iBankCoin
Joined Jan 1, 1970
509 Blog Posts

Hocus Pocus

I found the following interesting since it has been developed by Welles Wilder, the same Welles Wilder that gave us “RSI” and “Directional Movement” for technical analysis…..

The Delta Phenomenon

It is based on the cycles of the moon and the interaction with the earth and sun.

Anyone familiar with this stuff?

(I’m not putting a plug in for this…just curious if someone else has come across this or even uses it)

 

Comments »

Determining Price Objectives Using Point and Figure Charting

For those unfamiliar with Point and Figure Charting, you can read up on the basics from some of my previous posts, Intro, Part I, Part II.

Wierdo Jay has asked if I would go over how price targets are determined.

When using PnF charts, you determine price targets (or objectives) using two methods called the “vertical count” and the “horizontal count”.

A little more background on the “counts” and the theory behind them:

The methods come from analogies drawn from the science of ballistics (if you’re an anti-gun lobbyist, you might want to skip this section).

The distance a bullet travels when shot from a gun is dependent on five factors:

1. The amount of pressure generated by the powder or gas in the gun chamber

2. The length of the gun barrel

3. The amount of resistance the bullet encounters through the bore before it leaves the barrel

4. The air temperature and resistance

5. The angle of the barrel relative to a horizontal plane, i.e. the influence of gravity

It is these same principles that Point and Figure applies to stock and commodity trading to arrive at a rough estimate of a price objective following a breakout from a consolidation area.

The vertical count is the most reliable and is what I use primarily.

Before I get into that subject, let me state that in addition to the count, one should also rely on other forms of technical analysis and use them in conjuction with Point and Figure. Also, just because a stock hits a bullish price target, doesn’t mean you automatically sell it. You have to look at things like relative strength and the trend as well in your decision whether or not to sell (or even add to the position).

The Vertical Count

Even though PnF charts produced on sources like www.stockcharts.com already have the price objectives shown, it is still helpful to understand the theory behind how those price objectives are arrived at.

When a stock bottoms out and starts to move up, it will give a simple buy signal at some point. The buy signal is when the column of X’s is higher than the previous column of X’s.

FLIR, currently trading around $40, broke a double top when it moved up to $34 in April. At that point, the bullish price objective was $55.

The bullish price objective is now $73 with the stock trading at $40.

How were those numbers that arrived at?

Look at the column of X’s that preceded the last column of X’s furthest to the right. FLIR got to $33 before reversing into a column of O’s (suppy came back in). Then it went all the way down to $24 before reversing up again. This reversal set up the buy signal when the stock broke $33 (the double top).

The price objective is determined by counting the number of boxes in the last column of X’s and multiplying that number by three (because I’m using the three box reversal system). Then multiply that figure by the value per box. Add that result to the bottom of the line of X’s (where the column began) and you arrive at a price objective.

So, when FLIR moved to $34, it gave a buy signal, initiating the breakout from the double top. Once it hit $34, the price objective was calculated as follows:

Number of X’s in last column: 10

Price objective = (10 x 3 x $1/box) + $25 = $55

At that point, would I take the trade?

Having an idea of a potential price objective is essential in determining whether to act on a buy signal or not. I typically want to have at least a 2:1 ratio of reward to risk. That is, for every dollar of risk I take on, I want the potential to make at least two dollars of profit, or the trade is not worth it, in my mind.

So, depending on where I set my stop loss point, I can get an idea of the downside. Using the PnF “count” helps me determine the upside potential. Now I have an idea of the reward to risk ratio.

Judging from the chart, if I had looked at this trade, I would probably have set my stop at $28. So downside is $6. Upside from $34 is 21 points. That’s at 3.5 : 1 ratio, so I would have taken the trade.

(Note: there is no overhead resistance that has been established on FLIR. It is in new uncharted territory.)

If I had set my stop at $22, just below support, which is $23, now my ratio is $21 : $12 = 1.75: 1. It’s close, but I would wait for a pullback to $31 before buying. If that was the case, I would have missed the trade because it only pulled back to $32.50 before breaking out above $34 again.

Today, the stock is trading around $40. The price objective is $73:

Number of boxes in last column: 16

Price objective = [16 x 3 x 1] + 25 = $73

Upside: $33

Downside: $10 (I would set the stop at $30…good support at $31 – $32)

Reward to risk : 3.3 : 1

This is still a good trade at these levels.

Finally, price objectives are not set in stone. They can change depending on the pattern and price of the stock over time. But, they do give you a framework on which to analyze a potential trade.

If you’re shorting a stock, the methodology is just the opposite. I can give an example of that in a future post, if anyone would like to see it.

Using Point and Figure charting is not about picking tops and bottoms. It’s about buying (or selling) based on trends in supply and demand. This can be an additional tool for trend followers.

Disclaimer: This information is not intended to be used as the primary basis of investment decisions. Because of individual investors requirements, it should not be construed as advice designed to meet the particular investment needs of any investor. Consult your financial advisor prior to taking any actions. The information and opinions contained here are those of the author and are not necessarily the same as those of iBankCoin, its principals or its affiliates. The author may have a position in one or more stocks mentioned here. Trade at your own risk.

Comments »

Leveraged Inverse ETFs: Technical Update

For those of you who like juggling diamondback rattlesnakes, I give you leveraged inverse ETFs. Here are the current buys.

Buy. Bullish low pole reversal pattern. Resistance at 57.

————————————————————–

Buy. Broke a double top. Resistance at 126. Target objective is 132.

—————————————————————

Bullish pattern developing. OK to Buy here. Downtrend reversed, but still vulnerable to downside. A move to above 34 initiates a double top breakout. Resistance at 41.

————————————————————–

Buy. Bullish low pole reversal pattern. A move to 36 initiates a double top breakout. Resistance at 44.

————————————————————–

Buy. Double top breakout. Target price is 71. Near term resistance at 61.

————————————————————–

This is a Buy. Double top breakout confirmed last Friday. Price objective is 91. Heavy near term resistance from 81 – 83. Corroborates the analysis by The Fly’s chart chomping fool.

—————————————————————

Disclaimer: This information is not intended to be used as the primary basis of investment decisions. Because of individual investors requirements, it should not be construed as advice designed to meet the particular investment needs of any investor. Consult your financial advisor prior to taking any actions. The information and opinions contained here are those of the author and are not necessarily the same as those of iBankCoin, its principals or its affiliates. The author may have a position in one or more stocks mentioned here. Trade at your own risk.

Comments »

Sector ETFs: Weekly Technical Update 05/27/08

Consumer Staples [[XLP]]: $28.08 Neutral. Reversed its downtrend this past month since a near term low in March. However, still consolidating. Bullish breakout at $30.

Consumer Discretionary [[XLY]]: $31.70 Neutral. Consolidating. A break down to $30 would reverse the current short term uptrend. Resistance is still at 34.

Energy [[XLE]]: $86.26 Neutral (down from Bullish last week). Reversal of a double top breakout early last week. Supply coming back in. The fact that this leading sector has weakened is not a good sign for the overall market, given the rise in crude oil prices. This is the sector to key off of.

Financials [[XLF]]: $24.65: Bearish pattern, consolidating. Strong resistance to the upside in this trading range now at $29 (down from $30).  A move to 30 would initiate a double top breakout pattern, but still a long ways off. Support at 24. Continue to look for short ideas in this sector, or stay away.

Health Care [[XLV]]: $31.35 Bearish. Double bottom breakdown pattern. Continues its losing ways. Support is at 30. A break below could eventually take it down to 23. Good sector to continue to look for short ideas.

Industrials [[XLI]]: $37.79 Bullish, but weak. Bullish Low Pole Reversal PnF chart pattern.  A move to 42 would initiate a spread triple top breakout. 

Materials [[XLB]]: $43.87 Bullish, but weakening. Double top breakout pattern still valid. Has broken out to new highs after long period of consolidation from 39 – 42. Strong support still at 40 – 41.

Tech [[XLK]]: $24.48 Neutral, slightly bullish. Consolidating. A move to 28 sets up a potential bullish breakout. This is a sector that continues to show development as it consolidates toward the long side. Strong support at 20 – 21.

Utilities [[XLU]]: $40.91 Bullish. Maintaining its bullish posture since breaking out in April from a double top, after consolidating. Strong support at 39.  

Telecom [[IYZ]]: $25.97 Neutral. A fairly bullish pattern has been developing in this sector. One to keep an eye on.

Overall, the Market is looking like it could continue to roll over. We should get an indication of a sustainable downturn this week. Short term traders may want to continue to play the market to the downside.

Disclaimer: This information is not intended to be used as the primary basis of investment decisions.  Because of individual investors requirements, it should not be construed as advice designed to meet the particular investment needs of any investor. Consult your financial advisor prior to taking any actions. The information and opinions contained here are those of the author and are not necessarily the same as those of iBankCoin, its principals or its affiliates. The author may have a position in one or more stocks mentioned here. Trade at your own risk.

Comments »

U.S. National SWAT Championships

I’m enjoying my time in CO for a family reunion, and watching family and friends compete.

Have a safe holiday weekend and remember Memorial Day. Honor those who have made the ultimate sacrifice. Back on Tuesday.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XJNpKrd0wK8

Comments »