© Copyright 2007-2023 iBankCoin All rights reserved under penalty of bodily harm. DISCLAIMER: This is a personal web site, reflecting the opinions of its author(s). It is not a production of my employer, and it is unaffiliated with any FINRA broker/dealer. Statements on this site do not represent the views or policies of anyone other than myself. The information on this site is provided for discussion purposes only, and are not investing recommendations. Under no circumstances does this information represent a recommendation to buy or sell securities. DATA INFORMATION IS PROVIDED TO THE USERS "AS IS." NEITHER iBankCoin, NOR ITS AFFILIATES, NOR ANY THIRD PARTY DATA PROVIDER MAKE ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND REGARDING THE DATA INFORMATION, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE. Privacy Policy
BID getting clown raped after hours – the buying opportunity you’ve been waiting for?
yep
Senor Fly, thank you for sharing. In your experience, are calls from such investors fairly analogous to appellate argument? Meaning, are larger sized investors, or their agents (referring to callers), looking to clarify statements prospectively or as a potential buy (both – with general impressions already presumptive)? Thanks if and when you find the time.
Please disregard, it’s all about Ibc_Fn:
“Columbia law school professor John Coffee said that the SEC may be simply showing “an excessive level of suspiciousness.”
“I think Rosenfeld is saying that we are nervous about what companies are telling analysts when analysts make calls directly to the company after earnings calls,” Coffee said. “But it’s unrealistic to say that stuff is surprising because of the obvious need to get more information and clarification.”