The NY Times – owned by a Mexican Billionaire and full of pedo apologists and slanderous cucks, was granted a rare phone interview with top Trump advisor Steve Bannon, who in no uncertain terms made it clear that the MSM is chock full of shills who need to get with the program.
Of course, instead of accurately reporting on what Bannon was trying to convey, doing a bit of self-reflection, and acknowledging the overt collusion between the MSM and the DNC/Clinton campaign during the election, the NY Times once again eschewed journalistic integrity and spun Bannon’s words into a divisive hit piece.
First, let me sum up what Bannon was trying to say:
- Mainstream media is corrupt, deceitful, and “outright activists of the Clinton campaign“
- They got the entire election wrong
- Nobody has been fired or terminated for any of this – (nearly) zero accountability
- They have forever stained their reputation and should perhaps attempt to return to journalistic standards by listening before spouting lies
Suck my nuts
Bannon’s conclusion is summed up in a quote he specifically requested the NY Times run:
Instead of conveying Bannon’s message in context, the NY Times fired up one of their trusty #FakeNews propagandizers and vomited forth a subversive headline, suggesting an attack on freedom of the press:
Here’s what Bannon actually said:
Big difference. The headline implies silencing the free press, when in fact all Bannon was suggesting is the tone-deaf media got it wrong, they have no idea why they got it wrong, they’re still getting it wrong, and they should consider a more balanced approach instead of spewing lies. That is all. Ironically but not surprisingly, after Bannon calls out the media for partisan hackery and subterfuge, the New York Times crafts an Orwellian out of context headline to suggest they are victims of oppression.
Then the NY Times invokes white supremacy:
They wouldn’t happen to be riffing off CNN’s headline from 2 short months ago, would they?
In fact, Google “Bannon Nationalism” and you’ll see all sorts of MSM hit pieces trying to paint the top Trump advisor as some kind of Nazi propagandist (he’s not).
Seeking to malign other members of the conservative press, the NY Times spins Sean Hannity into it’s web of #FakeNews:
If the New York Times, defenders of pedophilia and slanters of truth, refuse to accurately report on something as clear, concise, and honest as what Steve Bannon actually said to them during that phone call, then they are the opposition at a time in which this country so desperately needs to unite and move forward.
If you enjoy the content at iBankCoin, please follow us on Twitter
It’s so weird. Does the media not know that their fear-mongering and propaganda has probably directly lead to a spike in popularity and membership in REAL white nationalist, kkk, & nazi groups?
fuck is wrong with MSM?
probucks. Fuck off with that “probably” horseshit. Closet libtard bigots always see the coming racist dream thru their own mirror. Grow up. MSM is a pussy hat wearing joke. Period.
Four legs good, two legs better bahhhhhhh
Probucks, if you haven’t already you should watch the video of donna brazile bold face lying and denying that she leaked debate questions. Then, another email is leaked proving she leaked more questions. Her reply – “Let me just tell you something. My conscience, as an activist, as a strategist, my conscience is very clear.”
They don’t care that they lie. The have no morals. They don’t care about the consequences. They want to do whatever it takes to further their agenda. Despicable (sic) humans.
KKK used to have 5 million members when FDR was president. Now around the whole world it has like a thousand.
Facts don’t care about your delusions.
Oops I meant Woodrow Wilson
Fox and NY Post are owned by an Australian billionaire, most other large shareholders are Saudi.
Why does any of this matter???
unless of course…
Oh I’m well aware of the fuckery from the DNC and am not surprised in the slightest – thank God for Wikileaks.
I am surprised the liberal sheep are still buying & supporting the sensational b/s. There are consequences to this dumb shit. Didn’t an ambassador get assassinated just a month ago over the sensational Allepo propaganda – misattributing who’s doing what in the region.
Republicans & Democrats at heart really have the same orwellian elite neocon & corporate adjendas. Obama was suppose to change shit but was bankrolled in just a matter of years (or before he even chose his cabinet/had it chosen for him by Citigroup).
Hopefully, Trump can stand strong against the deep state.
I myself haven’t had the opportunity to observed the attendance trends at these gatherings which is why I specified “probably”
you do good work zsropoint, proud to count you among the iBC ranks
peaches is back from Honduras. Yay. Make sure leprosy measles and TB did not follow you back shill. Here in these United Steaks we eat disease and shit it out like men but the children tend to suffer.
Stop whining about the media. Your pseudo analysis is pointless. You´re little angry mind can´t see the forest for the trees.
Delete you’re account.
Thx @Raul
Welcome back @Peaches. It’s important to look at all MSM ownership and their allegiances, including Fox, including Prince Alwaleed’s stake in Twitter, etc. I don’t think Jeff Bezos bought the Washington Post to make money.
“But Mr. Bezos was ultimately convinced that The Post, which he called a national institution, could be brought into the digital age by leveraging the technical expertise and knowledge that he had gained over his decades spent building Amazon into a global technology company.
“I didn’t know anything about the newspaper business, but I did know something about the Internet,” Mr. Bezos said. “That, combined with the financial runway that I can provide, is the reason why I bought The Post.”
He’s done such an amazing job that the Washington Post has exclusive access to the CIA!
I like Bannon’s point that the Democrats are not the opposition. I think most left leaning folks missed that. The Trump/Bannon vision is very different from what the Left is used to seeing from the Republotards. Part of that vision is to give a voice to the blue collar segments of our country, which where traditionally democratic voters outside the South.
Agreed @t.c. – that was a really interesting and diplomatic comment.
Thanks ZPN, you do great work, I enjoy it.
One more thing. I have watched several Vice or other documentaries on illegals who are returned to Mexico. At least two of the people featured mentioned that they voted while they were illegal. I saw that this morning the Washington Times is reporting on a study that estimates that almost 1 million illegals voted.
http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/jan/26/hillary-clinton-received-800000-votes-from-nonciti/
What’s with the attacks on Probuck’s initial comment? He’s absolutely correct that MSM pushing the pendulum way over to one side with their bs causes reactionaries to react. Truthfulness is what draws people toward rationality.
He posed a good question: Are they aware? Do they seek to divide? Or are they just selling papers by stoking fear in, and providing affirmation to, the safe place/shelter-in-place crowd.
The opposition is the party they lost the
popular vote too by a yuuuuge amount.
Bannon whining is just diversion… keep your eyes on this stuff..
https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2017-trump-immigration-ban-conflict-of-interest/
How does that sit with you pay-for-play critics?
t.c … here is the study’s more complete finding…also look at the methodology..
“Based on national polling by a consortium of universities, a report by Mr. Richman said 6.4 percent of the estimated 20 million adult noncitizens in the U.S. voted in November. He extrapolated that that percentage would have added 834,381 net votes for Mrs. Clinton, who received about 2.8 million more votes than Mr. Trump.
Mr. Richman calculated that Mrs. Clinton would have collected 81 percent of noncitizen votes. (so Trump received 19%?)
“Is it plausible that non-citizen votes added to Clinton’s margin? Yes,” Mr. Richman wrote. “Is it plausible that non-citizen votes account for the entire nation-wide popular vote margin held by Clinton? Not at all.”
A study based on polling and extrapolation is underwhelming.
I agree, where did he get that 6.4% number. We know there are illegals voting, the question is whether that many of them are voting. That’s a lot when you have 40 million of them.
Confessions:
The reasons conservatives are winning from Andrew Breitbart:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Amwkc_Aonw&t=2118s
(spoiler: we are 2/3 of the country and progressives are 1/3)
t.c. … think about this.. why would an illegal risk a felony charge which can result in deportation by voting? Just doesn’t make sense. Would you do that? Many of these people spend big bucks to get here. Does illegal voting happen here and there, maybe. But why is it assumed that Dems always benefit when the illegal act is likely greased with cash?
Confessions, That’s an interesting point. I have to admit I was thinking of it more along the lines of: they broke the law to come or stay here, if they are willing to do that, maybe they are more likely to break other laws- maybe that is the wrong way to think about this. Think of it this way though, if they risked so much to get here, why wouldn’t they be willing to take the risk of voting to ensure they stay here, certainly this is all done with false IDs and there is very little risk of getting caught or having it traced to you.
In the end, we all want them to be treated fairly and for the border to be secure. Same, same. Enjoy the weekend, amigo!
You really trust polls taken by universities?
They are part of the problem in case you haven’t noticed.
Veritable hotbeds of chucked thinking. Seriously.
University poll? Lol.