Twitter has a problem with child pornography. In 2012, the Guardian published an op-ed piece about Twitter failing to police an account containing child porn for several days after it was reported multiple times. Since then, Twitter has publicly stated that they will take measures to immediately ban and remove any accounts containing CP. Fast forward to now. Throughout the election, a hacker who has gone by various iterations of the handle “@0hour” has flooded the social network with all sorts of interesting and shocking things – including pictures of Bill Clinton with a young woman on what appears to be a private jet, as well as several photos purported to be clothed yet provocatively posed underage girls on Jeff Epstein’s “orgy island” (not posting). @0hour has been promptly banned by @Jack after tweeting these bombshells, and each time he creates a new account.

This week, “@0hour” (with his new account) started exposing a massive number of twitter accounts with openly displayed child porn, which Twitter has allowed to operate in broad daylight. After @0hour’s first several tweets, other Twitter users began sending him more and more CP related accounts – over 1000 by his count.

In response, Twitter immediately banned @0hour. The worst part? Many of the child porn accounts @0hour exposed were still operational long after the @0hour handle was banned.

Not only that, @0hour isn’t the only one who was banned for exposing child porn Twitter accounts… WHAT. THE. FUCK. @JACK?

Twitter also suspended Molly (@Eclipse_OW) for exposing thousands of Twitter child porn accounts.
EXPLAIN YOURSELF, @Jack.#TwitterGate pic.twitter.com/rrTkB7WmcT

— Brittany Pettibone (@BrittPettibone) November 21, 2016

Below are some of the tweets I took screenshots of after this whole thing unfolded. I’ve scrubbed the child porn handles. If you want to see more, just search twitter for #twittergate. @0hour is now going by @Caspers__ghost

 

 

I have to go fucking vomit too.

Why would Twitter suppress this information – banning the whistleblower instead of the pedos? This is unprecedented, and equivalent to aiding and abetting. Is @Jack silencing embarrassing bombshells like this in an attempt to salvage shareholder value to attract bidders (Disney?) that can save them from a death spiral?

Comments »

This is floating around:

A woman claiming to work at a bookstore sent out this tweet. A short while later the tweet was removed and her account is no longer active.

 

Here’s a closer look (click to enlarge), which I have transcribed below:

“The 2016 presidential election was unique in a number of ways. It saw the first major-party female nominee for the highest office in the country, the improbable rise of the kind of demagogue previously unknown in American politics and enough infighting and mudslinging for 10 election cycles. But as the tone of the election grew darker and more bizarre by the day, President-Elect Hillary Clinton “went high” when her opponent and his supporters went even lower. No stranger to trudging through the mire of misogyny in her career as first lady, senator and secretary of state. President-Elect Clinton continued to push for an issues-based campaign even as a handful of Trump’s most deplorable supporters, seeing the wide margin Clinton held among female voters, called to repeal the 19th amendment. On election day, Americans across the country roundly rejected the kind of fear and hate-based conservatism peddled by Donald Trump and elected the first woman in U.S. history to the presidency. The culminating election of a career in politics spanning three decades and arguably more experience than any other incoming president, 2016’s was not an easy race watch, comment on or be part of – but when the dust cleared it revealed a priceless moment in American history. The highest glass ceiling in the Western World had finally shattered.”

WTF! I’m trying to think of an explanation. Did Newsweek hedge their bets and send out two versions, one of which we haven’t seen? Could this have been a fake magazine doctored for this exact purpose? The surrounding scene looks pretty “back of a bookstore” to me, so I it at least appears that Newsweek devoted a lot of resources to a sure Hillary win.

Comments »