iBankCoin

Donald's Penthouse

Donald's Penthouse

Man Unleashes On Kangaroo With Swift Punch To The Face While His Dog Retreats!

Wed Dec 7, 2016 12:48pm EST 1

Man finds his dog in a kangaroo’s death grip. While the dog flees man defends kangaroo’s fighting stance with a swift punch to the face. Kangaroo stunned. Man walks away.

Now he’s under investigation, apparently. For what? Who knows. Cruelty to animals by way of saving his dog’s life I suppose?

Kangaroo could not be reached for comment on this brutal assault on his rights to strangle, then eat dogs without interference from dog owners.

Story here.

roopunch

 

 

Comments »

How This Election Can Be The Greatest Thing That Ever Happened To You (regardless of who wins)

Tue Nov 8, 2016 1:28pm EST 2

Regardless of what happens, I consider this experience a success. We all have done our best on both sides vetting the candidates and fighting for what we believe is best for America. We have properly discounted expectations of how the next president will do allowing for a strong possibility of exceeding expectations.

We have all held the candidates feet to the proverbial fire on the issues that matter. We have thrown our spear at the establishment like King Leonidas did at the “god-king” Xerxes. Our voice has been heard.

Let me pause and say thank you Fly, and readers of IBankCoin. I felt I got the messages out that I needed to, and reached enough people for the good and important ideas to potentially spread.

Our battle for liberty is not done, however we made our case and cast our votes. (You did vote, right? If not, do it now!)
We may see Trump at the next state of the union address, or we may see him on TrumpTV. We may see Hillary impeached and thrown in jail, or lead the nation as the commander in chief. We may see the illusions of our vision of the future wash away and the uncertain chaotic nature of events play out differently than we expect. We will find out soon enough.

But through the challenges, we must endure. Through the hopes, we shall dream.

I want to restate our forefathers declaration of independence in modern, less eloquent language: It is obvious and apparent that all are born with equal unalienable rights. We institute government with the purpose of protecting these rights, and that it is the right of the people to alter, abolish, or impeach any form of government should it become a threat to our liberties. This is the warning shot to the establishment, as our proverbial voices over the loudspeaker booms “Regardless of outcome, institute term limits and protect our liberties, or we will find someone that will.”

The forefathers struck the proverbial dagger into the tyrannical establishment with the declaration of independence and ensuing war and were willing to wage war to defend our rights to vote for a candidate promising to drain the swamp and clean up the establishment peacefully.

They made the decision back then that liberty was worth risking their lives for so that their children may have a better tomorrow. I believe a lot changes, but one thing that never does is the passions and emotions of a populous. The willingness of mankind to wage war for liberties will not be silenced with a single election.

I fear that if we don’t have a peaceful, fair transition of power to someone willing to battle the corruption, our liberties–as Reagan once said–may only be a generation away from extinction. Oppress people enough and they will eventually be willing to risk their lives over hope of something better. However, I’m optimistic that if we don’t make the right choice, we will still have the ability to vote in anti-establishment candidates into 2018 and 2020 where we have a chance for real liberty–given mankind’s perseverance and resolve allows us to overcome, shine the beacon of liberty and survive until then. I encourage you to keep the revolution against the establishment a peaceful one, if possible.

It is my contention, that there are radical elements on the regressive left seeking to undermine our democracy–some of which are outlined here. We must destroy them ideologically through exposing their ideas. The enemy of the evil darkness of fascism and Marxism is an unveiling of the light of truth, exposing them for what they are.

In the title, I teased how this election can be the greatest thing that ever happened to you. I believe this will be true if you learn the lessons that were presented. I will get to summarizing this soon, but first what the majority of my audience likely wants to hear.

Trump is not his past, he is not his actions, he is not his promises. If he were, he wouldn’t have our vote (certainly not mine). Trump instead represents a medium through which we cast our voice about the directional aims of the country as well as the party. Hillary represents the status quo. She represents a different direction filled with selling of favors, using tax payer money, personal enrichment at the expense of suboptimal policy and putting lives at risk in the process and another step towards the regressive left of in my opinion failed policy, failed methodology, and failed ideology.

Presidents are our representatives, not our role models. If they were our role models, we certainly wouldn’t have had the scandal ridden Kennedy who while in office spoke out against secrecy, spoke out against oppressive government, spoke in favor of personal accountability (more so than any democrat since) and avoided a missile crisis and even inspired us to dream big and go to the moon.

In the modern era things about other great leaders character that are hidden from history would have prevented them from taking office I won’t name names, but I assure you alleged “high character” presidents have skeletons hidden. Presidents are not expected to be perfect in our collective march towards liberty. They are our surrogates to carry the bright light of liberty forward. The candidate represents our directional arrow pointing towards the things we want. In this case, Trump represents term limits, ending corruption, transforming the system and managing debt and monetary reform and demanding a higher standard of management and leadership of our debt and using term limits as a means to demand better leaders of this country that are more representative of the people and that have to live in the same class as those they govern.

Most importantly, good leaders know how to build off of previous experiences and make things better and improve their odds of success as they go. Certain policies will have challenges that could be seen as “failures”, but perseverance will ultimately determine it’s success. Good leaders also know when to cut their losses.

This ties into the teaser of a title. There are certain traits that the successful possess. Certain approaches to life that they take. That is what you must be mindful of, and that is what I will speak on.

If Trump is a “failure” for managing risk properly while having multiple bankruptcies in individual companies during his path to an expanding net worth and brand having been placed on over 500 entities, then his collection of failures are collectively a great success. He “failed forward” until he found success.

America is filled with a history of individual failures of party, government, and enterprise with many past failures and future failures masquerading around as success stories. Every business given enough time fails or consolidates, but the system itself, need not. For prior to every failure or exit (merger or buy out) of enterprise, people generate capital through working, products get developed, parts get ordered and shipped to others who use them and things like them. Other companies receive orders and use them to make products and generate profit, and customers receive products while the “failure” provides a blueprint of what went wrong, but also what went right along the way prior to failure.

Everyone who dares to dream and aims for the stars will have failures. Life isn’t about how hard you hit, but how willing you are to get up. Life starts everyday by leaving your last failure behind and getting up again to go out and try to fail brilliantly once again. Sleep is a failure to have energy and a recognition that this failure will make one stronger. working out is lifting weights until you can’t lift it anymore and fail to have strength and it makes you stronger. The government is a system whereby every president has a designed term of 4 years and 2 terms. Every party has had their share of many failures in the primary and failures in the national election only to see their candidate that does win go on to fail to enact all of the policy he wants, and eventually fail to continue being president after 4 or 8 years.

If you learn one thing from this election cycle that you can bring into your personal life, let it be that failure is the engine to get you directionally where you want to go. You will propel the failure behind you like a ship’s engine kicking out force behind it repeatedly.

Split testing thousands of headlines on ads as many online entrepreneurs do to ultimately decide on 1 is a “failure”. Thomas Edison “failed” tens of thousands of times only to eliminate all the ways that wouldn’t work successfully and get the results he wanted. Nikola Tesla was perhaps more brilliant and a better inventor, but he did things in his mind until done successfully, and didn’t seem to always grasp the nuances of business and raising capital because he didn’t understand the value of using failure to his advantage. He may have even been right about the ways in which Edison could have been more efficient, but his view compared to Edison contrasts one of many reasons why Edison was a greater success in terms of both financially and setting up an entity that outlived him and is still alive to this day in General Electric.

The republicans had over 17 candidates that failed all so they could nominate the one who succeeded. If Trump succeeds it’s great evidence of the power of failure. If Trump “fails” in this election, he will still have gained probably over 50 million supporters. He will likely launch Trump-TV where he will be the face of politics, economics, negotiating, etc. Many of his followers will go along and become customers. His failure will propel him in the direction of greater success and lead to an even greater failure as all his past failures have done… In addition to many successes. All the experience, brand, support, connections and resources he will carry with him whether Trump TV succeeds or fails, and when Trump ultimately dies, his children will take the knowledge and resources and brand and teachings that he bestowed upon them forward to fail-succeed as well.

I decided to jump at the opportunity to blog about the election because I wanted my ideas to spread to like minded individuals. It doesn’t matter that many of these ideas I’ve compiled from other people, or that many others will carry those ideas forward and get credit for them. I define success a little bit differently in this case since my goals here are different. If my ideas are heard by enough, and spread by enough people, when the political blog is detonated and it’s back to finance those ideas will still be in people’s mind. I have become a conduit for the information flow that alters the way people think, potentially forever if enough people spread it to enough spreaders of information and so on.

So take these ideas and share them. Build upon them if you’d like. Apply your own filter of how you see it and put it in your own words. There are principals, philosophies and approaches to life that are worth fighting for. For now, I’m hopeful that the balance of powers and additional scrutiny of the candidates will protect us from any devastating consequences, especially should Trump win as he has properties around the world he wants to protect by maintaining peace. But Hillary has such low approval that we all will be watching her, and all our representatives will be ready to impeach her as well at the first sign that she isn’t representing our interests. Regardless of how corrupt Washington is, the representatives still know their children and grandchildren will have to grow up in the world they and their corporate donors create, as long as the people are willing to hold them accountable.

Now more than ever, the magnifying glass is on our elected leaders to get the big pieces right and the people are ready to hold them accountable regardless of what happens. Speak up with your mind, your heart and your vote and let this election be a reaffirmation of our independence as we all aim to make America better and ourselves better.

Comments »

Frustrated Ex-Clinton Operative Unleashes Powerful Tweet Rage

Tue Nov 8, 2016 12:42am EST 5

Update:There’s a good chance the account was fake. I don’t know for sure but it looks that way. First tweet late September. Early tweets looked more trolly. Some people said Scott deleted the account On October 19th and some troll picked up the username with the underscore.
However, he still manages to have personal pictures and pictures of Jake Taper and Podesta. Those could have been borrowed online.
img_0505Never underestimate the magic of frustration and dissatisfaction of a recently betrayed Clinton operative. Scott Foval has been spitting fire out back at the Hillbullies that made him what he is.

This is a follow up to the last one:

False Flag is the modus operandi of Hillary?

Comments »

Scott Foval Surprise: Clinton Insider Flips!

Tue Nov 8, 2016 12:08am EST 2

Update:The Scott Foval account appears to likely be a fake from troll who picked up the name after Scott deleted his account.
I want to thank everyone for reating and sharing my post about the racist nature of the intellectual white leftists behind black lives matter’s crisis politics. It may have been a more important topic than I knew at the time. At the time it seemed a little off topic and I couldn’t quite connect it to Clinton’s operatives, but I felt it was too important to ignore. Apparently so did some of you as it is nearing 1,000 views.

Well now thanks to recently unemployed Scott Foval, it looks like a major connection is lining up.

You probably remember Scott Foval as the guy in the glasses in the James O Keafe aka Project Veritas videos.

img_0504

He and Bob Creamer were fired, but now it appears Scott Foval is on twitter playing the role of a disgruntaled employee flipping on his ex employer.

One tweet he said he should have been given a better severance package Suggesting the reason for flipping.

He laughs at Hillary “barely being able to walk” off the plane’s platform.

He says Deray McKesson is a paid agitator.

He also asks if it would Shock you if the same paid agitators at BLM were also  those who were paid to incite violence at Trump events?

I haven’t had time to look into Deray, but I’ve heard he’s very well off financially.

Scott Fova has all kinds of tweets out there, be sure to check them out before he takes it down.

And I can’t let this one go after the fun interaction Ibankcoin had with Jake Tapper.

Aarron Black seem s to have been involved according to  Scott

 

Shots fired.

Man, you definitely would rather have Scott on your side rather than against you.

 

Comments »

The Peculiar Case Of James Comey

Mon Nov 7, 2016 8:15pm EST 1

S

I’ve had a lot of fun watching both the right and the left make complete bafoons out of themselves defending-shaming-defending Comey back and forth and everywhere between.

There’s one that I can come up with that makes some sense.

For context, Comey had a long standing relationship with the FBI and credibility on both the right and left as well as a great reputation from both sides of being smart, tough, honorable, and credible. He was hired by Bush and his 10 year contract was renewed under Obama. There’s nothing blatantly partisan about him that would get in the way of him being objective. There’s no evidence of him being partisan in the past.

So with that context, let me lay out a scenario that puts his actions into perspective:
1)Comey believed that Hillary was guilty, but they weren’t going to indict, either because they didn’t believe they had sufficient evidence to conclusively deliver a guilty verdict and prove intent…(say with 90% confidence interval as successful conviction rate of people tried is consistently in the 80-95 percentile). Or more likely, the crimes weren’t sufficient enough to literally de-legitimize an election and undermine a democracy.
Note:It wasn’t his job to determine whether or not Hillary should be put on trial. Nor was it FBI policy to publicly comment on an ongoing investigation.

2)Comey held a press conference after blandly sinister Attorney General Loretta Lynch (from now on referred to as BS for her nickname Blandly Sinister) met privately with Bill Clinton in a way that intended on hiding that meeting from the press. Comey had a press conference and essentially protected Attorney General Loretta Lynch from making the decision.

Had he not, questions about the functionality of the republic would come under play. Had he said nothing, the american people wouldn’t know the extent of Hillary’s wrongdoings. He wasn’t going to let her get away with it without letting the people know.

3)Having said that, this is a presidential candidate we’re talking about. And so he wasn’t going to sit idlely, even if it was policy not to talk about it. So he took a hit to his personal character by basically publicly saying what the FBI found, (specifically on a 4th of July weekend when ratings are the lowest) and then saying they weren’t really going to recommend pursuing the manners at this time regarding mishandling classified information. That didn’t mean they wouldn’t still gather information about Hillary (I have a feeling the real issue at hand is the Clinton Foundation).

4)If you are moving to prosecute you want the best odds possible and the most serious crime possible. You aren’t going to risk the FBI’s reputation, nor let someone get hit with only a minor offense if there’s more at stake. You gather all the evidence for ALL crimes, and you try to get as many as possible to stick.

5)His intent was NOT to influence an election, but provide valuable information relevant to the qualification of the candidate.

So here’s some more information:

1)IF Comey indicts Hillary (or at least in essence by recommending trial). AND IF BS Lynch doesn’t follow suit, the credibility of government is in question.

2)IF Comey indicts Hillary AND BS does follow through, the democrats have no candidate, or at least not one represented by the people, and they already had their primary. The election is not credible to the people, Trump either wins by default, or someone not properly vetted through the primary process wins.

If Comey says she’s totally innocent or says nothing, he’s concealing information of the public.

So Comey intentionally picks a date where he will have the least influence over the result, delivers all the reasons Hillary should be in jail but says the FBI can’t prove intent so we are not looking to put her on trial at this time.

Now of course everyone on the left love Comey for basically saying end of discussion. Everyone on the right says.. you have all this on her and you aren’t at least going to put her on trial? WTF?

Well it’s not over yet.

Somehow a Weiner who has a first name, this time it’s A-N-T-H-O-N-Y may again change the course of politics. Apparently Hillary had all sorts of emails on his device and many of them went to Huma Abedin (which shouldn’t have). How it got there probably isn’t known, but it seems at least someone was reckless with information. After additional investigation, the FBI basically made the determination that they again couldn’t prove intent. Someone could make the case that Hillary was hacked, that she claims ignorance about setting up the private server and having bad security or that if she’s guilty it implicates half of Washington for contacting Hillary via email. It’s a decent case against her, but not worth undermining an election over.

So Comey probably at the most impactful time possible this time basically says “by the way, we have a lot more on Hillary, her closest aid, her recklessness with classified information and carelessness at best, bad intentions, and so on.”

Well now the republicans were thrilled and suddenly Comey has respect again and the democrats suddenly think Comey is this evil partisan hack after praising him for integrity.

You can’t spell Comedy without COMEY, and as soon as they added ANthony Weiner, the D was there to make it comedy.

(It’s the reaction by the people that determines it to be comedy, not Comey’s actions themselves)

Well of course, 3 days before the election Comey sends on final “switcheroo” (allegedly) in there which basically reiterated his original position on “secretary Clinton” (not presidential elect Hillary).

Dear Messrs. Chairmen: 

I write to supplement my October 28, 2016 letter that notified you the FBI would be taking additional investigative steps with respect to former Secretary of State Clinton’s use of a personal email server. Since my letter, the FBI investigative team has been working around the clock to process and review a large volume of emails from a device obtained in connection with an unrelated criminal investigation. During that process, we reviewed all of the communications that were to or from Hillary Clinton while she was Secretary of State.

Based on our review, we have not changed our conclusions that we expressed in July with respect to Secretary Clinton.

I am very grateful to the professionals at the FBI for doing an extraordinary amount of high-quality work in a short period of time.

Sincerely yours, 
James B. Comey
Director

Bold Emphasis Mine.

Note the language. How easy would it be to say “We found nothing damaging”. Or “we absolve Hillary of her crimes”. Instead he carefully worded this to essentially reiterate the initial position. It was SPUN as an “innocent verdict” or “Comey finally comes around”. But the actual letter itself was a reiteration.

Remember his initial position. They didn’t have enough yet to proceed with a trial at the moment specifically for mishandeling classified information. They said nothing in July about the Clinton Foundation which the IRS began investigation into in July, and the FBI is presumably investigating as well.

So Comey is attempting to reiterate the information which is publicly searchable on the internet for voters. He doesn’t want to influence the election.. but he does want to make sure relevant information is accessible.

So if Clinton is elected and later impeached, or if you find that because it happened before she was elected that you can’t impeach her and you are saying to yourself, “Why didn’t anyone warn me about this”… someone did. He warned you with great cost to his professional career, wonderful reputation and “persecution” by the “court of public opinion”, in a way that didn’t undermine the democracy or credibility of the election. In fact, he warned you 3 separate times. He probably is hoping people do the right thing and knows there is potentially great risk to the credibility if Clinton wins (AND ALSO is later found guilty), but he respects the nature of the constitutional framing too much to interfere too directly.

Comey warned us all, he still makes sure the people have a choice. The best chance people have of seeing Hillary face justice is by voting for the alternative.

 

Scott Adams presented this idea here. In my mind he was a little off the second time. It’s possible there was something disqualifying IN the emails (related to foundation), but for me the disqualifying part is that Hillary is not worthy of having the nation’s secrets. The headliner is the carelessness (at best) to let people around he that are so comprimisable.

Comments »

Fare Thee Well

Mon Nov 7, 2016 5:28pm EST 0

We’ll folks, (extra Obama) the election is upon us.  As I noted before, nobody gives a fuck, this is generally true and generally confirmed by recent news being printed about Trump and Hillary.

If Hillary wins, this is a win for the top 10% of the country definitely.  Those people make their money mostly off the backs of an underpaid labor force (in terms of productivity not supply and demand).  They got us into this mess and they will be damned if they get us out of it without a fight.  Expect stocks to continue to rise under Hillary barring some sort of change of heart in the Federal Reserve or abroad.  Hillary is Wall St.’s candidate so don’t expect domestic issues to be anything but buying opportunities as you all probably know.

Trump will be a victory for anybody who hopes that the elite haven’t optimized controlling the masses.  The thing is, it seems right now that the computers and those who control them are ahead of the people.  This can be seen generally in the Cubs world series victory.  Theo Epstein essentially optimized winning in baseball (around every 5-10 years is much greater than expectation).  He is Billy Bean of teams with deep pockets and advanced analytics will be part of every team for the rest of baseball history because of him.

I know a lot of you voted but I have a warning.  If you’re voting for Hillary for any reason other than you are a young woman or somebody looking for a free handout, don’t be surprised eight years from now when you want to vote for somebody who will help the country you’ll be stuck with candidates that make Hillary Clinton and Mitt Romney look like Mother Teresa.

Thanks for the soap box, Dr. Fly!

Comments »

The Startling Plan Of Black Lives Matter: Will They Succeed?

Tue Nov 1, 2016 9:31pm EST 0

I am going to tell you something that seems so foreign to many of you that you may not believe at first. You may dismiss it as a conspiracy theory — but listen. I know how it looks, I know how it sounds. I wouldn’t believe it myself if I hadn’t come across the facts of the matter. So I encourage you to research the matter and draw your own conclusions.

The shockingly disturbing fact of the matter is that there are white puppeteers behind black lives matter who are working towards the destruction of racial relations. They wish only to promote more racial chaos for their own personal gain.  Their goal is political profiteering and Marxism. They want to preserve their own careers of profiteering off of racial chaos.

In other words, black lives don’t matter to “Black Lives Matter”. At least not to the white leaders behind the dark shadows on the top of the organization. That’s why the leftists–or more specifically the white anarchist-marxists–are using blacks like soldiers on the front lines, hoping they are killed by cops so they become martyrs.

If you are well read, you probably know all about the racist profiteer Shaun King – the white person who cheated another black person out of a scholarship by claiming to be black so he could qualify instead under affirmative action laws instead of whomever was next in line… The person who somehow became one of the pro Marxist “leaders” of BLM… at least as much as he could after others in the movement realized he was a fraud.

But you may not know about the role of white leftist intellectuals like Lisa Fithian and terrorist Bill Ayers the community organizing Saul Alinsky tactician in regards to black lives matter. You may not know about the connections of the slimy tentacles of political activist financier George Soros dangling money in front of the money whores who dance like puppets and sell their souls for their puppetmaster’s money.

BLM groups have also joined with the Communist Party USA, the Committees of Correspondence for Democracy and Socialism, Democratic Socialists of America, SEIU, Color of Change, and many other unions and organizations with ties to George Soros money, and Mr. Soros has donated millions to the “cause” and growing, including paying Lisa Fithian to train blacks to “create crisis”.

To them, putting blacks in harms way and teaching other black leaders tactics (allegedly for “peaceful protest” tactics) that will elicit responses is their way of operating. Teaching blacks to antagonize, provoke, and threaten cops with the intent of trying to get the cops to fire on blacks, all for the sake of crisis politics… is simply their modus operandi.

These disgusting leftists love seeing blacks get shot by cops so they can continue to spread chaos, and use chaos to profit personally and politically.

These Marxists radicals (by their own admissions) don’t care about destruction and cost to the city and damage to other black owned businesses like in North Carolina. In fact, they want the US to burn. Bill Ayers bombed the pentagon. He “gets up everyday thinking today’s the morning he’s going to end capitalism” and considers the US “a terrorist nation who is a threat to world peace”. He is pathologically insane. He once said “The only path to the final defeat of imperialism and the building of socialism is revolutionary war”. Black Lives Matter is simply one of his vehicles. Blacks are merely his pawns to be sacrificed in waging war against the United States.

These Anarchist-Marxists don’t care that in Baltimore that they are crying institutional racism and burning the city down while leaving a black president, black attorney general, black mayor, and majority black police force along with a city with a majority black populous to deal with the consequences of the manufactured crisis. And they certainly don’t care about the crime rate, the rate at which blacks resist arrest and the rate at which blacks kill other blacks. Furthermore, they know that these facts go against their narrative, so they have conditioned people to be “triggered” to think pointing these facts out is “racist”… because without the ability to cast someone else as the enemy, without the ability to divide people by class and race, they have no movement. And without a movement, they wouldn’t have the chaos and hysteria politics that move lobbyists to push for policy, that fund lobbyists, and that create profit opportunities for the elite, for the paid lobbying groups and corporate lawyers as well as their lawfirms, and for those who occasionally also profit as a result of specific policies. Without this movement by which people are willing to pay them to speak, to train, and to create more chaos while pretending to solve the problem, they wouldn’t have their greed inspired purposes, while blaming capitalists for the very greed they are guilty of.

If you really paid attention, this should have been no surprise to you. Anita Moncrief in Andrew Breitbart’s film Occupy Unmasked predicted these same anarchist-Marxists like Lisa Fithian who were involved heavily in “community organizing” (code for creating civil unrest for personal gain) during Occupy Wallstreet would be preparing blacks for what she called the “next stage” at the time. She predicted it would be much more violent than occupy. I don’t have a video clip because of copyright, but I think it’s halfway through the movie.

[[Side tangent: It’s important to understand that a very, very small percentage of blacks are involved in the “black lives matter” movement. They will use a bully tactic to try to silence you for speaking out. They will say the fact you speak out against the movement to try to label you “racist” and discredit you. It’s very unfair to judge an entire race or group of people by how they’re portrayed as on TV, but to black lives matter, they rely on these stereotypes, while blaming those who live out in the country or in mostly white communities who’s primary exposure to black people is what’s on TV. They are baiting the other side. That is what the anarchist-Marxists want. They want you to believe you have to “pick sides” and that if you’re against BLM, you’re “against blacks” while they are the racists. They want you to believe black lives matter and their behavior is representative of minorities so it creates blowback. The more division and blowback, the more their movement grows.]]

Occupy Wallstreet was mostly the dry run done with mostly whites. It was your trust fund babies plus the unknowing college kids (and others of the radical left like Lisa Fithian would organize) that the SEIU would send busses full of people. The people leading the charge would march them off to a bank while banging drums, yelling chants and inciting disorder. They were well aware people would get arrested for trespassing if they entered the bank, and so they would hold the door open for them so the door holders wouldn’t be charged, while the unaware lemmings would be, just so it could make headlines and be seen on tape and increase frustration and attention and chaos.

They would intentionally block bridges with the hope that there would be people getting arrested. If anyone was maced or tazed, “even better” for the left as they get off on the smell of burning flesh electrocuting the air as long as it pushes their narrative. The goal was someone would resist arrest and you could get “police brutality” on tape, and fuel more chaos that they could profit from.

Lisa Fithian once said, “When people ask me, ‘What do you do?’ I say, ‘I create crisis,'” Fithian continued. “Because crisis is the leading edge where change is possible.”

Crisis at the expense of black lives and inducing pain for the purpose of power and influence?

Racist.

Need Organized Crime? “Better Call Saul!”

Lisa Fithian left out the well documented playbook of Saul Alinsky who profited from politics in the outside by largely applying mob tactics to politics.

Hillary met with Saul Alinsky and looked up to him, but her one point of disagreement with him was that’s Saul wanted to profit in the shadows and remain invisible and profit from the outside as a paid “community organizer” that could promise a result and offer plausible deniability. Hillary wanted to influence government from the inside and envisioned doing so. She envisioned greater opportunity from being closer to the government money as well as the lobbying money and underground trade of favors and votes. Her college dissertation was on Saul Alinsky and of course she recognized Bill’s persuasion skills and rode his coat tails to Arkansas governor and later the whitehouse. If you need any proof that she succeeded in profiting from politics just look at her net worth of over $40M when she claims she left the whitehouse in 2000 broke and in debt, while claiming to fight for the impoverished.

But I digress.

Calling Lisa Fithian racist is an understatement as racist is an overused term so let me be clear…
Setting up blacks to be unknowing soldiers on the front lines literally may be as Racist as one can be in modern times without getting arrested, and if you ask me, she should be. If someone can be jailed for manslaughter for taking away stop signs, Lisa Fithian, Bill Ayers (who also bombed the pentagon), and anyone else who intentionally puts blacks in harms way intentionally for profit should at least be in jail for the same crime. Even if there no proven intent to harm, they should be just as guilty.

But when Lisa Fithian talks about creating crisis, to me that signals the desire to create conflict that results in harm. While she may or may not wish for the harm to occur, she does everything to ensure that a breeding ground for harm in the form of chaos is created. So we are not just talking about someone that should be guilty of manslaughter (in my mind). If there was intent on influencing not just people, but specifically black people to lead groups in a provocative way with the hopes of getting them killed then I consider that worse than a hate crime, that’s attempted mass murder AND a hate crime and she and anyone else involved should be publically declared an enemy of the state. At the very least, she should be grilled to answer a lot of questions very publicly.

If a drug dealer (the person who orchestrated the crime) is more guilty than a drug user (the person who facilitated the crime), and a drug lord (the master financier and operator behind several similar operations) is even worse, then I guess that makes Lisa Fithian worse than any crime done on the “frontlines” and slimy George Soros equivalent to public enemy #1 and equivalent to a genocidal regime.

Lisa Fithian was paid money from George Soros (the evil puppeteer) to train blacks “how to protest” with the intention of creating crisis. In other words, he paid for Fithian to create a course on what amounts to “How to get blacks killed for fun and profit.” But is marketed as something more similar to “how to fight for justice”.

Here’s an illustration of what they inspired: (graphic description with actual killing removed)

She taught her kid to fight the cop every second. To not get out of their car without kicking and screaming. She held a shotgun and used her kid as a shield. These are the types of bloodshed inspiring tactics that create chaos. I imagine from witnessing these results as well as repeatedly provocative taunting by members in a mass crowd to a small number of police trying to clear entire major interstates blocked by “Black Lives Matter” that similar tactics are taught to incite a response by one side or another.

These are provocative, threatening tactics that will get people killed: Resist arrest, carry a weapon, get it on camera, reach for the weapon because they’re “going to kill you anyways” and make sure it’s streamed live to Periscope or Facebook. Looks like she went an extra step and announced her intent to resist until death and used her kid as a shield creating a hostage situation that further validated the cops shooting her at the first clean shot they got.

The left pretends to stand on the “moral high ground” while labeling the right “racists” for wanting “law and order”, pointing to policies that seek to reduce crime as “disproportionately hurting minorities” (It also disproportionally helps the innocent minorities, and overall does more good than harm). But the change makers behind the left’s “accomplishments” are the heartless, toxic sewage of society that are literally planning ways to put more potential victims at risk.

Unfortunately in the process of enforcing crime, some people resist arrest and some resists lead to death which makes the George Soros happy because he likes to see the movement he funds grow in size.

My personal policy prescription would be to eliminate the profit center of gangs through decriminalization of marijuana on a nation wide basis and tax it, and eliminating stupid laws that turns the police into the IRS and distracts them from real crimes, while at the same time aggressively enforcing every law left on the book such as vandalism, destruction of property and especially going after crime at the source. I would also run every study possible on how to reduce the crime retention rate and test the results on a small scale and roll out the best results. This might put me at ends with both parties for various reasons, but I think there’s enough common ground to push this, or initially push a more extreme version with the intention of this being the end point of compromise.

Let’s be clear… Some claims of Black Lives Matter are legitimate. The cops that shoot unarmed compliant men or even men running away like in North Carolina with Walter Scott are murderers and should absolutely be tried and put away for murder or given the death penalty (after due process) every time. Period.

But the intentional blurring of the lines and attempting to put Walter Scott in the same category as Michael Brown and to put Michael Slager and Darren Wilson (only Slager committed 1st degree murder) in the same category is despicable. As so is the radical intention of putting blacks in harms way for the “movement” that seeks to bring down USA and dovode everyone on team USA by color, as so is putting a bounty on the head of cops as the black panthers did prior to the Dallas mass shooting of police.

But if we’re calling out the racists, let’s call out George Soros who was one of many financiers of BLM who once expressed no remorse for nazi collaboration during world war 2 and even called it the happiest time of his life. Who’s “culmination of his life’s work” was the financial crisis of 2008. Who financced community organizers involved that have no conscience over getting black people killed and literally sacrificing them for a little extra political influence as the racist filth they are. (Sacrificing them literally by result, not necessarily intent).

Let’s call out Democracy Alliance and their wealthy Democrat donors as well as the Freedom Road Socialist Organization and any other of the white elites who fund these organizations and know full well what they’re doing.

The leftist policy makers don’t want blacks to succeed economically. To be clear, I’m not talking about the voters who are largely unaware of the nefarious things occurring behind the scenes, but the policy makers. That’s because without a large percentage of the black votes democrats don’t win. Studies show that blacks on some form of government assistance are far more likely to vote democrat than those that aren’t. In fact in general, the wealthier you are, the more likely you vote republican. The left’s power depends on Americans being poor, so what incentive do they have to intentionally create massive growth? What incentive do they have to do anything but let the middle class be destroyed, and the wealth shift to the elites through big government corporate socialism?

(There are other graphics that say the same thing that are more updated but are poorly illustrated.)

When a black person dies at the hands of another black, he is a statistic to the left. To the media it’s not a story with reporting or granting emotional empathy. When a black is killed by a cop, it’s good business for white intellectual anarchist liberal-extremists like Lisa Fithian, and good business for big media. Why would any heartless politician or community organizer actually want to do anything about stopping black people from dying when they continue to get blood money from it, and continue to move the country more to the left, and continue to get reelected in the process as a result?

Deplorable, despicable, and unconscionable.

By the way, the big six companies that own virtually all of media also own all of the major record labels and their minor subsidiaries. So glorifying and promoting musicians that sell the thug life and inspire drug use, thug life, criminal behavior and gang warfare are just the marketing side of the democrats blood money inc, and one way to monetize and promote criminal behavior simultaneously. It also serves the purpose of dividing the other side, trying to place all black people in this “category” and portray all blacks as “thugs” or portray them as “super predators” to borrow Hillary’s term.

Fortunately, most people that vote democrat aren’t this bad, they’re just unknowing enablers of the Marxist elite that is progressive and has taken over the majority of the democrat party… This progression is currently progressing on society like a cancerous tumor, while people watch their city burn into the ground while the cry of the racist black lives matter is repeated that “If I die in police custody, burn this shit down”. Indeed they will, and indeed they have. They want a Marxist revolution, and they will use blacks to do it, and will use every form of persuasion possible to convince you that they’re on “your side” in the process while they stab you in the back and laugh gleefully as America chokes on it’s own blood.

The regressive authoritarian left (as opposed to the now marginalized classic liberals and libertarian leaning left) is the greatest threat to America right now, and if the right doesn’t realize what is at stake and sell this narrative, it will be too late to fight any other threat including ISIS. They will take us into WW3 if they have to. Hillary’s own words of a no fly zone in Syria combined with the information from generals is enough proof whether or not you read my post on WWIII and the update.

See The Roots Of Black Lives Matter Unveiled

Also, see this video:

Comments »

No One Gives a Fuck

Sat Oct 29, 2016 11:03am EST 1

skrillex

Hi friends, long time no post, that would be related to my post title and me feeling under the weather.  But we’ve had some things happen with the FBI that may switch some voters minds. (Extra October surprise.)

The important part of anything that comes out about HRC is that nobody cares at all.  I’ll tell you, these days like 25% of the country is full leftist and not even ashamed of it.  So when something that is literally criminal comes out about their communist messiah, they just ignore it.  I’ve had a conversation with one such leftist about how they don’t want to vote for Trump because he’s rough around the edges (sic) but will gladly vote for Hillary because she will help refugees (which she helped create.) I wanna tell this person what the actual fuck, but we are on cordial terms.

BUT WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK?!

These people don’t give any fucks about anything related to helping the country, they absorb the globalist bullshit and parrot it back as if it is gospel.  Thank goodness zeropointenergy guy is blogging and helping show that not everybody who could be is a commie.  If this election is lost though, it will be because people would rather pretend to care about random bullshit than actually care about anything related to helping the country, the economy, or their fellow Americans.

Comments »

Hillary Wants WW3 – Update

Thu Oct 27, 2016 3:42pm EST 1

↑tac-9hillary-nuke

As a follow up to The Russian Election War, I came across a video that draws attention to the fact that Hillary wants a no fly zone in Syria. According to experts that would lead to WWIII, kill a lot of Syrians and require over 100,000 troops.

Skip to somewhere around the 8 minute mark

hillary-goldman-sachs-ground-breaking-1024x583

Wonderful.

img_1128 img_1129 img_1130

 

Comments »

Vote Rauner, Not Blagojevich

Mon Oct 24, 2016 3:14pm EST 2

Born and raised in Illinois, I feel as if I am in a time machine into the future.  You see, Illinois right now is what is going to happen to the United States in the next few decades. Illinois has not been able to curb spending or cut debt at all, just like what will happen in the United States barring major changes. (The outcomes will be different: Illinois will probably default in spite of the lack of current legality while the United States could enter a period of hyperinflation if the debt isn’t cancelled through an act of congress.)

I am here to tell you though, to vote for Trump instead of Hillary.  Vote for Trump because you’re not a complete asshole who would rather accept destroying the country instead of the chance that uncertainty short-term is better than long-term certain doom.

Illinois has had its share of clowns in office.  For the most part, these people have been corrupt clowns, a la Hillary Clinton.  Most recently, a successful businessman came in to try to use his success in running a company to run a state, sound familiar?  The thing is, Rauner was able to enact some legislation to fix the states bloated pension budget/underfunding.  The problem is the state supreme court denied the ability of the administration to cut pension benefits due to the state constitution, whatever.  The point is he tried and was able to fight tooth and nail for it until the very end.

The other side of Illinois politics is runaway corruption at almost all levels.  Similarly to how lobbying is strangling congress in any attempt to pass any practical bill.  Even Obamacare turned out to be a written by insurers to save their ass kinda bill.  I am here to tell you #imwithherers that corruption is only alright if things get done.  Being part of the lobbying class with a congress that’s basically deadlocked means that your hopes of anything passing but more pork-barrel spending are pipedreams under Clinton.  And again, I can tell you as a “proud” Illinoisan that if you vote for anybody you’ll get some corruption.  The problem is people have already seen Hillary’s myriad ineptitudes in the public eye and we know that her kind of corruption doesn’t get things done and will only destroy the economy for the (upper) middle class and lower in her (presumed) eight years in office.

So to frog, vii, etc. vote Trump, not for the reason that the chance of things getting done with Trump are low, but for the reason that the chances of anything helpful for the country being done under Clinton are zero.

 

Comments »

© Copyright 2007-2024 iBankCoin All rights reserved under penalty of bodily harm. DISCLAIMER: This is a personal web site, reflecting the opinions of its author(s). It is not a production of my employer, and it is unaffiliated with any FINRA broker/dealer. Statements on this site do not represent the views or policies of anyone other than myself. The information on this site is provided for discussion purposes only, and are not investing recommendations. Under no circumstances does this information represent a recommendation to buy or sell securities. DATA INFORMATION IS PROVIDED TO THE USERS "AS IS." NEITHER iBankCoin, NOR ITS AFFILIATES, NOR ANY THIRD PARTY DATA PROVIDER MAKE ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND REGARDING THE DATA INFORMATION, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE. Privacy Policy