“The 7th Circuit Court of Appeals may have just dealt a serious blow to the U.S. Constitution.
In a unanimous decision earlier this month the Court determined that law enforcement officers are not required to present a warrant or charges before forcibly entering a person’s home, searching it, and confiscating their firearms if they believe it is in the individual’s best interests.
The landmark suit was brought before the court by Krysta Sutterfield of Milwaukee, who had recently visited a psychiatrist for outpatient therapy resulting from some bad news that she had received. According to court records Sutterfield had expressed a suicidal thought during the visit, perhaps tongue-in-cheek, when she said “I guess I’ll go home and blow my brains out.” This prompted her doctor to contact police.
For several hours the police searched for Sutterfield….”
If you enjoy the content at iBankCoin, please follow us on Twitter
It was suicide prevention under the advise of the woman’s Phychiatrist. Not a constitutional crisis, imo. The shrink refused to call off the police, so there must have been some serious thought that she might go through with it.
This does not make sense.
The court is contradicting itself by violating the very principle of a woman’s right to do whatever she pleases with her own body. AKA Roe v. Wade.
How can a person have “choice” in one manner but not another?
Many suicides occur when a person is temporarily distraught. Psychiatrists know this. She may have killed herself (and perhaps, or probably not) but it was the type of situation where someone may employ the “permanent solution to a temporary problem.”
just for you budh
http://jhaines6.wordpress.com/2014/05/27/kevin-annett-popes-reference-to-satanic-mass-in-relation-to-catholic-child-rape-constitutes-his-tacit-knowledge-of-such-a-crime-common-law-court/
Great find Cronk – was actually just looking for more materials related to this.