Twitter has a problem with child pornography. In 2012, the Guardian published an op-ed piece about Twitter failing to police an account containing child porn for several days after it was reported multiple times. Since then, Twitter has publicly stated that they will take measures to immediately ban and remove any accounts containing CP. Fast forward to now. Throughout the election, a hacker who has gone by various iterations of the handle “@0hour” has flooded the social network with all sorts of interesting and shocking things – including pictures of Bill Clinton with a young woman on what appears to be a private jet, as well as several photos purported to be clothed yet provocatively posed underage girls on Jeff Epstein’s “orgy island” (not posting). @0hour has been promptly banned by @Jack after tweeting these bombshells, and each time he creates a new account.

This week, “@0hour” (with his new account) started exposing a massive number of twitter accounts with openly displayed child porn, which Twitter has allowed to operate in broad daylight. After @0hour’s first several tweets, other Twitter users began sending him more and more CP related accounts – over 1000 by his count.

In response, Twitter immediately banned @0hour. The worst part? Many of the child porn accounts @0hour exposed were still operational long after the @0hour handle was banned.

Not only that, @0hour isn’t the only one who was banned for exposing child porn Twitter accounts… WHAT. THE. FUCK. @JACK?

Twitter also suspended Molly (@Eclipse_OW) for exposing thousands of Twitter child porn accounts.
EXPLAIN YOURSELF, @Jack.#TwitterGate pic.twitter.com/rrTkB7WmcT

— Brittany Pettibone (@BrittPettibone) November 21, 2016

Below are some of the tweets I took screenshots of after this whole thing unfolded. I’ve scrubbed the child porn handles. If you want to see more, just search twitter for #twittergate. @0hour is now going by @Caspers__ghost

 

 

I have to go fucking vomit too.

Why would Twitter suppress this information – banning the whistleblower instead of the pedos? This is unprecedented, and equivalent to aiding and abetting. Is @Jack silencing embarrassing bombshells like this in an attempt to salvage shareholder value to attract bidders (Disney?) that can save them from a death spiral?

Comments »

Twitter is blowing up right now over some “satanic” tweets by Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey (@Jack) made back in 2006. In light of the Podesta emails and #spiritcooking thing, talking about “satanic verses” while cooking pasta is probably the worst possible thing Dorsey could have tweeted.

Here’s the first one (source):

Then there’s this one, with outrage below (source):

 

While these tweets are indeed titillating at first glance, the logical conclusion is that Jack was reading Salman Rushdie’s book “The Satanic Verses.”

The Satanic Verses is Salman Rushdie’s fourth novel, first published in 1988 and inspired in part by the life of Muhammad. As with his previous books, Rushdie used magical realism and relied on contemporary events and people to create his characters. The title refers to the satanic verses, a group of Quranic verses that allow intercessory prayers to be made to three Pagan Meccan goddesses: Allāt, Uzza, and Manāt. The part of the story that deals with the “satanic verses” was based on accounts from the historians al-Waqidi and al-Tabari. (Wikipedia)

Looking up page 307 of the book, we find the following passage which apparently made Jack cry in his pasta:

‘ACID BATH’: She drowned while high on LSD (“acid”), but in various industrial processes metals are dipped into a literal “acid bath.”

And what did Jack need to turn back to on pages 86 and 87 for comfort?

Devout Sikhs never trim their beards or hair (Hindi).

While it doesn’t look like @Jack is a spirit cook, I think we’ve found the source of his power.

 

 

Comments »