iBankCoin
Stock advice in actual English.
Joined Sep 2, 2009
1,224 Blog Posts

A Global Power Shift Is Emerging

Short term cautions not withstanding, we are on the precipice of something great.

The entire structure of the global economy is shifting, slightly and slowly. But like all great change, the most striking of the movement comes all at once, at the end.

The United States is driving this assault of the balances of power, globally, as the energy revolution progresses on our shores. This country is set to become the biggest oil producer in the world – and we are now slowly removing the export restrictions that are the last remaining barrier to this end.

This isn’t just about US trade balances and deficits. Those numbers games matter, but they always matter less than you think.

This game is about power. Oil has been the source of power to our enemies for too long. Russia and the Middle East have fed well on global consumption of this product, erecting their cartels around the flow oil to global industry. It has made them powerful and a threat.

The move by the US to become the world’s largest producer of oil and gas can be viewed through a different lens than financial gain alone: this is also going to completely upend our adversaries. What wars and weapons and diplomacy and cooperation could not possibly have accomplished, given the entrenched interests we faced, this one mighty push on our part will quickly bring about.

This is a once in a lifetime opportunity. You must get invested in it, and stay invested in it. All US leadership sees the goal, and no one objects to it. The days of getting beat about by monarchies in Saudi Arabia, needing to cut backroom deals that undermine our own morals with foreign militant groups, having to sit through endless meetings while Russian oligarchs threaten our allies with gas supply shortages…these days are coming to an end.

As the US increasingly becomes energy independent, the argument to even have relations with half these villains becomes non sequitur. We can marginalize them while circling around our true allies and real friends.

I can’t see everything that is going to come from this. Naturally US power will follow. And the North and South American continents should improve, swinging towards democracy and capitalism. Outside of that, while I think US energy independence is a good thing, I wouldn’t be surprised if war also follows. Revolutions surely, but also open war between foreign, former energy exporters who find themselves being boxed into a corner. The Saudi’s days are surely numbered, in particular.

My bet is that Russia will not change much, but they will also have to cut less lucrative deals with China to make it. So at least they will be a less powerful, less interfering Russia. Good riddance there.

Suffice to say, this is unpredictability at its best. While I think I see the theme, I do not yet hear the notes. But I’ll take my chances with it anyway. The old order of things was repulsive. I won’t be crying any tears for OPEC, or for Russia.

If you enjoy the content at iBankCoin, please follow us on Twitter

11 comments

  1. bonobo smores

    I appreciate your enthusiasm for energy. Bought some BP based on this article
    http://www.oilandenergydaily.com/2014/07/02/bp-cnooc-lng-deal/

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  2. TJWP

    So do you really think US intervetionism is driven by a need to secure foreign oil interests? I view it as far more complicated, with many competing financial interests, some of which are energy, but also military, industrial… etc

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
    • Mr. Cain Thaler
      Mr. Cain Thaler

      I think that US interventionism will have the capacity to remake itself to a form that closer emulates our values.

      So the US army sitting out fights where we have no allies or interests, i.e. a war amongst our enemies.

      Or the US army siding with the democracy seeking revolutionaries in a civil war, rather than keeping the despot in power.

      There will be situations, like Libya or Iraq, where we just laugh and stay out of it. Or other times like with Crimea where we aren’t afraid to become more directly involved.

      I’d like to see US policy start providing aid to allies who espouse our principles, shun those that don’t, and keep our military activities in line in such a way that supports the US brand and national history, rather than undermines it.

      • 0
      • 0
      • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
      • TJWP

        That would be wonderful, a great vision of the future but a tough road to get there. I’m not an advocate of isolationism, but there needs to be some sort of actual criteria for a war/intervention rather than “well it suits my current policy objectives short term”

        • 0
        • 0
        • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  3. bottom_feeder

    So if I were to allocate a percentage of my investments to this strategy, say 10%. Where do I start?

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
    • Mr. Cain Thaler
      Mr. Cain Thaler

      There are a few places where you probably want to stick money, if you’re looking for a broad, low volatility allocation.

      The well owners – these are names like BP, APC, CHK; they tend to be big, and benefit directly from adoption of natural gas, via increased sales volumes and price increases

      The drillers – here you have names like BAS, SLB, HAL, etc. The US is supplying big opportunity for these guys to get out there and get to work

      Frac Sand producers – SLCA and HCLP are the two big beneficiaries on the radar. If you want to keep the production coming, you buy the sand they offer

      Logistics Logistics Logistics – just because you have gas, so what? How you gonna move it? Names like ETP get the gas around the country. Names like TLP move oil, petroleum and gas by rail. Names like PNY get it to households.

      If that’s what you’re going for, you need to find a nice cluster of stocks in each of these groupings and allocate to all of them.

      I own BAS, HCLP, and ETP of the list above, currently.

      • 0
      • 0
      • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
      • Mr. Cain Thaler
        Mr. Cain Thaler

        As an aside comment, just because I listed a name above does not mean I am endorsing it. I am simply pointing out to the brush strokes one should take to paint a picture.

        • 0
        • 0
        • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
      • ictmoneyman

        Mr. Thaler, thank you for your insight. The three companies you referenced have had a tremendous run. Can you disclose your cost basis? For a long term hold can your recommend purchasing at these elevated prices? What is the allocation percentage (of your portfolio) towards this sector? Thank you in advance. Would love to private message inside 12631 anytime.

        • 0
        • 0
        • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
        • Mr. Cain Thaler

          BAS, HCLP and ETP are 45% of my account, but that’s largely thanks to BAS and HCLP going on a monster run.

          Cost Basis:
          HCLP: $23.99
          BAS: $12.00
          ETP: $56.60

          • 0
          • 0
          • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
          • Mr. Cain Thaler

            I’d recommend looking at HCLP and ETP here. BAS is more of a coin toss

            • 0
            • 0
            • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"