iBankCoin
Joined Nov 11, 2007
1,458 Blog Posts

Power Dip Performance at 2% Risk

Here are some good articles on percent-risk position sizing:

The Percent Risk Model: Size Does Matter

Position Sizing

The results below show the performance of the Power Dip system risking 2% of account value on each trade (all previous tests have used 1% risk), with a maximum of 5 position held at one time. All other parameters from previous tests remain the same: .01/share commissions, 10% stops, opened at the open and closed at the close.

pd-backtest-results-1_1_1990-to-11_23_09-2-percent-risk

The system grows capital to such a large amount that near the end of the test period, it would be buying positions so large that it would move the market. The point is that doubling risk nearly doubles performance.

2-percent-equity-curve

More needs to be explained about using percent risk position sizing, but this will have to suffice for now. Feel free to ask questions in the comments section.

If you enjoy the content at iBankCoin, please follow us on Twitter

18 comments

  1. blink

    Very nice. Do you have logarithmic version of the chart above?

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
    • Woodshedder

      Sure do blink. I was going to put it in the post, but it was very late. I’ll update the post tonight with the log chart.

      • 0
      • 0
      • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  2. Michael

    Thanks, Wood – makes more sense now. So you keep the same stop but halve the number of positions held at once and double the size of each.

    Why have you chosen to go with the 10-positions-1%-risk model instead so far? Just for peace of mind?

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
    • Woodshedder

      Michael exactly. Psychologically, 1% is better for me. I am less likely to skip a trade or do something stupid with 1% risk as I basically okay with losing that amount of money. However, I am considering switching over to 2% and trying it out to see how it feels.

      • 0
      • 0
      • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  3. TA

    That’s some graph, definitely getting into the ‘too good to be true’ catagory
    That said 2% per trade doesn’t sounds like that big a deal

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  4. Swinging for the Fences
    Swinging for the Fences

    Hey Wood – have you tried varying the timeframe? 5 years, 10 years?

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  5. Newt

    Although a max. trade loss of 92 million may sound a bit hurtful, the overall results are quite astounding really. Thanks for all the hard work.

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
    • Woodshedder

      No problem. Obviously, as noted in the post, you wouldn’t be able to replicate the results as you’d be moving the market. IMO, I would probably quit once I had amassed, say, 100 million, lol

      • 0
      • 0
      • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  6. John Q Public

    Shut up, power dipshit.

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  7. Hammy

    how can someone with sub-6 figure account use this system effectively? i’m looking at this from the viewpoint of being affected by commissions.

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  8. Tilo

    Hey Wood,

    Have you stopped publishing PD selection or have you not had any this week? Just wondering.

    Best

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
    • Woodshedder

      Hi Tilo, been traveling.
      NLST has been the only power dip buy over the last three days. It has just been selling off each day, but still meeting the criteria. I got stopped out of it early last week.

      I am going to post a final roundup of the PD trades I’ve tracked, but after that, I will no longer be publishing the picks.

      • 0
      • 0
      • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
      • Tilo

        Thanks, Wood. I was just wondering if it was market conditions or something else.

        When will the subscription site be launched?

        • 0
        • 0
        • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
        • Woodshedder

          The lack of trades over the last 3 trades is due primarily to market conditions. The market has been in a neutral to overbought range and therefore the system has been closing trades, for the most part, rather than opening new ones.

          We start testing out email alerts and the payment gateway tomorrow. Assuming they work as they should, not much longer!

          • 0
          • 0
          • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  9. Hammy

    you guys are considering offering an active duty discount, right?

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"