A defiant Missouri State Senator Maria Chappelle-Nadal has called herself a patriot after receiving backlash over her call over Facebook to assassinate President Trump.
.@clairecmc & Lacy Clay calling for her #MOSEN resignation after @realDonaldTrump "assassination" post, but @MariaChappelleN says "no" #ksdk pic.twitter.com/9qlp8q0vJ7
— Casey Nolen KSDK (@CaseyNolen) August 17, 2017
The Alt-left Senator then went on to call herself a patriot.
“As a patriot, as someone who has had family members who have been in this military, including my grandfather who served in the Korean War and the Vietnam War, and I’m one of only a few who are not in the military today, I’m looking at this president and what he is saying and his rhetoric and he is causing mass chaos.”
Chappelle-Nadal’s resignation has been called for by several state and Federal congress members, however in a later interview, she doubled down:
“I didn’t mean what I put up. Absolutely not. I was very frustrated. Things have got to change,” Chappelle-Nadal told the Post-Dispatch. “It was in response to the concerns that I am hearing from residents of St. Louis. I have deleted it, and it should have been deleted, but there is something way more important that we should be talking about.”
She added later: “I am not resigning … What I said was wrong, but I am not going to stop talking about what led to that, which is the frustration and anger that many people across America are feeling right now.”
Chappelle-Nadal joins a growing list of Trump assassination porn:
Between Kathy Griffin’s ‘Trump beheading‘ stunt and the NYC Public Theater’s assassination-porn take on Caesar, Chappelle-Nadal is the latest in a series of influential liberals getting off on Trump’s death.
Here’s Rick Ross, whose ankle bracelet went off while hanging out with President Obama at the White House, mouthing “Assassinate Trump like I’m Zimmerman”
Apparently the “Kill Trump” wing of the tolerant left includes Facebook. Here they are (several months ago) letting a user know that an “Assassinate Donald Trump” hate group is A-OK.
Meanwhile
A California conservative was thrown in a halfway house for 60 days right before the 2008 election when he posted (regarding Obama) “he will have a .50 cal in the head soon” on a Yahoo message board.
If you enjoy the content at iBankCoin, please follow us on Twitter
This kinda hate speech is ok … she’s only making sure Soros knows she’s worthy his campaign donations in reelections.
In other news, I just bought 2 pair of eclipse glasses out the trunk of a car. Ironically, not even a shady deal. These dudes put down like $1.5K on glasses in Bend and have around 850 pair they are selling for $10 each. Making a killing but I ain’t gonna miss a once in a lifetime opportunity like this.
Tear it all down man (Michael Savage).
I guess hate speech from the left is OK. I dare any of the liberal jackasses who troll here to defend this hateful bitches rhetoric with something logical and substantative
Never fear. Woman power is here. Does not have to make sense. Just bitch. And bitch. And bitch. The kitchen is calling.
“A California conservative was thrown in a halfway house for 60 days right before the 2008 election when he posted (regarding Obama) “he will have a .50 cal in the head soon” on a Yahoo message board.”
LOL. This is routine practice for all Conservatives in California right before elections.
Scary fact: California is 47th in state IQ rankings at 95.5. Only Louisiana and Mississippi are lower, and not by much.
http://brandongaille.com/list-average-iq-by-country-and-american-states/
Hmmmm seems the “red states” occupy much of the bottom of the list….. not surprisingly
Iron bird with be trifecta, racist, sexist, and dim witted. Congrats!
reersion : Just for fun, I looked into this allegation of of Trump voters being low IQ compared to HRC voters, as the yellow fake press continues to assert. Using the average IQ per state, and assuming that the errors of these averages are Gaussian, there is no difference between the two groups, statistically speaking. Of course this is a very crude analysis but it is a more rigorous basis than that of the press, which is none, as far as I have seen.