What the fuck, I like the police state now.
Here’s a kid who was coddled by Mommy — home schooled and probably ventured out online for social interaction.
Austin, TX bomber identified as Mark Anthony Conditt.
Mother's facebook posts indicate that children were home schooled and Mark was planning on a carrying out a mission trip years ago. #AustinBombing pic.twitter.com/MGwzMglIRG— Brandon Busch (@RadioBrando) March 21, 2018
Does he fit the profile of a fucking terrorist? He had no priors, apparently a nice home with a caring Mother who invested her life in him; and what does this absolute faggot do to repay her? He becomes a fucking terrorist. What a fucked up time this is in America.
As you know, he literally blew himself up today after authorities found him. What’s interesting about the police work to find him is the fact they used Google search history to do it. I know libertarians will be like “OMG, how dare you infringe…” Fuck off. Coppers had zero leads and its citizens were being blown to pieces. I applaud this use of the police state and hope it is used responsibly in the future to capture faggots who deserve to blow themselves up.
If you enjoy the content at iBankCoin, please follow us on TwitterA man whom authorities were attempting to arrest early Wednesday in a string of bombing attacks in Austin killed himself with an explosive device as authorities closed in, a high-ranking law enforcement official told the American-Statesman.
The official said authorities identified a suspect in the past 24 hours based largely on information gained after police said the suspect shipped an explosive device from a FedEx store in Sunset Valley, a suburb surrounded by Austin. That evidence included security video.
Authorities also relied upon store receipts showing suspicious transactions from the person and obtained a search warrant for his Google search history that showed him conducting searches they considered suspicious, the official said.
Police state power used responsibly? Fat chance.
Much preferred to grant me vigilante powers, and a few long-ass bandoliers.
The real question is, would you prefer to give people that you don’t know vigilante powers?
Every police state uses power responsibly, did you not know that? Whoever opposes the regime is found quickly and expediently dealt with in accordance with the party sentiment…for example, jewish bolsheviks in mother Russia used their marxist powers to torture enemies of communism to death. Just look at all these other examples of using power responsibly,
http://www.paulbogdanor.com/left.html
Sarc, were you surprised that the bomber was a White Male and not Jewish, Muslim, Black, Middle Eastern,Female, etc?
Not at all. I would have been surprised if it was not a white male. I expected it. There’s a lot more to this story…just wait how the jewmedia starts demonizing white, homeschooled christians, the enemies of the oppressed minorities, etc, etc. My take? Patsy dies – first indication of false flag. There’s war on white males. Let’s wait for the spin.
Are you sure that the box bomber wasn’t Jewish or Muslim (or Christian or Hindu or Athiest or whatever)? Does skin color now identify religious belief?
And so there you have it. The box bomber was a white religious conservative who attended regularly church services at the Austin Stone Community Church on St. John’s Avenue and hated homosexuality and abortions. Any questions before the jewmedia takes over and tells you what I already sketched out for you? The demonizing of white Christians by the jewmedia starts in 3,..2,..
https://tinyurl.com/ycerj8mh
You mean it wasn’t SAC? Just another hater who can’t control his impulses.
I’m wondering if he was on prescriptions or not. If he wasn’t then its more disturbing to me.
Libertarians don’t like people who hurt other people. That’s the primary tenant.
The problem with libertarianism is that it doesn’t work in when there are agreements between entties at different levels of power.
For example, if someone has a natural water source and a multinational corporation pollutes it, Libertarianism says that the owner will sue for compensation and win. We all know how reality works. Also, monopolies are legit in Libertarianism. Monopolies elimiante competition and then jack up the prices when they become too big to compete against.
There’s a good reason that Libertarians are almost always in the top 30% of income, and usually so were their parents.
Another problem is it fails to recognize that groups of people will vote together to oppress other groups and steal power from the individual… like hordes of third world immigrants that couldn’t care less about culture/history/civil rights.
Libertarianism has run it’s course. People now realize that it is at odds with national identity, dignity and a sense of belonging to something. Collectivism in this sense is essential. There is an excellent discussion by Professor Duchesne here:
https://redice.tv/red-ice-radio/conservative-gatekeepers-jordan-peterson-steven-pinker-and-jonathan-haidt
Cricket, Jordan Peterson is a bit of weasel who cannot answer a very very simple question. Watch,
https://youtu.be/mc3o4YmHJbc
(expect this vid being deleted imminently)
“Austin Bomber Found Using Google Search History” -> Fake news
They found him with FedEx cameras + receipts. How could they get a Google seacrh history without knowing his identity **first**?
The warrant was a follow-up to build a case (to show criminal intent/motive) against him for the trial, which is no longer necessary…
WRONG
The google search history corroborated what police thought were suspicious receipts. Are you always this dense, or do you ham it up for me?
So if I’m the dense one, then why don’t you explain how the polcie got their search warrant?
In case you’re wondering, a google search history can be narrowed down to, let’s say a geographic area, and the cross referenced by “HOW TO BUILD A BOMB” searches.
Another reason to use OPSEC and always use a VPN.
Used responsibly? It’s not being used that way now. There are times that it will catch a bad guy and many more times that it will infringe on the good ones. Stupid statement by the fly.
What are you hiding? If it saves lives it’s worth it.
Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
Trite cliche. Join us in the real world when you’re ready.
Yes, it’s a cliche, but some of us don’t want to live in a Minority Report police state.
You do amd have and will.
@#, that pre-crime ship already sailed…25 years for victimless offense just because something could’ve happen. This guy never hurt anyone,
https://tinyurl.com/ycp9e8mt
You shouldn’t put people in prison for criems they haven’t committed yet, but people should lsoe their rights if they use them in a dangerous manner
Here’s how it should go (basically)
1) Drunk driving (repeat offense) -> lose you driving license
2) Drive without a license (repeat offended) -> You drive drunk once, you lose your right to own a car.
3) Knowingly allow someoen without a license to drive your car -> YOU lose the right to own a car.
Pretty similar to how I feel about guns.
Does any reasonably intelligent person have an expectation of privacy when on the internet, without taking relatively easy steps to cover one’s tracks? Should there be an expectation of privacy on the open internet?
It is almost impossible to maintain absolute privacy on today’s Internet. The best one can do is to control which corporations have access to one’s data, but complete anonymity is a thing of the past. Even VPNs and DNS Encryption still leave a trail that can be followed.
There are no absolutes. 99% privacy – Open Source Live O/S Tails
https://tails.boum.org/
Cambridge Analytica helps Feds nail Austin Bomber by scraping Facebook. All is forgiven.