iBankCoin
Home / thewife (page 3)

thewife

Can’t Rape This


I am honored once again to be bestowed with this reign as King of The Peanut Gallery. I thank you all for your many comments and votes on my posts made last week. I am rather excited to know that the area I enjoy writing about most is actually what you are interested in reading. And so I will dedicate my time here this month to Trading Psychology.

I actually had another post ready but have decided instead to address today’s tape first and the various reactions that traders may have to it.

I have remembered how to play defense. Thank goodness! And so I managed to avoid getting raped in today’s tape.

I chat with several traders during the day and I am intrigued by the actions or inactions that we see on a day like today.
It seemed at first that the bulls were holding a strong defense even in light of a) the inability of Congress to raise the debt ceiling and b) poor jobs numbers. But alas the tape bid its bulls farewell as it decidedly slipped through multiple support levels, completely negating the breakout $SPX seemed to want only a day earlier. My guess is that the bottom of the channel will lend significant support at 1300 tomorrow, but if this doesn’t hold, look out below. http://twitpic.com/55l837/full

Anyone who knows me, knows that it takes a lot for me to take a bearish stance, so when I get negative, there is likely a reason or three.

Until the debt ceiling is raised, all bets are off and it seems very likely to me that this scenario could play out. Watching $SPX sell off, you would think that smart traders would drop any weak positions pending confirmation of a strong correction, but not all traders were on board with this idea today.

As the day played out, I suggested that it was a good idea to not only respect stop losses very strictly but also to take profits on winners that were showing weakness and I am rather proud of myself for adhering to this discipline. I dropped all but my strongest positions which included taking profits in some that were dropping such as $CBS. Rather than staying in just because it was still in a winning position; I chose to sell it before it became a losing position even though it was still well above my stop loss.

On a side note, stocks that maintain strength in light of the selloff are winners and the only logical ones to hold onto.

But I saw traders who allowed their positions to continue lower and lower while never selling out. It is very easy to justify a losing position when those pesky emotions step in the way. Our ego tells us that we must be right and this causes yet another psychological trader downfall – stubbornness.

In overcoming stubbornness as traders, we must be able to accept losses. We must come into every trade knowing that it can be a loser even if we have the highest probability thesis on our side. If we come into each and every trade accepting that it might not work, it can help us accept the loss and drop the losing trade while we still have our heads above water. While we can certainly set rules for stop losses and be disciplined about sticking to them, it can be harder to give up on a winning position that begins breaking down if we have not raised our stop loss.

In recent months, I had a few trades go horrifyingly wrong on me because I did not sell them when they broke down. Winners turned into losers. If I questioned a position initiated by “thebill”, I was assured that it was still ok, justified by moving the trend-lines lower than originally drawn. When I questioned this, he told me I was too hung up on trend-lines. I realize now that out of stubbornness he was changing his original thesis based on those original trend-lines. Fortunately, for today at least, I seem to have learned my lesson.

Comments »

Que Sera, Sera or The Wife’s Final Word

  
When I was just a little girl, I asked my Mother what will I be? Will I be pretty? Will I be rich? Here’s what she said to me
  
 Que Sera, Sera…Whatever will be, will be. The future’s not ours to see…Que Sera, Sera…..
  
  
On my final day as King of The Peanut Gallery, I would like to share with you some knowledge that I have gained as a student of those who have gone before me, as a technical trader in 12631, as a fundamental investor and one who has learned to respect price action. I thank you all for voting me into this honor able spot and I bid you farewell like a babbling brook. I hope that you get something out of this and are not too bored before you get to the end. 
 
 From the book Psychology of the Stock Market, by George Charles Selden. 
 

1 – Your main purpose must be to keep the mind clear and well balanced. Hence, do not act hastily on apparently sensational information; do not trade so heavily as to become anxious; and do not permit yourself to be influenced by your position in the market.          

2 – Act on your own judgment, or else act absolutely and entirely on the judgment of another, regardless of your own opinion. “Too many cooks spoil the broth.”          

3 – When in doubt, keep out of the market. Delays cost less than losses.          

4 – Endeavor to catch the trend of sentiment. Even if this should be temporarily against fundamental conditions, it is nevertheless unprofitable to oppose it.          

5 – The greatest fault of ninety-nine out of one hundred active traders is being bullish at high prices and bearish at low prices. Therefore, refuse to follow the market beyond what you consider a reasonable climax, no matter how large the possible profits that you may appear to be losing by inaction.          

    
These words, his personal summary of the ideas he tries to espouse, are rules to live by for any active trader. Written by Selden in 1912, his book is amazingly accurate in describing the sentiment of today’s market and every market for the last century.
  
Believe it or not, the market has not changed in these one-hundred years because we the people have not changed. We would like to believe that we have evolved with all our new technology; that trading and investing today is unique to any time in history, but this is merely delusional. We are emotional beings reacting with the same fear of winning or losing and the enthusiasm for knowing our business; both these emotions hinder our ability to be objective with regards to Mr. Market. 
  
In these last few years that I have been trading actively, I have heard many seasoned traders talk of this being a normal or abnormal market. I have heard traders say that this it is not right that we should not be able to profit more than 3%-5% on a trade and I have heard traders say that it is not right when we are able to profit more that 3%-5% on a trade, but in actuality, this is all normal. The market finds a point where it will rise when it can no longer sell off until it reaches the point where it should rise no further. At this time, it continues to rise in small increments, what we call the chop for a few days or more until it finally turns to the downside. The trader who says, “finally a normal market” is just as naïve as the trader who asks, “what happened to our normal market?” – for both conditions exist, have always existed and will always exist.  
  
The same holds true for the inverse, as the market will sell off to the point where it should sell off no further based on fundamental analysis, but it will continue down in a chop just as it did at the market top. There are, and always have been, traders who take advantage of each moment in the cycle because this is what they have determined is the way to best make a profit and they scoff at those who profit during a different time in the cycle. There are those who like to take profits early and those who like to let it ride and both sides believe that the other is foolish. One side believes the other takes too much risk, while the other side believes the one to be careless and unable to take full advantage of the possibility of profit.   
  
Today we separate the value investor from the chartist. The two sides generally despise each other openly, claiming that the other is unrealistic and is not trading with best odds, yet both sides make the same mistake led by those pesky emotions.    
  
As I read Selden’s book over the weekend, written a century ago, I was amazed at how traders, investors and speculators had the same sentiment then, as we do now. Most professional and successful traders fall into the same traps that Selden speaks of. We have all seen the various sides that the pros on IBC have taken with regards to the market. We have our bears who are relentless in their resolve regardless of what the market is actually doing; the market is overbought they say. Certainly it cannot go higher and when it does they whine for it is wrong and has been manipulated to defy its fundamental course.     
  
We have our bulls who are just as stubborn and all the while using the same excuses, making the same mistakes that traders have always used and made.      
  
The market is manipulated, we say, the bearded clam has made it so with his POMO. It will go higher! We are at our most bullish because the market has risen to our expectations, why should it stop now. We expect it to continue amid the chop which we are sure will become a blow off top…and we say this as if we have never heard this before…as if no trader or analyst in time ever considered that the market was being manipulated. But traders have always accused the market of manipulation as Selden clearly points out, whenever prices don’t go as the speculator has determined they should, say if a ticker “looks strong, has encouraging news and they hope for large profits….if prices decline, they charge it to ‘manipulation,’ ‘bear raids,’ etc., and expect early recovery’ since…’the bear news appears to be put out maliciously, in order to cause prices to decline further.” It usually takes a painful slide into a grotto of losses before the trader determines that “there is no use fighting the manipulators” and suddenly we have a surge of short selling.       
  
Does this sound familiar? It’s been going on for a hundred years folks.        
  
Selden speaks of the “Market Makers” that have always made it so, although he doesn’t call them this, he simply calls them “They”. He discusses the possibility of “They” being the large investment banks, the floor traders or big oil companies. He mentions this long before we had high frequency trading, trader bots or even online brokerages. Somehow, the market makers have not changed much with all our technological advancement.         

          

I know quite personally the mistake of many traders/investors to rely on research analysts to tell them where a stock or the broad market will go, but we forget that analysts don’t trade. They are not experienced in the art of trading so how is it that we trust them to tell us how we should do so?          

         

These are often the manipulators who spread the rumors in order make the stock trade a certain way. The sell side analyst has a client for whom he wishes to be correct so that he can continue to sell his research and assessment. By the time companies report earnings the miss or hits in the earnings reports are often expected by analysts who know they have spread the rhetoric so that the expectations have moved the prices in the direction that they said they would even before earnings are reported. There is much truth to the idea that expectations are usually priced in and only when there is a surprise do we get real movement after earnings. If the consensus is for a stock to have good earnings, for example, it is very easy for the analyst to set those expectations just a little high all the while knowing that the stock will run up into earnings by having set those expectations and this is why many seasoned traders will often sell out before the earnings report because even if the earnings meet expectations, the price has already been run up and will now come down.           
Selden devotes a chapter to this concept which he calls, “Confusing the Present with Future Discounting”.           
We may be easily impressed by these analysts who write eloquently and make calls that come into fruition not admitting that “They” made them so.           

        

We may be equally impressed by the analyst who debunks other analysts because his analysis is more accurate. Certainly there are some who are better than others at running the numbers and making accurate predictions. These debunker analysts of analysts are the true professionals, we say. This is who shall lead our trading decisions because they so eloquently and accurately debunked the calls of the other analysts, but again we forget that a good analyst is not necessarily a good trader. He does not trade; he is usually restricted by his firm and is rarely allowed to trade in the firm’s effort to not raise flags to the powers that be. Rarely does the portfolio manager in a large hedge fund do his own analysis. He usually buys the research from the sell side analysts and employs his analysts to either debunk or affirm the sell side’s analysis. The portfolio manager eventually makes his own decisions which may take the analysis into account although, if he is well seasoned, realizes that the time frame of the analysis is what he needs to correct.            

       

I will sideline here for just a moment to give you a bit more detail of the start in my own career which I have mentioned before. The money manager and hedge fund for which I started out was a very rare occurrence.             

      

I was very interested in learning about the market and how to trade it. I interviewed for this job with this small hedge fund. I had much double entry accounting experience under my belt and this well known and respected Money Manager / Venture Capitalist hired me to do the accounting for his fund. It was a fairly large fund considering how little staff was involved. The fund managed a large sum by most standards and the staff consisted of this money manager and me and no one else. It is unheard of in the industry for a money manager to run such a large fund with a staff of one book keeper inexperienced in the ways of Mr. Market. He hired me not just because I interviewed well, had much accounting experience, good references and proved that I could do math quickly and accurately in my head, but because I answered the 100 million dollar question when he asked me why I wanted the job. I told him, “because I want to learn how to make a lot of money”. And so he took me under his wing and gave me a beginning for which I will always be grateful.              

     

The first stock that I modeled under his direction and that we subsequently analyzed together was $NFLX. It was July of 2005 and we decided that it was clearly a short at its current sub $20 price. I probably don’t need to show you a chart of $NFLX for you to guess that we were dead wrong. It not only went up from there, but is now trading at well over $200. But at the time we were convinced that the financials were over valued and had to come down. This was my first lesson in price action although I did not realize it at the time. I did not yet understand why traders or money managers hired analysts or purchased sell side research. It is quite rare to be unbiased enough as a trader to also be your own analyst for the analysis will sway you, once again led by those pesky emotions.               

    

I have also heard many on this site scream some of the same words that Selden describes as being said by a conservative individual when he describes the danger of getting a “notion” in one’s head. “You meet a highly conservative individual and ask him what he thinks of the situation. ‘I am alarmed at the rapid spread of radical sentiment,’ he replies. ‘How can we expect capital to branch out into new enterprises when the profits may be swept away at any moment by socialistic legislation?’”                

   

Have we not heard the same rhetoric in recent years with regards to the Obama administration? How many watchers of Fox News have declared the same sentiment for today’s America as if it has never been suggested before. My own Mother in her conservative extremism had declared the Czars of Obama policy would destroy all that America stands for. She has believed this to be true since he took office as if no one had ever said this before.                 

  

I am pretty sure Alan Greenspan felt the same way as he sat by Ayn Rand’s side mesmerized by her philosophy which she so beautifully articulated and which later caused the famed Fed Chairman to allow our banking system, unregulated, to dig a hole so deep as to collapse the market. Not that this collapse was anything new, nor that he or anyone else had the ability to negate it. I hear so many talk of the impossibility for our economy to recover because of the lack of jobs. Do you think no one has said that before? Surely we can all imagine this sentiment in the early 1930’s. Selden discusses this same sentiment having taken place in 1909. And in a recent viewing of the film The Game from 1997 with Michael Douglas and Sean Penn, the idea that the economy would never recover because jobs were never to come back was a background theme. The reverse of this is he who speaks radically that spending and high cost of living are unimportant when compared against the trillions of dollars of new wealth that will certainly ensue and he is of course, a convicted bull.                  

 

All of these ideas hinder the trader simply because we have them. We do not innately have the ability to “go with the flow”, to curb our emotions and not take a side. I have been fortunate enough to meet one such trader, although I will not name him for I have already spent too much time as a marketeer (sic) in this role as King of The Peanut Gallery. If you recognize the value of this ability, you will or maybe already have searched it out. That trader who can curb his emotions and remain unbiased in the face of so much bias. The trader who can, as Selden preaches, “keep out of the market, when in doubt, because delays, do indeed, cost less than losses.”                   
This is my final word. The market is behaving normally. The market has always behaved normally for this is how the market behaves. Don’t fight it for acceptance will allow you to finally be unbiased. Trust in the price action and “go with the flow”. I hope this helps and I wish you all the best of luck in your gambling as traders. And again I thank you for the opportunity to serve as your King. It has truly been a wild ride.               

Sincerely,          

The Artful Wife               

Comments »

Fundamentals for Dumb-Me – Part 3: The Good and The Ugly

It’s not The Good, The Bad and The Ugly.

Let’s face it, when you are trading stocks, there is no in between. There is only The Good and The Ugly and nobody likes ugly. So how can  you keep from being some dope sitting at a bar after four tequilas unable to tell if that chick or dude (or stock) is ugly?

In the previous post, I laid out for you some ideas that can help you determine if a company is profitable and being well managed. Previous to that, I gave you instructions to help you find a reasonable value for a company so that you can have an idea of where the stock price could go and thus determine if the stock is a good buy. But there is no point in doing all that work on a company that is being run into the ground by its management because that is just plain ugly!

Before we continue, let me say once again, that while what I am presenting here is certainly true and a good argument for fundamentals, many stocks don’t give a damn what they are worth. After all, I have certainly made a case for the idea that all this fundamental noise never made me a better trader, but charting has.

Since I have shared with you a few of my tricks for simple valuation and looking up data for free on the Internets, let’s take a look at how those fundamentals actually move a stock. I present for you two companies for comparison. $AMSC and $EMKR. These companies tracked one another rather closely early on .

Take a look at this chart from 1998 to 2007. I have plotted with simple lines here so that you can easily see the comparison. Notice how closely they tracked each other during this time frame. They were pretty well matched.

The following chart compares the two companies from 2001 to present day. Note the divergence since 2008. Can you guess why these companies went in such different directions?

Now let’s take a look at their income statements. Here are the Revenue and Operating Expenses using the past five quarters for $AMSC. Notice how the revenues and costs increased at a reasonable rate.  Margins are working nicely for this company. Management clearly has a good handle on running this business and keeping it profitable.

When we look at $EMKR’s income statement over the past five quarters, however, we can see that sales and costs are sporadic and that management clearly has trouble making this company profitable. In fact, they are just flat out losing money.

This quick little check can help you decide whether you should even bother flirting much less consider taking him/her home. If you do, you will only be left broke and disgusted in the morning.

Comments »

Fundamentals for Dumb-Me – Part 2: Trust Yourself

Trust yourself and not some goofy sell sider

When you are valuing a company, you need to have an income statement, or model, as the hedge fund folks call it. (Just a quick sideline here; when I ask my analyst friends what they are doing, they love to say that they are “working on models.” They are all men, of course…the analysts, not the models.)

When I first started in this wacky business, I was working for a hedge fund manager who required me to learn how to create models. I would painstakingly look up the historical numbers for sales, costs, cash flow, debt, etc. on the 10K filings and enter them into an Excel worksheet. I found this to be a tedious and miserable task. I always struggled to see the little cells that I had to put the numbers into. In those days, for whatever reason, we didn’t magnify everything so that it was easy to read and see. I had quite a bit of accounting under my belt, but this frustrated me.

The joy came when we looked at the model/spreadsheet together and made predictions about where the company was going and what its true value was. You can get models already built, of course, from Factset or Reuters but these require costly subscriptions upwards of $9K per year.

Soon thereafter, thehusband also got a job in the biz. For the longest time, after I started trading on my own, I would ask him,  my in-house analyst, to provide me with whatever models I needed  and I was fortunate that he could easily provide them to me. After a while, however, I found even reading those models to be tedious. They had way more information than I really needed and I started looking elsewhere for the information I wanted. Historical data is perfectly well represented on Google Finance. I can  easily double check the numbers and fill in the blanks to be sure I am using the correct data, and for the most part, I find they do a pretty good job with accuracy.

If you are still reading this, you are likely interested enough in valuing companies and including fundamentals in your analysis, but I realize that you may not be familiar with all of the accounting terms herein. If you come across a term that you are not acquainted with, just plug it into the keyword search at dictionary . I have taken the liberty of linking a few of the terms for you.

Look at an income statement in Google Finance for a particular company and check to see which direction revenue and costs are going. For example, if costs are going up but sales are not, you might consider that the company is expanding or spending for advertising which could allow for greater sales in the long run. If it is a newer company, it may not even have been profitable yet. Companies need to invest money for Manufacturing, Research and Development, Advertising and of course staff, long before they can sell a product or service and become profitable, so again, direction is of the utmost importance.

I present to you the current income statement for $CSUN below. Please note that all dollar amounts are represented in the millions.

One of the things I like here is that as the Operating Expenses grow quarter over quarter and so does Revenue. In fact, Revenue growth accelerates more rapidly so that the company uses its expenses to earn more money over time resulting in a higher Net Income. This tells me that management is doing their job correctly and costs are being used appropriately; Margins are getting better. I also note that  over the five quarters listed, the company seems to have had some cost issues in the fourth quarter of 2009 but managed to correct this in the more recent quarters. This is also good news with regards to the company’s direction.

If I am concerned about the accuracy of these numbers, I can cross check them against the actual filings to be sure that they are accurate…a whole lot less work than looking up the numbers and plugging them into a spreadsheet to begin with.

I would also like to note that while analysts generally only include Research & Development and sales/admin expenses etc in Operating Expenses, Google Finance also includes Cost of Revenue and calls it Total Operating Expenses. This is simply a matter of terminology, but I want to clear that up in case the term Op/Ex gets thrown around and has a significantly different figure from what is included here. Personally, I feel the Total Op/Ex is a more accurate depiction of what it costs to create the revenue.

The other important piece to this puzzle is the the Diluted Shares and Diluted EPS which you can and should also cross reference in the company’s latest press release. You will want to be sure that the diluted share count is correct as some companies have been known to withhold warrant or conversion shares from their Basic Share count which can make it seem like they have a higher EPS, and as you know, you cannot value a company without an accurate EPS.

Once you have confirmed these numbers, you can move on to forward valuation.  You will want to include the most recent earnings and fill in the blanks for coming quarters. Your best bet is to listen to the conference call so that you can plug in accurate numbers for the current quarter as well as for growth. Doing this as the numbers are released during the call will allow you to make a decision before the stock moves in a particular direction based on the new earnings call. New earnings information will take time to populate so you will want to be on top of it.

Once you have all this information, you can go back and do the work from my first post on fundamentals and can get a fairly accurate valuation of the company you are looking at while knowing that you have crosschecked all the numbers yourself and are not just counting on some analysts point of view.

fundamentals-for-dumb-me-the-very-basics

The Earnings Statement follows.



Comments »

It’s not about Stock Picking

It has been brought to my attention that a false impression has been drawn about 12631. The consensus is that we are all about stock picking. After all, we highlight the great stock picks that BFTO almost daily. This is how I and others have promoted it.

So I feel the need to kill that idea right now. 12631 is not about stock picking. The great stock picks have been the upshot of what we are actually doing which is technical analysis. Even if you are a fundamental investor, it doesn’t hurt to learn some technical analysis.

ChessNwine and I have pointed out many times that if you are going to buy a stock based on fundamentals for a long term play, you  might as well find the best entry using technical analysis. Otherwise, you are just guessing at a bottom and getting into a stock because you believe it to be undervalued, which fundamentally makes sense, but you could easily find yourself sitting in a position that is not ready to move or that hasn’t bottomed yet. As you ride it down into the abyss, your capital is tied up over that period of time unnecessarily.
A little technical analysis would do you good.

If you are already basing some of your trades on technical analysis and wish to upgrade your game, Chess and RC are wonderful teachers. The education there is well presented and comprehensible and includes charts, videos and downloads.
Jusy sayin’.

Comments »

A Tribute to Greatness!

I had intended to focus my near term writing time toward composing the simple fundamental posts that I have promised to you. I am working on them,  but I would be remiss if I did not take a moment to give you a quick summary of the day.

First I will give myself a small pat on the back for finding and executing my $ORCL trade that I highlighted here a couple of days ago. I locked in good gains by selling half of my position after purchasing this morning, but I suspect it will continue to do well so I am holding a nice sized position.  I am doubly confident since it does not report earnings until March and is buoyed by strong earnings in the sector.

But the real reason that I am writing this post tonight, is to tell you about an extraordinary trade that was called today by The Amazing RAGINCAJUN in 12631. Stock picking skills like his are pure genius; He is astonishingly gifted not just for this one trade, but for the consistency with which he so often calls trades like these.

RC pointed out $MOBI to us early in the day in the 12631 Pelican Room, when it was at $5.34. It closed firmly over $6 reaching a high of $6.23 intra-day. He bought this ticker minutes before it started beasting out and those of us who were fortunate enough to follow are grateful to be a part of this greatness for it is truly $MOBI-ssimo!

If you are a trader who is not taking advantage of The PPT, you are a fool. If you are a trader who is not taking advantage of 12631, then you are just not banking as much coin as we are.  If you are not aware of this incredible service, then you cannot be held accountable for your ignorance. Take note and check it out.
If you do already know about us but you are not trading with us in Pelican Stadium, then I have no pity for you, because you have consciously chosen not to be a part of  the supremacy that is available to you. You have chosen to be less.

I take my hat off to RC, chessNwine and all that is 12631 and I feel proud to be a part of it. But tonight I raise my glass in honor of the superb skills of an incredible trader, RaginCajun. Cheers to you good sir and thank you.

Comments »