Where are we going with this type of behavior ?
If you enjoy the content at iBankCoin, please follow us on Twitter
© Copyright 2007-2024 iBankCoin All rights reserved under penalty of bodily harm. DISCLAIMER: This is a personal web site, reflecting the opinions of its author(s). It is not a production of my employer, and it is unaffiliated with any FINRA broker/dealer. Statements on this site do not represent the views or policies of anyone other than myself. The information on this site is provided for discussion purposes only, and are not investing recommendations. Under no circumstances does this information represent a recommendation to buy or sell securities. DATA INFORMATION IS PROVIDED TO THE USERS "AS IS." NEITHER iBankCoin, NOR ITS AFFILIATES, NOR ANY THIRD PARTY DATA PROVIDER MAKE ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND REGARDING THE DATA INFORMATION, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE. Privacy Policy
Total bullshit. That’s why my kid goes to private school.
Can the cops arrest some of the teachers for being incapable?
no,they have a union label they stand behind, so parents cant throw tomatoes at them
bottom line, the cops arrest (perhaps detain is a better word), the courts convict and determine a sentence, but if you simply label the person a “terrorist” and fail to disclose information due to “national security” concerns, it doesn’t really matter who it is. The cops aren’t going to do this since the provision granted the military access to hold prisoners of war indefinitely, but not the police force as regular arrests are still subject to a fair trial, unless given specific orders from the commander in chief.
The cops aren’t lawyers, they can arrest whoever they want. It is the courts and the superiors that decide whether their arrest was for just reasons and whether the cops are fit for duty. This is why the NDAA provisions allowing arrests without a fair trial is a dangerous law, because it allows people to arrest out of bias. A dictator potentially could label congressmen he disagrees with as terrorists and who’s to stop him from using this power to rig an election or take dictatorial powers? The courts? The courts only interpret the law as written and the way it’s worded, it is not terrorists that have been proven to be terrorists by the court of law, but simply those deamed a suspect. So if a president views supreme court justices as a threat to his desire to take rule, what’s to prevent him from imprisoning them as well? Or threatening to do so. The military answers to the commander in chief so if they have the power to arrest, anything like this becomes possible. Without a fair trial you raise your conviction rate to 100% like Stalin had.
It may not be likely, but given enough time it becomes a lot more likely to occur at least once. Certainly it would not be unlikely for someone to lie and use the political process as a way to get in control and feed the power trip of someone who then exploits whatever powers are possible to gain more control.
Such an accusation of them passing this act for that reason is a baseless accusation, however even if they have good intentions, not everyone does, and they are granting access to not just the current president but every president from now on the power to imprison every congressmen and women and anyone who opposes the plan, and by the time they try to fillibuster it or prevent such action it will be too late, the military full of hyped up kids told to go get someone, without doing research will think they are the bad guys and will have already responded loyally to the commander in chief.
but of course the system isn’t what it used to be, and now we just have a more oppressive rule of government over the people.
The poor rob and the rich embezzle. The politicians “change” the law to maintain status quo.
The middle class get the ant managers and police (now armed with semi-auto rifles + NDAA), to ensure taxation, threats of imprisonment and lawyers get work.
Have a good day. Dismissed.