iBankCoin
Home / 2011 (page 229)

Yearly Archives: 2011

No Market for Bold Men

________

The resilience of this market has been, and continues to be, exceptionally impressive. Today’s big move higher could easily be the start of another improbable comeback by the bulls to fresh 52 week highs. However, I am reticent to put my money on that thesis just yet. What am I looking to see? A break and hold above 1332 would force me to get involved on the long side, because it would represent a breach of a the descending resistance trendline, dating back a few weeks (see chart below).

________

________

However, I am also mindful that there are only so many chess pieces that the bulls can sacrifice to bears as a trap, before they end up trapping themselves. The best example that I can give you is last April’s topping pattern, in 2010. Actually, it was May 3, 2010, to be precise, just a few days before the “flash crash.” The S&P 500 wound up closing higher by 14 points. Of course, it ended up being a classic situation of the bulls finally trapping themselves after a long uptrend, followed by a volatile period of choppy price action. Note the prior week’s price action before May 3rd–Look familiar?

My hat is off to anyone who has precisely nailed the past week or two of trading. In situations like this, I have no problem putting ego aside and sitting in cash. If these levels are breached, in either direction (1332 upside, below 1300 on downside), then I will adjust accordingly.

_________

Comments »

The Significance of Not Going On Tilt (Archives)

___________

Below is the text of a post that I originally published on May 13, 2010. I am reposting it now because I believe it is particularly relevant to the state of the current market, as well as for the the viability of the concepts and theories mentioned herein.

___________

Ever since March 2009, virtually every time that we have had a market correction it seems as though we have been on the verge of ending the bull run and starting a new phase of the bear market.  Often times, however, just as it seemed as if the bears were about to push the broad indices down through their respective 200 day moving averages, the market would stop on a dime and proceed to sharply turn up on low volume and make new highs.

This phenomenon has been especially frustrating to many traders who were not already fully invested, because they never really got a good chance to reenter.  Many technical traders, in particular, missed out on a lot of those moves higher because they either sat out or decided to go short.  Needless to say, they either missed out on some big profits, or lost a lot of capital trying to go short (or both).  Indeed, the correct play was to simply go along for the ride and chalk the whole thing up to us climbing the “wall of worry” that the early to middle stages of bull markets are so famous for.   It was also correct to dismiss the low volume rallies as being due to the fact that we had a huge gap/vacuum/void to fill from the crash of 2008, which had alleviated a significant amount of selling pressure.

At the beginning of this month, however, several key indices and sectors had recovered many or all of the losses from pre 2008 crash levels.  Because of that fact,  the notion of ignoring the low volume on rallies has become less and less valid. Beyond that, many key leading stocks since 2009 have either become too extended, or have broken down on heavy selling volume.

One trend I am noticing amongst traders is that they have grown so frustrated with trying to short technically weak charts, that they are now using what would normally be their own sound analysis as a contrary indicator.  Instead of going short, they think “I really got squeezed hard the last few times I tried shorting this stock that was up against heavy resistance after a weak volume rally.  So, this time I will go long, even though I know this is a short.”

That kind of thinking can be very dangerous for several reasons.  First off, as I noted before, the market has now effectively filled most or all of the huge gap created by the 2008 crash, so the drift up unsupported by volume argument is weaker than before. Next, to use your own sound technical analysis as a contrary indicator is a mistake because you are allowing the market to throw you off your game–or effectively put you “on tilt.”  The phrase, “on tilt” is a common term used in the poker world, whereby a player loses his cool and changes his playing style for the worse due to a multitude of reasons.

One example of going on tilt would be if you are dealt pocket kings before the flop in a Texas Hold ’em poker game.  You raise, and an opponent goes all-in.  You ponder if your opponent has pocket aces (the only hand that has you beat), but eventually you correctly call, as your opponent turns up pocket queens, meaning you are a huge favorite to win.  When the dealer flips a queen on the board with no king in sight, you lose all of the money you had in front of you.  Despite the painful short term result, you made the correct long term decision. In other words, if you keep making that same decision over the long run, it will be profitable. The odds of another (regular playing) opponent having pocket aces in that situation are not great enough to compel you to fold.

However, you become extremely frustrated from the short term result and think, “Well, if I cannot win playing good cards and making good decisions, then the hell with it.  I am going to gamble it up and play whatever crappy cards I want.”  It is exactly this kind of emotional, knee jerk response that causes otherwise good poker players to go on tilt, and to go broke.

In the stock market, not making those same knee jerk trading decisions based on painful short term results is equally as important, so long as you are making the technically sound decision that is profitable over the long run.

Comments »

So Far, So Chop

____________

After yesterday’s hard reversal down, we saw a rather ephemeral bounce this morning and have been chopping around the flatline ever since. Apart from some very quick intraday scalps, there really is not much to do in this market other than preserve your capital, energy, and especially your confidence. Suppose that you had engaged in a bunch of trades and got chopped up to essentially break even over the past few days. In the abstract, it sounds like all you lost were your commission fees. However, odds are that the hit not making any real profits took on your confidence was considerable, especially in light of the energy you exerted in deciding to take those trades in a tough market to begin with.

Instead of forcing swing trades in this market over the past few weeks, the better approach has been to preserve capital. As an example, the Nasdaq Composite Index is currently printing 2751. Yet, over a month and a half ago on January 14th, the Nazzy printed 2755. More importantly, as this bull run since September has matured, the amount of underlying high probability long setups has seemingly diminished by the week, to the point where you could probably count on one hand the number of charts to really get excited about on the long side.

Michael Jordan used to say that one of the reasons he went from being just a great player with no championship rings to a perennial NBA Finals victor was because he changed and finally allowed the basketball game to come to him. In other words, as talented as he was, he was previously trying too hard to force the action and “make” things happen–Which led to mistakes against tough teams in the playoffs. It was only when he relaxed a bit and picked his spots more carefully that was he was able to attain the highest level in his sport.

Let the market come to you.

Comments »

The Titanic Screen

_________

Inside The PPT, I created a screen that identifies high probability short setups for trades. The screen focuses on stocks that are experiencing distribution (heavy selling by institutions) and low relative strength, all of which cause The PPT algorithm to downgrade their daily “Hybrid scores,” which is a combination of technical and fundamental readings. I also sorted for names with an average daily volume of at least 500K daily shares, to avoid shorting relatively illiquid stocks.

Top Ideas from the screen:

  1. ARIA
  2. HPQ
  3. MDR

PPT & 12631 Members Click Here to view and modify the “12631 Titanic Short Screen”

(Double-click on screen below to see larger version of The PPT readout)

_________

Comments »