iBankCoin
Joined Jan 1, 1970
1,010 Blog Posts

…and a List of 2010 Predictions

As I sit here, enjoying the arils of a pomegranate and English tea brewed from loose leaf, I stare outward, despite all my energy peering within, lost somewhere behind vision but before dreaming.  It is here that we attempt to perceive what is coming in the future.

So I lay out for you now, my predictions for the next year.  Undoubtedly, they will change dramatically, as my predictions for this year have.  However, it is important that we work from some foundation.

There are many way to create predictions.  The majority on this site use technicals; predict the future from the past.  Some of you use fundamentals; all things must stay within their boundaries.  For judgment of stock picks, I tend to rely on functionality.  A system is bound by fundamentals, but its behavior within them is very much a relationship which, with experience and cleverness, can be reasoned out.  The probable, outward price valuation of any security is a distribution dependent on its components and their actions.

However, for anticipating the developments of a country in what is so frequently an irrational world, or for issues which cannot be reliably understood through math, there is a far simpler mechanism I employ; one which, sadly, has fallen from the grace of men long ago.

That is the consideration of objectivity.

Firstly, the Fed will not raise rates for at least another four months.  It is coming to winter, and, despite this sudden warm front we’re experiencing, at least where I am, it will still be a particularly cold one.  Raising rates would be a kiss of death to struggling families still holding onto the edge, correspondingly increasing their payments which are already being met only with much difficulty.

However, the Fed chairmen are not fools; they see the world besmirching the dollar and know full well that possessing the reserve currency is our most powerful distinction.  They will attempt to correct our path, likely in late March or early April, perhaps on the back of a report announcing an increase in jobs, by raising rates.  Real estate will suffer accordingly, maybe dragging the market into a slow, gradual retracement.

Bankruptcy filings will increase unexpectedly after Christmas.  Exhibit some empathy and ask yourself: you’re the struggling head of a household who can’t keep making payments on a house that’s underwater.  You have an untenable debt load.  Do you file for bankruptcy now?  Of course not, it’s the holiday season and low federal lending rates coupled with recently passed legislature have enabled you to finance your debt.  You can’t make headway on it, but you can just sort of coast onward.

You perhaps have a family, who you want to see happy, if even for a fleeting period of time.  So you go on one last spree to buy them some festive cheer and save the tough decision for after January 1.  I expect bankruptcy filings will appear diminished over the next two months, and will then creep back up in a small rush after the holidays.  Credit card companies and banks will get hit in the first month of 2010.

Healthcare will be passed, if not by year end then the beginning of 2010.  It will not contain a public option, but will cost more than $1 trillion, to be determined by the ages and not us here today.  Social Security and Medicare/Medicaid will be addressed next year, but I don’t pretend to guess whether they will be balanced for any permanent interval (greater than one or two years).

Next summer, leaders of foreign nations will band together and create a new standard for purchasing oil; talk suggests it will likely be backed by a basket of currencies.  Even if our currency appears to be rebounding, this will still likely happen.  It is a matter of principle that foreign nations do not wish to suffer having the United States holding our currency over their heads.  If our misstep can create a world wide financial crisis, can you imaging what our intentions could accomplish?  They will not risk a weaponized, nuclear, U.S. dollar in negotiations on America’s global policy.

Democrats will lose big in the November mid-term elections, with Republicans taking back the House.  I don’t know if they will also regain the Senate.  However, Republicans will prove most providential in local elections, gaining vast control of small offices.  Despite this large change, the election will still be associated with words like, “close”, “insufferable”, “aggravating” and, shortly thereafter, “pointless.”  Obamacare will not be rescinded.

Sometime next year, it will be announced that we have made it out of the recovery.  Employment will be forced below the ten percent point, if only through strategic manipulation of government data.

If you enjoy the content at iBankCoin, please follow us on Twitter

14 comments

  1. Dr Fly

    What sort of English tea? Of the Earl Grey variety, perhaps?

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
    • Mr. Cain Thaler

      I do enjoy Earl Grey, but this is English Breakfast. I also like Darjeeling.

      • 0
      • 0
      • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  2. JakeGint

    Loose leaf.

    It’s wrriting paper.

    __________

    Obamacare goes down in close voting, saving many Senate seats.

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
    • Mr. Cain Thaler

      Haha, in this usage, loose leaf implies the tea is not packaged or brewed in a bag.

      Is that a counter bet, that the Senate will stave off Obamacare? I’ll take it, for bragging rights.

      • 0
      • 0
      • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
      • JakeGint

        It’s more of a hope for American sanity to break through.

        We had our Congress critter before our local ACG group this morning, talking about how we needed “competition” but that ultimately he thought “single payor the only way to go.”

        Boggling that he would attempt such stupidity in front of a bunch of deal sharks… the hubris is staggering as he explained how most of his constituents “could never understand….!”

        _______

        • 0
        • 0
        • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
        • Mr. Cain Thaler

          Disgusting, isn’t it? My entire employer could be upended by a single misconception and the stroke of a pen.

          Right now, I’m vindictive to the point of wishing global famine. Let’s just start over.

          • 0
          • 0
          • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  3. Dubz

    Great updates, sire.

    I enjoy reading your work immensely.

    That is all,

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  4. sailorboy

    Dude, you had me until “objectivity.” Maybe I am biased from historical interactions with Ayn Randians, but public objectivists, in my experience, are pure fucking wackos. I prefer the folks who read Atlas Shrugged a few times and say “Yeah, there is some really good shit in there.”

    And then there is your previous post. You lay out the casual MGM investment case on a gambling company whose defaulted loan is not even mentioned. As of Sep 30, improved cash flow is irrelevant. I dare you to tell me CDS mongers are not in full court press mode right now. One day soon you will wake up to a press release discussing recovery at 20c/$1 debt. I see 40% downside from today’s stock price after short covering is complete. I call that trading with stops.

    This is not even close to a medium term investment, let alone long term. When I trade I take technical analysis over this shit anyday. King indeed.

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
    • Mr. Cain Thaler

      Why are you rambling on about Ayn Rand? Where in my post did I bring up a book? Rand’s theory of objectivity and my setting up predictions based on the objectives of prominent sections of society are only related in that both contain the root word, “objective”, so maybe instead of jumping to conclusions, you should work on reading comprehension.

      Second, I am not aware that MGM has defaulted on a loan. They have come close, but they have not yet defaulted. Moreover, they are presently sitting on just under $1 billion in cash and cash equivilants, and have restructured their credit lending with an amendment to raise $500 million more. Thus, the odds of them defaulting in the next year, despite daunting levels of debt, is slim to none.

      Third, they are a very risky investment (I calculate the actual worth of the shares to be somewhere around $.60), but I have little exposure to risk in my portfolio outside of GKK, so I have elected to make this purchase. You’ll note, I have not suggested anyone else does. Anyone blindly following my lead would be an idiot. What else do you want from me? I could put a huge fucking danger sign in my post somewhere perhaps? Key ominous music in the background? Quit being a drama queen.

      Fourth, there is an enormous short stake in the company, and any sign of recovery will force massing covering.

      And, finally, I would point out that short term trades in technical analysis have risks of there own. By making quick maneuvers you are holding and measuring your wealth in constant terms of the dollar. The dollar is presently keyed to lose enormous amounts of value. I think you’d be surprised to find my net portfolio (of which MGM will be a part) is far safer than your banking account.

      • 0
      • 0
      • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
    • Mr. Cain Thaler

      I also just realized, if you make a time line, you’ll notice when you posted this comment I wasn’t even holding the name. I sold back out after the large move up it had and am waiting to buy back in below $10.

      • 0
      • 0
      • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"