.

Stateside, the Pacific Northwest has once again entered the sauna. Temperatures in Portland today could approach 100 as a strong offshore flow is pushing hot air down from the high deserts of the interior Northwest. Additionally, the east coast is basking in some of the hottest weather of the summer. Highs in Boston and New York have eclipsed 90 over the past two days. Additionally, the large dome of high pressure that has brought these temperatures is also responsible for stagnating the atmosphere and allowing for a build-up of pollutant-laden haze. Some people may have noticed that it was more difficult to breathe over the past few days.

Warm temperatures and the risk of poor air quality will continue for the next few days until a strong trough of low pressure sweeps through the area Friday afternoon ushering in cooler temperaures. It is this same trough that is forecast to sweep Bill out to sea.

Note II: Major Karma Points to the first person to correctly identify the storm shown at the top.  This is going to be a common theme of posts for the foreseeable future. A small hurricane warning flag will be awarded to the individual with the most points at the conclusion of the hurricane season, provided that they have at least 12.

1. Wabisabi-10

2. DPeezy-9

3. TraderCaddy-4

4. Yogi and Boo Boo-3

5. Jim-1

Disclaimer: Forecasts and Opinions are my own and are subject to error. Please rely on official National Weather Service forecasts.

If you enjoy the content at iBankCoin, please follow us on Twitter

23 comments

  1. DPeezy

    As Van Morrison once said, G-L-O-R-I-A…Gloooorriaaaa

    Storm of the Century, my ass.

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  2. DPeezy

    Wow…could you imagine if Bill somehow shifted all the way West and hit, say Long Island as a Cat. 5?!

    Do hurricanes that move up the East Coast like this guy is likely to do have any effect on maritime shipping? I’d imagine it would be carving a path straight through major shipping lanes, no?

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  3. TraderCaddy

    Hit Long Island?
    Hide the polo ponies in the Hamptons.
    At least Fly would get the Hurricane he desires so much.
    The wrong area of the country but hey it’s still a Hurricane.

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  4. Dr. 'Cane

    It would be very difficult for a Category five hurricane to make it as far north as Long Island due to the cold ocean temperatures and strong wind shear associated with the mid-latitudes. The closest we have come was the 1938 “Long Island Express.” This storm made the same turn that Bill is making and then accelerated northward, traveling as fast as 70 mph (most storms travel less than 20) making landfall in Long Island as a strong category 3 storm. However, you can tack on a storm’s forward motion to the right front quadrant (and subtract it from the left quadrant ). Thus, some areas just right of the storm saw wind gusts near 200 mph, way over cat 5 strength. 800 people were killed and damage was over 6 Billion. The 1938 storm was able to maintain this intensity due to its fast forward speed which allowed it to cross the cold water quickly before it had a chance to weaken…

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  5. Spooky

    I’ll be in the Hamptons on Saturday, and I used to do a bit of surfing. If the conditions are right, it could be an epic surf day, but probably not until sunday or monday after the storm passes… Still, I’ve seen it when Dune Road was a foot under water and the beach itself was completed flooded with 10 foot waves breaking 100 feet out and 15 footers breaking 300 feet out. If you’ve never been on a surfboard when those babies are rolling in, you don’t know what fear/excitement is. It’s like the ocean can pick you up and fling you through the air…. nothing like it that I know…

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
    • Dr. 'Cane

      Spooky, Sunday looks like the best wave day with max heights around 15-18 feet. You may start to see some 10 footers rolling in Saturday afternoon though. If you want to look at projected wave heights, check out .

      • 0
      • 0
      • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
      • Spooky

        I’ll check out some surf reports. If you’ve got an iphone, by the way, there’s one that has global surf reports that are dead on. Called “Surf Report” from Oakley. If only I still surfed! Now I just surf the markets, alas.

        • 0
        • 0
        • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
      • Ricketts

        Great post. Thanks for the time/effort you put into them. I was wondering where I can locate wave height forecast maps similar to the one you included in your previous post. I’m planning a fishing trip off the Jersey coast this weekend, so I’d like to keep an eye on the surf. I’m thinking I’ll probably have to reschedule. Thanks.

        • 0
        • 0
        • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  6. Yogi & Boo Boo

    Great, you answered my question about the 1938 Hurricane and Bill before I had a chance to ask it. 🙂

    What’s the probability we get more storms like Bill this season?

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
    • Dr. 'Cane

      The dry Saharan Dust Layer that had been putting the kabash on Cape Verde-style storms through last week has finally retreated to the north allowing the atmosphere off of Africa to moisten up. This should allow that region to become the hurricane factory it normally is this time of year. Several models are indicating some sort of development in out there over the next week. However, despite The Fly’s hurricane saber-rattling, I think things are going to calm down after Bill, at least temporarily…

      • 0
      • 0
      • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  7. Cuervos Laugh

    Bill will then likely make landfall in Nova Scotia or Newfoundland as a rapidly weakening Category 1 hurricane or strong tropical storm where impacts will again be modest.

    I’m hearing folks starting to talk about “Juan” again around here.
    As for me, as long as I’m not stuck on the 101 when it hits – we could use some cooler weather that’s for sure.

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
    • Dr. 'Cane

      CuervosLaugh, yes, I imagine you will hear more about the new “White Juan” over the next day or two. Right now four out of my favorite 6 models have the storm making landfall somewhere in Nova Scotia, probably as a category one storm, or maybe a very marginal category 2. That being said, I don’t think it will be another Juan. First, Juan was a fully tropical system at the time, symmetric and vertically stacked, and it made landfall essentially “of its own accord”. Bill will be zipping northeastward under the vice-grip of a strong trough, probably beginning to undergo some sort of pre-extratropical transition. Second, and more imporantly, Juan made landfall from the southeast, at nearly a right angle to the coastline. Bill will make landfall/brush the coast while moving NNE, which, due to the SW-NE orientation of the coastline of Nova Scotia, means his landfall will be at a much more oblique angle. While this makes it difficult to pinpoint an exact landfall location, it means that the stormsurge will be smaller and most of the province will be on the weaker west side of the storm. I’m not saying Bill won’t be bad, just that you have a few things going for you…

      • 0
      • 0
      • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  8. Dr. 'Cane

    The storm is Gloria, and DPeezy ties for the lead. Hurricane Gloria made landfall on Long Island as a strong category 2 storm with 105 mph winds on September 27, 1985. It was the strongest hurricane to hit the area since Donna in 1960. Overall, GLoria did over $1 Billion in damage and killed 8 people.

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  9. Dr. 'Cane

    Update: Natural gas injection of 52 BCF for last week. This beat my temperature-based projection of 55 BCF by 3 BCF (which was similar to projections of various analysts), though it is still above this week’s average of +42 BCF. Natural gas fell nearly 3% to under $3.00 on the news. However, UNG is down only .15%, further distancing the NAV gap, which I discussed above. Good for shareholders, bad for the integrity of the fund.
    Hurricane Bill remains on track and it is appearing more and more likely that Bermuda and areas of the extreme Northeast US will experience Tropical Storm-force winds for a period on Sunday. The storm weakened to a 120 mph category 3 storm due to increased wind shear and an eyewall replacement cycle, but is moving over warmer water and more favorable atmospheric conditions and may restrengthen to a Cat 4.

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  10. The Zipper

    Might one purchase GAZ instead of UNG, or is there a significant difference that would make one prefer UNG today?

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
    • Dr. 'Cane

      Yes, GAZ tracks NG day-to-day movements in the same way the UNG does (although I’m not sure why it is up today). It is more thinly traded and has underperformed UNG since its inception last summer, which is why I have generally avoided it. I have not read their prospectus but would assume it is managed in a way similiar to UNG.
      It does not have the same issues regarding shares as UNG does so it might be a better place to get long the commodity as it is trading very close to its NAV. I wouldn’t be surprised to see volume increase in that fund over the next few weeks as people begin to get out of UNG due to the premium over its NAV.

      • 0
      • 0
      • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
      • The Zipper

        Oh well:

        Barclays suspends iPath nat-gas ETN issuance
        BY MarketWatch
        — 06:59 AM ET 08/21/2009

        LONDON (MarketWatch) — Barclays said it’s temporarily suspended any further issuances of the iPath Dow Jones-AIG natural gas subindex total return exchange-traded notes . This suspension may cause fluctuations in the trading value of such Notes. Barclays added the move may affect other commodity-linked iPath ETNs in light of current market dynamics and ongoing regulatory review.

        • 0
        • 0
        • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  11. DPeezy

    Story on Yahoo…World sets ocean temperature record

    Should that continue we could see some big storms, no?

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
    • Dr. 'Cane

      Dpeezy…with regards to the article/your question: kinda-sorta. First, this warming is occurring primarily at higher latitudes, rather than the tropics, so the immediate effect on hurricanes will not be too great. Looking at the big picture however, this is actually the worst place to see warming, as warming in the north latitudes/arctic ocean can initiate a nasty positive feedback loop. Warming of the arctic accelerates polar ice sheet melting exposing the ocean beneath (there is no land under the arctic). Because salt water absorbs more energy than ice does, the melting results in a vicious cycle which feeds on itself, melting more ice and exposing more ocean to absorb energy, warming the entire planet. This is a favorite of Al Gore, but it does actually have some merit.
      With regards to hurricanes, I wrote this in the comments a few days ago regarding a similiar question, with the quick answer being, we’re not sure.
      This is actually a very tough question that deserves more than a comment posting, and I plan to do it justice in a later post. In a very basic theoretical sense, one would think hurricanes might become both stronger and more frequent since warming temperatures mean warmer sea surface temperatures which means more fuel for storms. However, there is no substantiated evidence that hurricanes have become more frequent. One of the main problems is that our data set for yearly tropical cyclones is frustratingly small…dating only back to the mid 1800s. Additionally, we didn’t have satellites covering the entire oceans until the mid-1960s meaning that many over open waters were invariably missed skewing the data set towards the present. Thus our only really solid data goes back to about 1960. Based on this limited data, it actually appears that hurricane frequency functions in more of an oscillatory cycle, independant of ocean temperature: The 50s-60s were active, the 70s,80s, and early 90s were quiet, and 1995-present represents another active cycle.
      In terms of intensity, there is some evidence that hurricanes in some ocean basins have grown stronger. I will discuss in a later post.

      • 0
      • 0
      • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"