iBankCoin
Full-time stock trader. Follow me here and on 12631
Joined Apr 1, 2010
8,861 Blog Posts

Stop Throwing Your Cards at the Dealer

At the end of the day, all we are doing in the stock market is wagering money on outcomes that have yet to be determined. If you insist on spending your time coming up with condescending, pre-packaged responses about how trading is categorically not gambling, then you are already battling demons that will eventually come home to roost. Trading is most certainly gambling, and so is investing for that matter. Even if you buy a stock for a dividend in lieu of capital appreciation as a long-term investor, you are gambling that the dividend is safe. I invite you to take a look back at history at how many firms cut or completely erased their dividend back in 2008, to illustrate just how much of a risk it is, even when it seems like the safest thing in the world.

Given that we are gamblers, it is especially illuminating in a market like the current one to see how traders react to adversity. Look at your local Twitter stream, and you will see traders trying to fade other traders simply because they dislike them. You will see others arguing against straw men, creating their own twisted reality where “everyone” expects a 2008 crash, so therefore they are bullish. Alternatively, you will see other traders arguing “everyone’ is bullish, so therefore they will press their shorts here (albeit with the wind at their backs). Of course, when “everyone” is fading “everyone” else, you really do not have the type of contrarian evidence that you look for at inflection points. Instead, you have noise upon noise.

In a market like this, you also see raw emotions come out. When the market is trending higher in a low volatility environment, it is very easy for traders to act like one big, happy family, save the few outcasts who short the uptrend all the way to the top. However, once the tide turns and volatility returns in a corrective market, most traders get bit–The only question is how much. If you take a lump early on in the correction/bear market, there is nothing wrong with cutting your losses and retreating to a highly defensive posture via cash for the duration of the volatility. For those who continue to trade these markets in an active manner, unless you have a specific game plan you are bound to lose control of your emotions. You simply cannot afford to lose your head. Imagine sitting at a poker table in person with nine of the traders you despise the most from social media. Imagine them getting lucky and winning a hand of poker against you, and seeing them smirk as they drag in your money and count it. How are you going to react? Will you throw your cards at the dealer? Will your berate the jerk who won your money and got lucky?

The first thing to remember is that you are here to make money without exposing your capital to undue risk. So, you should ask yourself whether you truly are, in fact, getting unlucky in the current market. If you honestly believe luck has nothing to do with it, and you are simply not adept to this type of a stock market, then there is absolutely nothing wrong with getting up from the table, walking away, and coming back later when the game conditions (stock market conditions) have changed. The next thing to consider is, supposing you are truly getting unlucky in this market, then will emotionally reacting by cherry picking a trader you dislike or think is weak to use as a contrarian indicator be an effective strategy? I view this type of a reaction as being the poker equivalent of throwing your cards at the dealer for losing a tough hand.

In the current market, we have seen unrelenting selling in many of the industrials, energy, materials, and financials. Indeed, that can be described as forced selling and capitulatory. I can certainly envision a bounce sometime soon, but it is likely to be much more of a function of exhausted selling than of “everyone” leaning bearish. In other words, since many traders appear to be focused on making bets based on sentiment, I am getting up and walking away from the sentiment game altogether, focusing now more than ever on price. Because when “everyone” tries to fade everyone else, you are left with an amorphous quagmire that is nothing more than a sucker’s bet.

 

Email this to someonePrint this page
If you enjoy the content at iBankCoin, please follow us on Twitter

18 comments

  1. FIG

    Plan on buying NFLX tomorrow. That stock has been beaten into submission and is due for a nice 10-20% pop.

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  2. Adam Grimes

    Excellent post. Well said.

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  3. Jason

    i think NFLX has one more shakeout.

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  4. Mad_Scientist

    Well said. Price is everything, indeed.

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  5. DJMarcus

    nice post

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  6. M. Edward (Ed) Borasky

    Well said! And of course, since you’ve introduced the “G-word”, you might as well finish the thought.

    1. If you don’t have an edge – an expectation of positive returns – don’t trade.
    2. If you don’t know what your edge is, you don’t have one.
    3. Learn money management / position sizing.

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  7. Hawaiifive0

    Sound advice as always!

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  8. EvanBFI

    God, I love these “Twitter Stream” rants you’ve been doing recently; they really hit home for me. I can’t even go on StockTwits anymore — full of paper-trading amateurs making bold calls every 15 sceonds, then saying “I TOLD YOU SO” the 10% of the time they’re right.

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  9. Mr. Cain Thaler

    Props for “amorphous quaqmire.”

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  10. drveen

    I’ve had this come up conversationally, and with respect to some business propositions lately… so I’ve had to formulate my own “What is the difference, if any, between financial trading and gambling?”

    I propose that the difference is, generally, that in trading one has the possibility of hedging – in gambling, that is quite rare, or
    not very meaningful (betting on black and red at the same time in roulette?)

    Its not a perfect rule, as my horse-betting friends could say, but I think its a good starting point for consideration.

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  11. David Merkel

    Sorry, long-term investing is not gambling. We follow businesslike principles in evaluating the allocation of capital. Value investors outpace the market by 2%/year on average. We do it by careful security and industry selection.

    This is not gambling; this is a business.

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
    • chessnwine

      You’re probably the type of guy who rode FCX from $120 to $15 in 2008 claiming it was “cheap” the whole way day.

      • 0
      • 0
      • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"